tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-46613375614926930052024-03-05T09:05:23.872-08:00Pierre Ethier- Applied Scientology Processing Auditor Class XIIPierre Ethier spent over 20 years as a staff member of the Church of Scientology studying the religious technology and helping people through religious counseling. Staff members of the Church are volunteer Ministers, who work full time on a charitable volunteer basis without a pay.
Pierre Ethier is now an applied scientology auditor who, among other rundowns, mastered the famous “ Ls “ Rundowns in their powerful original. He speaks fluently English, French, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-5723517252315285412013-04-20T18:50:00.002-07:002013-04-21T10:19:03.453-07:00Skype Call Button<script type="text/javascript" src="//cdn.dev.skype.com/uri/skype-uri.js"></script>
<div id="SkypeButton_Call_commchannel_1">
<script type="text/javascript">
Skype.ui({
"name": "call",
"element": "SkypeButton_Call_commchannel_1",
"participants": ["commchannel"],
"imageSize": 32
});
</script>
</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-1240569179123255052013-03-23T12:23:00.000-07:002013-03-24T08:50:11.766-07:00Go Ethier Go !<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuExneqSfRveQh79c-HiDg4pLss4xrIlMaLqhH3exAFZU1tk4OKiwSTMcvlO8HAMVwW4a1dwcQitXm4aiqk8RuO8Bwy-eZ4ktV9UFEf3qiSSuWxJKodSfCXs3Ujqojslge9KJzZF_yT59_/s1600/andre-ethier-power-play.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuExneqSfRveQh79c-HiDg4pLss4xrIlMaLqhH3exAFZU1tk4OKiwSTMcvlO8HAMVwW4a1dwcQitXm4aiqk8RuO8Bwy-eZ4ktV9UFEf3qiSSuWxJKodSfCXs3Ujqojslge9KJzZF_yT59_/s320/andre-ethier-power-play.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEity4g7OVXban4zRxGA59jbdUDg81fz9xzS03ZAnLX0ud2-Eayb83VQzDZiEGgVRXHX-6mCeLW39468r-hj4NOHZymL2fy-z64M5RhQyCsgJve788HfGnOrwo-QjR7eDGRghM46bGDpIX1u/s1600/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier-.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="228" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEity4g7OVXban4zRxGA59jbdUDg81fz9xzS03ZAnLX0ud2-Eayb83VQzDZiEGgVRXHX-6mCeLW39468r-hj4NOHZymL2fy-z64M5RhQyCsgJve788HfGnOrwo-QjR7eDGRghM46bGDpIX1u/s320/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier-.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXeMQDihbQKQ4P5mN7No3D0htfb7dY4_X3PNsKXdqQ2IRCr4Eb8nlYox-Oe7v7jONTNB1axJn4AM4BLwq6D2Z3voX8N0SUohU3_ATHQN8R-bg6fc0fyHEI3mFXiYAu33bebtnydXdRMgdm/s1600/Ethier-Pierre-A-go.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="239" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXeMQDihbQKQ4P5mN7No3D0htfb7dY4_X3PNsKXdqQ2IRCr4Eb8nlYox-Oe7v7jONTNB1axJn4AM4BLwq6D2Z3voX8N0SUohU3_ATHQN8R-bg6fc0fyHEI3mFXiYAu33bebtnydXdRMgdm/s320/Ethier-Pierre-A-go.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCRcNg3PeKE14OWwPqqLqV-A_mn5a4Bo3HMV31UrzUq_yS5CV7AyadEhC798dIU-I9R66LtoXIu3mopQLdC3NTGtbt2bOg9CA0QZIJhLcDui7Eglx6_H0-CCTgz8QG8ZMhQ3dmy1Dse85M/s1600/Ethier-Pierre-A..jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCRcNg3PeKE14OWwPqqLqV-A_mn5a4Bo3HMV31UrzUq_yS5CV7AyadEhC798dIU-I9R66LtoXIu3mopQLdC3NTGtbt2bOg9CA0QZIJhLcDui7Eglx6_H0-CCTgz8QG8ZMhQ3dmy1Dse85M/s1600/Ethier-Pierre-A..jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBvRLS_VCZGdEWGGgDDGzMJLPG0N2M2Jafn7hVs9Ept1Od5B6egnvyWxcBG9LMwvOZF1-n4GPWB7jSmxeBVkQqhQTkcHYpyMg6FCR61YaMyDO85QCLz8kyaf8_bVoR4H03mM_cvuSM87fk/s1600/Ethier-Pierre.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBvRLS_VCZGdEWGGgDDGzMJLPG0N2M2Jafn7hVs9Ept1Od5B6egnvyWxcBG9LMwvOZF1-n4GPWB7jSmxeBVkQqhQTkcHYpyMg6FCR61YaMyDO85QCLz8kyaf8_bVoR4H03mM_cvuSM87fk/s320/Ethier-Pierre.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhD-0D-pg1awTy7SA0qEFT0usHCIHMMAvdgZbWEVmzNQmjakzoD6kny3Wnoe9bIjL4euuZZDvCge7mdX0ni-8KJor3J9NAgxtc0OsE2yOatsd5UNr2dq0sbOVRMkhHx9ck8w3FFuuWTlhRV/s1600/Ethier-Pierre-A-A.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="216" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhD-0D-pg1awTy7SA0qEFT0usHCIHMMAvdgZbWEVmzNQmjakzoD6kny3Wnoe9bIjL4euuZZDvCge7mdX0ni-8KJor3J9NAgxtc0OsE2yOatsd5UNr2dq0sbOVRMkhHx9ck8w3FFuuWTlhRV/s320/Ethier-Pierre-A-A.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJNNvs-ZTpHuXwL7CQhCkeAltKSo7_4vG3_5D7-v7iq7UfB2eQTCvTUXoTfQ7nYET9IiXB113ZFiisJS-k2HBmVxCMaHRUIhuCOjYW0rIPp39ToBOJPfvhU2qpFBA9f3DsBXxP0a753lkb/s1600/Andre-Ethier-Spring-Training-Homes.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJNNvs-ZTpHuXwL7CQhCkeAltKSo7_4vG3_5D7-v7iq7UfB2eQTCvTUXoTfQ7nYET9IiXB113ZFiisJS-k2HBmVxCMaHRUIhuCOjYW0rIPp39ToBOJPfvhU2qpFBA9f3DsBXxP0a753lkb/s320/Andre-Ethier-Spring-Training-Homes.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-84452036164037915552013-03-21T07:30:00.002-07:002013-03-24T08:50:33.065-07:00Partial list of public audited<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="entry-content" style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
Related links:</div>
<div class="entry-content" style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: #efefef; border: 0px currentColor; color: #666666; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font: 13px/19px "Lucida Grande", Arial, "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; letter-spacing: normal; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;">
<ul style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; list-style: square; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em 3em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/ot-viii-and-beyond-what-lies-ahead-of-us/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">OT VIII & beyond</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Pierre Ethier – Class XII</a><ul style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; list-style: square; margin: 0px 0px 0px 3em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/about-pierre-ethier/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">About Pierre</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/brief-summary-of-my-career-as-a-class-xii/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Brief Summary of my Career as a Class XII</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/a-class-xii-wedding-scientology-marriage-ceremony/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Class XII Wedding</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/class-xiis/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Class XIIs</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/28-2/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Early Involvement in Scientology</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/early-years-this-lifetime/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Early Years This Lifetime</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/ifa/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">IFA Kha Khan Status</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/39-2/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">My Last Days in the Sea Org</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/my-meeting-with-lrh/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">My Meeting with LRH</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/introduction/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Scientology Paradox</a></li>
<li style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-class-xii/success-story-review-counselling/" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">We are against family disconnection</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre-ethier-albert-einstein.jpg" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><img alt="Pierre-Ethier-Albert-Einstein" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2872" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre-ethier-albert-einstein.jpg?w=593" style="-webkit-box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902) 0px 1px 1px; background-color: white; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); box-shadow: 0px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.14902); clear: both; display: block; height: auto; margin: 5px auto 1.5em; max-width: 100%; padding: 4px !important; width: auto;" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
Alberto Abate, Mario Abbiati, Stefania Abbiati, Tom Abrams, Delia Acheson, Doug Acheson, Hans-Ruedi Ackle, Suzette Ackle, Angela Acosta, Mary Acosta, Ramon Acosta, Robin Adair, GianFranco Adami, Bob Adams, Gene Adams, June Adams, Mary Adams, Chris Adler, Fernando Adler, Lloyd Adler, Lottie Adler, David Agami, Elias Agami, Roberto Agami, Theresa Agami, Vicky Agami, Viviane Agami, Frank Aggio, Eliana Aguilar, Patricia Aguilar, Elaine Aguirre, Peter Aguirre, Juan Aguirrebeitia, Robert Ahoua, Margaret Ainsworth, Aldo Airoldi, Debra Aitken, Lena Akesson, Linda Aldrete, Angela Alemania, Alex Alemis, Cathy Alessandrini, Maurizio Alessi, Peter Alevizos, Lee Alexander, Minty Alexander, Peter Alexander, Rick Alexander, Dixon Allen, Gabrielle Allen, Jane Allen, Terry Allen, Lynda Allender, Patricia Almeida, Robert Almqvist, Richard Almstead, Stephen Alpert, Felix Altorfer, Heidi Altorfer, Marianna Altorfer, Diana Alvarado, Enrique Alvarado, Lucio Alverez, Maria-Fernanda Amaya, Konrad Ambach, Amanda Ambrose, Roland Ambuhl, Carol Anahu, Clare Anahu, Bob Anderson, Candy Anderson, Carol Anderson, Cindy Anderson, Doug Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rick Anderson, Sherry Anderson, Roland Andersson, Joe Andruscavage, Greg Angus, Pamela Angus, Dee Ann Rule, Lisa Ann Malmquist, Mary Ann Durham, Jo Anne Beachy, Jo Anne Christensen, Dodley Anson, Elizabeth Anstrin, Peter Anstrin, Luis Antoni Perez, Tiziano Antonini, Peter Antonio, Philip Antonio, Luis Antonios Vasquez, Stefano Antonucci, Luciano Apperti, Mariano Apperti, Mauro Apperti, Juan Arambula, Edurne Aranguren, Michel Archambault, Carlos Arena, Cherie Arend, Tony Arend, Ruth Arguelles, Miguel Arguello, Alejandro Aristi, Michael Armentrout, Janice Armstrong, Raoul Arnal, Gerry Arnett, Ramon Arnold, Vicky Arnold, Rafael Arredo, Philippe Arsac, John Arvanitakis, Tomas Arvidsson, Peter Asberg, Sandro Asnaghi, Harout Assadourian, Bob Asselin, Robert Asselin, Doug Atcheson, Douglas Atcheson, Bruce Atkinson, Peter Atkinson, Bertha Aubert Llorens, Armando Aubert, Bertha Aubert, Helen Audrey Stewart, Pierre Auget, Peter August, Carol Austin, David Austin, Jeff Avrin, Karen Aylor, Rebecca Azares, Inma Azpitarte, Irma Azpitarte, George Baca, Mariella Baccari, Adelio Bacchi, Ornella Bacchi, Frederick Badger, Edwin Baer, Susan Baez, Gianfranco Baggio, Robert Bagnall, Paul Baikie, Roland Baikley, Brigitte Bailke, Wolfgang Baitz, Joanne Baker, John Brownlee, Sally Baker, Yiva Balazs, Mike Ball, Mike Ballard, Otis Ballard, Frederick Balmaele, Fulvio Balmelli, Edgar Bammatter, Fulvio Bandera, Giovanni Bandieri, Giuseppe Bandierini, Henvelle Bandroin, Ken Banfield, Britta Bang, Alison Banks, David Banks, Hanna Baram, Michael Baram, Paul Barbaro, Steve Barbera, Alain Barbier, Jean-Luc Barbier, Antonella Barbieri, Giorgio Barbieri, Sandra Barbieri, carlos Barcena, Vivian Bardavid, Gavin Bargate, Dee Barker, Mary Barne Mann, Debra Barnes, Cathy Barnett, Gabriela Baroni, Michael Barram, Kay Barres, Chuck Barron, Elizabeth Barron, Olivia Barron, Bob Bartell, Donna Barton, Geoffrey Barton, Pamela Barton, Ray Barton, Win Barton, Steve Basin, Chere Bauman, Molly Baxter, Randy Baxter, Liz Bayback, Robin Beaman, Sarah Bean, Joan Beats, Shane Beats, Anne Beatty, Karin Beatty, Richard Beatty, Karen Beaty, Joanne Beaubien, Phil Beaubien, Jocelyne Beauregard Jocelyne Beauregard, Pierre Beauregard, Pierre Beauregards, Donna Beaven, Carlos Becerra, Gabi Beck, Peter Beck, Emily Becker, Stephanie Becquet, Susanne Beeh, Suzanne Beeh, Carol Beeny, carol Beeny, Hannelore Behdig, Ray Behm, Jean Beigantz, Robert Beilhart, Robert Bein, Susana Bejarano, Enzo Beletti, Enzo Belletti, John Bellmaine, Vanessa Bellmaine, Gale Belsel, John Belue, Javier Benet, Martha Benilles, Gracia Bennish, Gisele Benoit, Rolly Berdna, Jacqueline Bergantz, Bobbie Berger, David Berger, Yogi Berger, Linda Bergman, Mitzi Bergman, Albie Berk, Anthony Berka, candy Berman, Ray Bernard, Sergio Bernardini, Roberto Bernazzoli, Eva Berryman, John Berryman, Sylvie Berson, Marino Bertoli, Luigi Bertoni, Sylvie Bertrand, Alain Berube, Franco Beschi, Sharon Besio, Steve Besio, Jean Besre, Richard Best, Leni Betes, Sue Bettinger, Florence Bezazian, Paul Bezazian, Hennie Bezuidenhout, Fabbian Biagio, Loredana Biancolini, Cathy Bible, Monica Biddle, Gaby Bilodeau, Dario Binda, Donato Biondi, Rick Birkenshaw, Donatella Birolo, Laurie Bittner, Karen Black, Michael Black, Stephanie Black, Tina Black, Doris Blair, Eva Blake, Corinne Blanc, Yves Blanc, Sandrine Blanchet, Alain Blanchette, Tony Blanco, Charles Blankenship, Ellie Blankenship, Lise Blankertz, Angelika Blaskovich, Carol Blaut, Jay Blaut, Alexander Blechinger, Dean Blehert, Pamela Blehert, Henry Blumenthal, Frank Blumer, Dieter Blumler, Lorentz Blumler, Paolo Boarato, Dan Boardsen, Silvano Bobadilla, Remo Boden, Arlene Boeger, William Boeger, Serd Boehm, Ginny Boehme, Patrice Boesinger, Donald Bohn, Donna Bohn, Pierre Bolduc, Ellie Bolger, Maureen Bolisczak, Michael Bollen, Michel Bollen, Michael Bolln, Giorgi Bonardi, Giorgio Bonardi, Sonia Bonfiglioli, Simone Bongiovanni, Caroline Bonifas, Rosa Bonisoli, Donald Bonn, Massimo Bonoldi, Paolo Boratao, Christa Bordewieck, Gianluca Bordoni, Jorg Borgmann, Al Born, Kai Bornemann, Susanne Bornemann, Carl Borowski, Carlos Borrero, Giuseppe Borsarini, Jane Bosan, Christian Bosiger, Patrice Bosiger, Patrice Bosinger, Jane Boson, Glen Bostrom, Wendy Bostrom, Nick Bot, Carol Bottle, Claude Boublil, Julian Bouchard, Calisre-Marie Boujon, Francois Boulbil, Francoise Boulbil, Hank Bourland, Denise Boutin, Richard Bovey, Bill Bowen, David Bowers, Janet Bowes, Theo Box, Stephen Boyko, Steven Boyko, Alejandro Bozzone, Bernard Brackenshaw, Ulrich Bracunig, George Bradley, Gregory Bradley, Hugh Bradley, Jeff Bradley, Jeff Bradshaw, Lisa Bragato, Lucia Bragg, Ted Braggin, Antonio Braggion, Antinio Braggione, Antonio Braggione, Brigitte Brandle, Christian Brandle, Karl Braun Steiner, Morgans Bredsdorf, Gabi Brendel, Peter Brendel, Giovanna Brenicci, Pino Brenicci, Annette Brennan, Rob Brennan, Sandra Brennan, Naomi Bresaham, Dee-Dee Bressert, Jim Brewer, Carleen Bridgetown, David Brier, Maureen Brigatti, Rita Bright, Anne Briscoe, Naomi Brisnehan, Bill Broderick, Christa Broderick, Ed Broderick, Cammie Brodie, Patrick Broeker, Louis-Michel Brolles, Madeline Broman, Harry Bronsoiler, Lilis Bronsoiler, Gaetan Brouilette, Christine Brovcenko, Cathy Brown, Charles Brown, Judy Brown, Hans Brugemann, Gro Brugermann, Greg Brumley, Marie-Therese Brunet, Alain Brunette, Larry Bruning, Ruth Brunner, Ed Bryan, Daniel Bryenton, Giacomo Bucchi, Heimo Bucerius, Anna Buch-Hansen, Doris Buchel, Annabel Bueno, Beth Bueno, Sue Bueno, Kathy Bulawa, Hamish Bulger, Lorraine Bulger, Martine Bullot, Claudio Burchi, Irene Burgener, Ray Burgess, Don Burgett, Donald Burgett, Jane Burgett, Arnell Burghorn, Florence Burghorn, Jim Burghorn, Shannon Burke, Lynn Burkhart, Monika Burkli, Roberto Burlone, James Burnham, Jeffrey Burr Johnson, Nancy Burton, Jim Bush, Rex Bush, Ray Butera, Laura Butki, Debbie Butler, William Butler, Tony Butzlaff, Jarrett Buys, Peter Buzzelli, Karen Bydlo, Dan Byl, Peter Byrne, Char Byrnes, Jessica Byrnes, Larry Byrnes, Lawrence Byrnes, Alejandro Cabrera, Elvis Cabrera, Idea Cabrera, Patrizio Cabrini, Elena Cabrino, Lisa Cabrino, Warren Caggiano, Cinzia Cagnoni, Alessia Cairoli, Giorgio Cairoli, Juliette Calame, Sergio Calcinai, Ida Calder, Antionetta Calderon, Guillermo Calderon, Letitia Calderon, Maria-Antonieta Calderon, Sarah Calderon, Barbara Caldwell, Elaine Caldwell, Eric Caldwell, Giovanni Calicchio, Giuseppe Calicchio, Haracio Caligiuri, Fausto Callegarini, Rosette Calliauw, George Calpin, Lisetta Calzolari, Lisette Callarata, Lee Cambigue (Mr), Lee Cambique (Mrs), Nancy Cameron, Antonio Cammarata, Gaetano Cammarata, Salvatore Cammarata, Mark Campbell, Baby Campos, Dolores Campos, Jose-Luis Campos, Susana Campos, Frank Camuso, Gilbert Canali, Paolo Canali, Bruno Cantalupi, Gianni Canuti, Hector Cardenas, Barbara Cardona, Juan Cardona, Maria-Terese Cardona, Chuck Carel, Pat Carel, Pat Carey, Ruth Carey, Jerry Caril, Dixie Carlisle, Hank Carlson, Marti Carlson, Mike Carlson,</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
Scott Carmichael, Ida Carrera, Gina Carrerra, Joanne Carrier, Steve Carrier, Julie Carrol, Gail Carroll, Noel Carroll, Ann Carter, Marylin Carvin, Vickie Case, Doug Casey, Carlos Casillas, Juan Casillas, Claudia Caspary, Raymond Cassano, Sheryle Cassano, Alfonso Castaneira, Jorge Castaneira, Lisa Castellani, Jacinto Castellano, Virgilio Castellano, Carlos Casteneira, Virginia Casteneira, Antonella Castignoli, Carlos Castillo, Lucinda Castillo, Rosana Castillo, Eugenio Castillo,, Betty Castleman, Elizabeth Castleman, Ken Castleman, Rosita Castro, Massimo Cavadenti, Stephanie Cayouette, Nadia Cedro, Julian Cerati, Denise Ceresnak, Berenice Cervantes, Jean Chacon, John Chadder, Mary Chadder, Andrew Chalmers, Alan Chamberlain, Allen Chamberlin, Don Chamberlin, James Chamberlin, John Chambers, Rebecca Chambers, Luis Chamorro, Julie Champness, Mick Champness, Michael, Chandler, Tom Chandler, Karin Chapman, Peter Charbonneau, Jean Charbonnier, Jeanie Charles, John Charlesworth, Louise Charnonneau, Mike Chatelain, Julio Chavez, Martha Chavez, Jeff Chee, Brigitte Chelin, Hellen Chen, Nancy Chepey, Murie Cheshire, Alain Chevrot, Henriette Chevrot, Felipe Child, Filipe Child, Maria-Teresa Child, Roberto Child, Rosario Child, Pam Chipman, Pamela Chipman, Corine Chiquet, Francoise Chiquet, Gerard Chiquet, Josette Chiquet, Luisa Chiricho, Jay Chitteroe, Mireille Chouraki, Lorna Chrichton, Monica Christen, Carl Christensen, James Christensen, Jamie Christensen, Joanne Christensen, Kurt Christensen, Mie Christensen, Malcolm Christiansen, Gillian Christie-Cullen, Gerd Christoffel, Gerry Chromoy, Jeanie Chromoy, Michael Church, Mauro Cinquepalmi, David Cintron, Bruce Cladwell, Bruce Clark, Evelyne Clark, Fran Clark, Jane Clark, Jeanne Clark, Jenny Clark, Michael Clark, Mike Clark, Shirley Clark, Garrison Clarke, Peter Clarke, Jean Claude Smadja, Karl Clausen, Nancy Clay, Peter Clay, Robert Clay, Tom Clay, Emily Clayton, John Clegg, Charles Clements, Dale Clerk, Maria Clovet Bridget Cobb, Maxine Cocain, Giuliano Cocchetti, Guigliana Cocchetti, Jan Cockerill, Judith Code, Keith Code, Joaquim Coelho, Art Colaianni, Lucy Cole, Ross Cole, Allen Collins, Jim Collins, Regina Collins, Sally Colloden, Franco Comi, Carlo Comincini, Maria-Luisa Como, Kathy Conable, kathy Conable, Maria Conceicao, Kathy Condon, Maggie Condon, Margaret Condon, Robert Condon, Ron Condron, Robert Conn, June Connelly, Lynn Connor, Bernd Conradi, Elke Conradi, fabian Conti, Richard Cook, Giancarla Coppi, Ernest Corbett, Gaye Corbett, Arlette Corbi, Paolo Corbi, Jose Cordero, Andre Cordet, Maria Cordova, Shirley Coriveau, Rebecca Cormier, Skip Cormier, Daphne Cornelius, Vernon Cornelius, Ewald Cornelsen, Marc Coromina Hector Cortes, Patty Cortes, Noemi Cortinovis, Luisa Cossini, Giuliano Cossu, Robasto Costanzo, Jennifer Costello, Denis Cote, Ghislan Cote, Paul Cote, Marie-Louise Courvoisier, Marianne Couvoisier, Helen Covary Fritsch, Michael Covin, Maria Covini, John Cowden, Brian Coyle, Bryan Coyle, Ed Cramb, Larry Cramer, Susan Crausaz, Bill Crawford, Ginger Crawler, Michele Crescetino, Bruno Crestino, Adelio Crippa, mario Crippa, Miriam Crippa, Ralph Criscione, Rick Crites, Ron Crites, Gabrielle Crittendon, Barry Critzer, Beppe Crivella, Malcolm Croft, Jim Crosser, Bill Crossley, Roddie Crouch, Emil Crough Allan Crouse, Lisa Crundall, Peter Crundall, Virgilio Cruzado, Gerardo Cucciniello, Mariana Cuenca, Gwen Culbert, Chris Cullen, Sally Culloden, Patrick Cultiera, Peter Cunningham, Elizabeth Currier, Glenn Currier, Jaye Curry, Mike Curry, David Curtis, Patricia Curtis, Yolande Curty, Matteo D’Agnelli, Louis Da Re, Susan Da Re, Alicia Dabbah, Lucy Dabbah, Salomon Dabbah, Bob Dahlquist, Robert Dahlquist, Jacinthe Daigle, Barbara Dakin, Sonja Dal Borgo, Luciano Daldosso, Raoul Dallaire, Antonella Dallari, kathy Dalziel, Karin Damian, Marisa Damiani, Marcos Dana, Cindy Dangberg, Gunther Dangela, Dana Danhoff, Nazmy Daniel, Dick Danilobb, Peter Daniloff, Alycia Danilovich, Harold Danko, Roberto Danne, Francesco DaPasquale, Silvia Dare Susan Daugherty, Jose-Luis Davila, Cathy Davis, Chris Davis, Kennny Davis, Les Davis, Leslie Davis, Lonnie Davis, Nancy Davis, Naomi Davis, Paul Davis, Vicki Davis, Peggy Day Westerman, Brian Day, Doreen Day, Andree De Thiersant, Beatriz De Aguilar, Bernard De La Cour, Celia De Mello, Gisele De Benoit, Hennie De Ridder, Henri De Bruyn, Iria De La Vaccarra, Javier De Aguinaga, Jill De Hochepied, Jim De Grosa, Justa De Villiers, Maria De Landez Ferreira, Marie De Thiersant, Peter De La Cour, Pierre De Thiersant, Tom De Grandpre, Ursula De Leon, Galee Dean, Gaylee Dean, Richard Dean, Alicia Debbah, Henri DeBryun, Thiery DeChaunac, Madeleine DeFreitas, John Dekiewitt, Antonio Del Francia, Bernard Delacour, Jacqueline Delafraye, Odile Delafraye, Patrick Delafraye, Pierre Delance, Jean-Pierre Deleze, Antonio Della Giovanna, Marc Delomez, Odile Delomez, Giovanna Delzanno, Henry DeMarco, Jutta Demeler, Dan Deming, Jane Deming, Thomas Demogines, Paul Denev, Peter Denev, Camille Denholme, Eugenia DeNieto, Francesco DePasquale, Bertrand DePetigny, Marie-Therese DePetigny, Carole DeRoo, Charles Deschambury, Daniel Descombaz, Andree DeThiersant, Andre Dettieri, Justa DeVilliers, Pino Devitini, Candace Devoe, Chuck Devoe, Eloy Dewey, Albert Dewisme, David DeZelle, Anna Di Lorenzo, Anna Di Meo, Antonio Di Gioia Bob Di Diego, Antonio Diaz, Barbara Diaz, Pat Didear, Rosemary Didear, Carlo DiFrancesco, Sergio DiFrancesco, Antonio DiGoia, Tina Dillard, Julia Dimmock, Dana Dineen, Anita Dingler, Raul Dingler, Thomas DiPaola, Loren Dirks, Claes Ditleusen, Else-Marie Ditleusen, Claes Ditlevsen, Bruno Divitini, Dan DiVito, Janet Dixon, Dusan Djukich, Michael Dlack, Bruce Dobin, Forrest Dockery, Eddie Dodd, Linda Doering, Willy Doestschman, Sass Doetschmann, Willy Doetschmann, David Dolan, Mary Dolan, Paul Dolan, Mike Dolbaczuk, Karin Don Braber, Graham Donavan, Angelo Donghia, Christa Donker, Graham Donovan, Cecile Donze, Therese Donze, Karen Doobi, Mercedes Dorelia, Anna Dorigo, Elen Dorset, Ellen Dorsett, Eugenio Dos-Santos, Denyse Doudan, Alan Douglas, Jim Douglas, Joan Douglas, Richard Douglas, Robert Drake, Chris Dresser, Robin Drimmer, Ronnie Drimmer, Mitchell Drobbin, Jeff Drumm, Veronique DuBellay, Horst Dubiel, Dennis Dubin, Stan Dubin, Martin Dubow, Bob Duggan, Tom Duggan, Bob Duggin, Helene Dugmore, Georgette Dumas, Scott Duncan, Joe Duncanson, Joseph Duncanson, Lindy Duncanson, Ann Dunev, Camille Dunholme, Jean-Jacques Dunki, James Dunn, Brigitte Duquesne, Francoise Durand, Dave Durnan, Jurgen Durnberger, Peter Durnil, Corrie Dutko, Brenda Dyer, Trevor Eade, Dick Eastin, John Eastment, Edna Eaton, Lolita Echavarria, Fred Eckfeld, Lilliane Eckharter, Margaret Eckold, Tina Eckstein, Anders Eckwell, Eve Eden, Donna Edison, Steve Edison, Ellen Edmondson, Eloise Edmonson, Louise Edmunson, Luis Eduardo Cuello, Carlton Edwards, Deborah Edwards, Harold Edwards, Darlene Eggen, Dean Eggen, Jerry Ehrlich, Debbie Ehst, Ilse Eich, Alexander Einkhour, Jay Eisenbach, Else-Brith Ekstrom, Roland Ekstrom, Maria Elana Nunez, Maria Elena Martini, Amy Elliot, Hugh Elliot, Kay Elsner, Catherine Emard, Philip Embick, Susan Embick, Pat Emery, Tucker Emmett, Susan Emory, Shahab Emran, Shahab Emrani, David Ender, Edi Ender, Sabine Ender, Christine Engler, Thomas Engler, Walter Erb, Lothar Erdtmann, Nena Erdtmann, Ramses Erdtmann, Gert Eriksson, Gunilla Eriksson, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Espinoza, Christopher Estey, Tina Estey, Carol Estrada, Julio Estrada, Beverley Ettinger, Wendy Ettricks, Gus Evans, Noel Evans, Suzanne Evans, Virginia Fair, Andre Fakir, Tony Falcaro, Steve Falcy, Caroline Falone, David Farca Lorna Farca, Raquel Farca, Franco Farina, Jana Farr, Valerie Fasnakis, Floriana Fassi, Gianfranco Fassi, Marina Favilla, Marino Fazi, Marisa Fazi, Stephen Fedele, Dennis Feeney, Eloisa Feeney, Axel Fehling, Liv Fehn, Maria-Luisa Feirrara, Leon Feldbrill, Maria Feldman, Sikica Feldman, Caroline Felons, John Fenton, Enrico Fermi, Slvador Fernanderz, Salvador Fernandez Herrero, Juan Fernandez, Salvator Fernandez, Jose Ferrano, Juan Ferrara, Vivian Ferrara, Bruno Ferrari, Mario Ferrari, Rosar</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
ia Ferrario, Robert Ferrarro, Lourdes Ferreira, Maria Ferreira, Alberto Ferrerro, Linda Ferry, Lynn Ferry, Richard Ferry, Steven Ferry, Cindy Feshbach, Kathy Feshbach, Lynn Feshbach, Matthew Feshbach, Sheryle Festa, Ron Fiandaca, James Fiducia, Margrit Fierz, Angel Figueroa, Fred Filios, Robin Filios, Giusy Filippini, Renata Filippini, Betty Filisky, robert Filisky, Beatrice Findlay, David Findlay, Lena Findlay, Bill Findley, Bob Fine, Elena Fine, Mike Fine, Robert Fine, Mary Finley, Hans-Peter Fischer, Dianne Fisher, Joan Fisher, Leslie Fisher, Gary Fishman, Patrice Fishman, Jonny Fjall, Jim Flahive, Bob Flanagan, Dave Fleershoff, Debby Flemming, John Flemming, Mary Float, Irma Flores, Walter Flosser, Willi Flosser, Luigi Fogazzi, Leslie Foglesong, John Foglio, Ed Fomby, Astrid Fontana, Gerald Foos, Bob Forrest, Nancy Forrest, David Forsman, Suzanne Fortin, Fabio Fortunat, Sarina Foster, Christian Fouche, Rex Fowler, Jonathan Fox, Marsha Fox, Russell Fox, Marie France Carpentier, Albert Franceschetti, Clara Franceschetti, Maria Franceschinelli, Alessandra Franchi, Maria Franchini, Carlo Francisco, Fabrizio Francomano, Veronica Francomano, vincente Francomano, Jim Frankel, Massimo Franzoni, Neil Fraser, Susana Frederick, Judy Freedman, Rosy Freihoff, Bertha Frias, Roxanne Friend, Hanne Fries, Fabio Frigerio, Thomas Frigge, Harry Frisch, Nancy Frisch, Helen Fritsch, Arda Froese, Diane Froese, Linda Frommer, Greg Frost, Claude Froute, Mary Fry, Rafael Fuentes, Valerie Fuetris, Hamida Fuiatti, Debra Fuller, Terry Fuller, Wayne Fuller, Graziano Fumari, Dudo Func, Richard Furbish, Geoff Fushi, Geoffrey Fushi, Jim Futris, John Futris, Gunther Gafton, Phillipe Gaille, Sheila Gaiman, Linda Galardo, Bianca Galbiati, Giancarlo Galbiati, David Gale, Marie Gale, Jose-Luis Galicia Jr, Gisela Galicia, Guillermo Galicia, Jose Galicia, Jose-Luis Galicia, Ernesto Galli, Eugenio Galli, Marilena Galli, Mauricio Galli, Margaret Gallivan, Ursula Gambert, Carmen Gamboa, Alessandro Gangidino, Pino Gangidino, Pino Gangislino, Steve Ganns, Marianne Garatti, Alfred Garbutt, Manuel Garces, Maria Garces, Cecilia Garcia, Ernesto Garcia, Evangelina Garcia, Gisela Garcia, Gladis Garcia, Ignacio Garcia, Jesus Garcia, Martha Garcia, Maria-Pia Gardini, Claire Gardner, Eva Gardner, Lilia Garduno, Benjamin Garner, Trisa Garner, Marc Garnier, Alicia Garrido, Gloria Garrido, Dolores Garriga, Manuel Gartces Linda Garver, Celia Garza, Laura Garza, Nadina Garza, Nadine Garza, Jane Gatliff, Gary Gatliffe, Eduardo Gatti, Fabrizio Gatti, Luciana Gatti, Chantal Gauthier, Harvey Gauthier, Luisa Gavazzi, Adelio Gaviraghi, Elena Gaviraghi, Fabrizio Gaviraghi, Paul Gawrello, Larry Geis, Malcom Gellatly, Barb Gendusa, Barbara Gendusa, Angelo Gentile, Martino Gentile, Marianne Genton, Antoine Geoffre, Kitty Georgius, Ken Gerbino, Victoria Gerbino, Peter Gerhards, Chris Gerson, Jan Gerson, Stan Gerson, Theresa Gerson, Reto Gfeller, Benjamin Ghiora, Benny Ghiora, Wendy Ghiora, Giovanni Giambarini, Mauro Gianfranco, Sergio Giannini, Dave Gibbons, Anne Giblin, Ingrid Gibson, Cathy Giesecke, Ellen Giffin, Irma Giger, Felipe Gil, Sandra Gil, Linda Gilbert, Louise Gilbert, Richard Gilbert, Steve Gilbert, William Gillette, Per Ginge-Nielsen, Giovanni Giocamezzi, Angelia Gioffre Angela Gioffre, Massimo Giordanengo, Luisa Giovanna Bellagamba, Fabio Giovannelli, Linda Giovanni, Phil Giovinco, Giorgio Girardi, Ernst Girnus, Allan Giroler, Alfredo Gironella, Antonio Gironella, Luisa Gissi, Luisa Gissy, Lorenzo Gizzarelli, Michelle Gizzi, Kurt Glassel, Anne Glenski, Bernadette Glenski, Alba Gloor, Greg Gloor, Lois Gloor, Albert Glow, Franziska Glur, Giorgio Gobbi, Sandra Godding, Tom Godfrey, Vivian Godfrey, Peter Godwin, Georgio Goffe, Alberto Goffy, Giorgio Goffy, Gerri Golashesky, Calla Gold, Marshall Goldblatt, Eden Golden, Emily Goldfield, Steve Goldfield, Lynne Goldstein, Allan Gomery, Mercedes Gomez, Roberto Goncalves, Kay Gonsolin, Ed Gonsoulin, Leona Gonsoulin, Carlos Gonzales, Leon Gonzales, Lillian Gonzales, Lou Gonzales, Maria Gonzales, Monica Gonzales, Penny Gonzales, Pilar Gonzales, Raoul Gonzales, Rom Gonzales, Silvana Gonzales, Susana Gonzales, Alvaro Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Oscar Gonzalez, Pilar Gonzalez, John Good, Kevin Good, Marianne Good, Sherry Good, Randy Goode, Ann Gordin, Anne Gordin, Dawn Gordon, Gerald Gordon, Jerry Gordon, Gabriele Gordt, Emilia Gorini, Edward Goss, Rose Goss, Liane Gottwald, Hank Gould, Mark Gould, Sylvain Goulet, Christian Gounord, Daniele Gounord, Ignacio Gracia, Robert Graf, Jill Graham, Eva Gramm, Alba Grande, Alfonso Grande, Maurizio Grande, Carlo Granito, Theo Grant, Thoe Grant, Alicia Gray, Bob Gray, Maria Grazia Rocco, Linda Graziano, Anita Grechi, Betty Green, Jane Greenberg, Martin Greenberg, Marty Greenberg, John Greene, Maurice Greene, Peter Greene, Jayne Greenwalt, Anita Gregory, Kathy Gregory, Scott Gregory, Anne Greig, Mark Greisen, Simon Grenier, Anne Grieg, Nancy Griffith, Cristina Groenewold, Ricardo Groenewold, Cristina Groenwold, Jaime Groesbeck Michael Grope, Dominique Gropper, Carla Grossbohlin, Harry Grossbohlin, Larry Grout, Cathy Grown, Wilmie Gruber, Bertha Guadalajara, Mariani Gualtiero, Marianne Gubeli, Pierre Guenette, Lauri Guerin, Antonieta Guerrero, Francisca Guerrero, Irma Guerrero, Maria Guerrero, Virginia Guerrero, Anne-Marie Guertin, Duncan Guertin, Diana Guillen, Javier Guillen, jaime Guillertin, Brigitta Gustafsson, Brigitte Gutermann, Rolf Gutermann, Giuliana Gutierrez, Javier Gutierrez, Veronica Gutierrez, Peter Guy, Victor Guzman, Steve Guzzetta, Enza Guzzo, Helga Habiger, Gisela Hackenjos, Holger Hackenjos, Marie Hadjian, Jill Hagen, Diane Hahn, Helgard Hahn, Ernst Haible, Gali Halamish, Dave Haldy, Bob Hall, Cindy Hall, Betty Halliday, Lisa Halverson, Susan Hamady, Bob Hamilton, Edward Hamlyn, Ted Hamlyn, Michael Hancock, Lynne Haney, Michael Haney, Wally Hanks, Bill Hanley, Stina Hans, Henning Hansen, Wiebke Hansen, Eve Hanson, Janet Hanson, Larry Hanson, Lawrence Hanson, Randy Hanson, Margaret Hardy, Charlotte Harness, Connie Harris, Oliver Harris, Roger Harrison, Sioux Hart, Gunter Hass, Wenche Haugen, Lynn Hauptman, Bob Hay, Steven Hayes, Steve Head, Tom Head, Gary Hedge, Janet Hedge, Elisabeth Hedinger, Robert Hedinger, Peter Heer, Betsy Heess, Barbara Hegetschweiler, Helmut Heinzel, Mary Heldt, Katie Heller, Nina Helms, Jean Helpert, Monika Helpert, Berenice Hemsani, Moises Hemsani, Bev Henderson, Diane Henderson, Michael Henderson, Craig Hendrick, Jack Henessey, Bill Henley, Tim Henley, Robin Hennessy, Hans Henriksen, Cyril Henry Holman, Keren Hepner, Randy Hepner, Enrique Hernandez, Isabel Hernandez, Madalena Hernandez, Maria Hernandez, Martha Hernandez, Robert Hernandez, Mario Herold, Janet Herring, Norman Herring, Nan Herst, Pam Hertz, Axel Hesse, Anette Hevillon, Martha Higareda, Jim Highsmith, Saul Hildebrand, Jonathan Hill, Patricia Hillard, Sonia Hines, Robert Hinson, Peggy Hitchman, Tony Hitchman, Eva Hitz, Andy Hoare, Joe Hochman, Edith Hodgskinson, Edith Hodgson, Margaret Hodkin, Terry Hodosi, Hans Hodosy, Terry Hodosy, Otmar Hofer, Lucie Hoffmann, Rose Hogg, Doug Hoisington, Paula Hoisington, Debby Holder, Alan Hollander, Janet Hollander, Karen Hollander, Mimi Holm, Steven Holmes, Fred Holtby, Frederick Holtby, Ursula Holub, Gilles Homier, Francoise Hooks, Vera Hopkins, Joel Hord, Cynthia Horton, Dale Horton, Bill Horwich, Fred Houck, Guy Houston, Karen Howard, Bill Howey, David Howson, Faith Hudon, Faith Hudson, Ana Huelva, Debbie Hughes, Greg Hughes, Harriette Hughes, Peter Hughes, Rick Hull, Sherene Hull, Paul Hulme, Debbie Hulthen, Deborah Hulthen, Leena Hungerbuhler, Fred Hunt, Midge Hunt, Peter Hunt, Beatrice Hunziger, Peter Hunziker, Elena Hurtado, Nicolas Hurtado, Jane Hutchins, June Hutchins, Fawn Hutton, Marilyn Hydie, Jeff Hyland, Ellen Hyrne, Seija Hytonen, Sharon Imburgia, Mavis Imra, Barbara Inbody, Bob Inbody, Werner Indermuhle Deborah Indursky, Michael Ingbar, Renato Ingenito, Judith Irons, Judy Irons, Lynn Irons, Anne Isabelle, Anna Iverson, Jim Jackson, Brigitte Jacobi, Michael Jacobi, Dan Jacobs, Myrna Jacobs, Paul Jaconello, Albert Jacquier, Ariane Jacquier, Hamida Jafferji</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
, Elias Jafif, Sandra Jager, Henry Jaggers, Mary Jane Luniewski, Bernt Janssen, Carmen Jaramillo, Keith Jarrett, Luisa Javier, Sally Jeans, Georg Jecel, David Jelley, Molly Jelley, Dane Jenkins, John Jennings, Barbara Jensen, Britta Jensen, Craig Jensen, Mary Jensen, Sally Jensen, Karen Jepson, Alexandra Jimenez, Claudia Jimenez, Javier Jimenez, Manuel Jimenez, Ramon Jimenez, Raoul Jimenez, Gust Johanesson, Wendel Johanesson, Hakan Johansson, Peter John, Berenice Johnson, Brent Johnson, Bruce Johnson, Jay Johnson, Jervis Johnson, Judy Johnson, Larry Johnson, Mark Johnson, Richard Johnson, Stacia Johnson, steve Johnson, Tyrone Johnson, Andrew Johnston, DeDe Johnston, Drew Johnston, Terry Johnston, Evelyn Johnstone, Lisa Johonnsesson, Lisa Johonnsson, Mark Jonathan Kloss, Debbie Jones, Iain Jones, Mark Jones, Robin Jones, Henning Jorck, Peter Jorck, Andrea Jordan, Paul Joseph, Claudia Joss, Danielle Jossi, Carol Joyal, Carolyn Judd, Karen Judkin, Hans Juel, Claudia Jugo, Diane Jullian, Abby Juneau, Michael Juneau, Mike Juneau, Unice Juneau, Andre Jurt, James Justice, Suzanne Justus, Alan Juvonen, Allan Juvonen, Susan Juvonen, Magda Kahanu, David Kahn, Mary Kahn, Barbara Kalergis, Bob Kalergis, James Kalergis, Carla Kammer, Gloria Kamph, Magda Kanahu, Rory Kaplan, Cheryl Kapuler, Mauri Karger, Michael Karger, Susan Karnovsky, Lamia Kashoghi, Carlo Katchi, Eurlich Katschzmann, Ulrich Katzschmann, Emil Kauer, Emile Kauer, Hugo Kaufmann, Mary Kaufmann, David Kaup, Bob Kaye, Robert Kaye, David Keat, Jamie Keavic, Dietmar Kecht, Goerge Keck, Gary Keenan, Guy Keenan, Jeanne Keenan, Richard Keeney, Grace Kefover, Patrick Kegel, John Keldami, Ingrid Keller, Alan Kellman, Kathy Kemmerer, Steve Kemp, Klaus Kempe, Marieta Kempe, Bonnie Kempner, Rudi Kempner, Robert Kenny, Carla Kent Grossbohlin, James Keppler, Kifumi Keppler, Stefan Kerber, John Kerr, Kitty Kerr, Naomi Kerr, Vivien Kerslake, Marianne Kessler, Denis Keyes, Ike Kezsbom, Peter Khaled, Christopher Kight, Bruno Kihm, Bill Kilpatrick, Kyung Kim, Scott Kimball, Sharon Kimball, Ivy Kimmich, Michael King Hancock, Eddie King, Fred King, Frederick King, Isabel King, Liz King, Susi Kinglefuss, Carol Kingsley, Siegfried Kiontke, Carmine Kischke, Christine Kischke, helen Kitchen, Helen Kitchin, Andrew Kitt, Andy Kitt, Any Kitt, Tara Kitt, John Kitzinger, Jens Kjeldsen, Niels Kjeldsen, Ken Klaebe, Monroe Kleiderman, Andreas Klein, Barry Klein, Jan Klein, Janet Klein, Naomo Klein, Martha Kleinbaum Lolita Kleinbaum, Ricardo Kleinbaum, Rosita Kleinbaum, Ruben Kleinbaum, Salvador Kleinbaum, Richard Kleinberg, Naomi Kleyn, Sandra Kleyn, Heidi Klinger, Michael Klinger, Gad Klopstock, Yaffa Klopstock, yaffa Klopstock, Sharon Kloss, Andrea Kluge, Dave Kluge, Housi Knecht, Nancy Kneighten, Angie Knewitz, Elsa Knewitz, Elvira Knewitz, Nancy Knighten, Ruth Knudsen, Emilio Kobeh, Andi Koch, Andres Koch, Christa Koch, Elizabeth Kochsiek, Walter Koenig, Walter Kolabruski, Felix Kolla, Klaus Koller, Emilie Kong, Martha Korringa, Wouter Korringa, Juliane Kostinger, Hans-Peter Kotzli, Dick Kraman, Jayne Kraman, Roswitha Kratz, Rolf Krause, Susan Krause, James Krebsbach, Nancy Kredel, Pam Kresse, Randy Kretchmar, Rene Kristal, Karl Kroeger, Sandy Kroeger, Elizabeth Kroll, Herwig Kroll, Greg Krueger, Daniel Kuhn, Maina Kuhn, Roland Kuhn, Ron Kule, Josef Kunz, Steve Kurth, Tuula Kuusisto, Sandy Kuypers, Iria La Vaccara, Phil La Claire, Michele Labarile, Elena Labarrure, Andre Laberge, Johnny Laboriel, Bob Labre, Nick Labuschagne, Rocky Lackey, Steven Lackey, Richard Lacy, Andy Ladd, Nicole Lafreniere, Connie Lahmann, Simone Laine, Bert Laing, Joachim Laiss, Stevie Lake, Josette Lambert, Giovanni Lamberti Frederica Lambertini, Enzo Lamorgese, Federica Lampronti, Bernardo Lan, Carlos Lan, Jeannie Lan, Miguel Lan, Morris Lan, Sarah Lan, Victorina Landra, Janet Langdon, Gennaro Langella, Andree Langevin, Michael Lanza, Serge Lapointe, Thierry Laprevote, Angela Laramea, Charla Larch, Donna LaRock, Elena Larrabure, Miguel Larrabure, Allen Larsen, Alan Larson, Arwen Larson, Janet Larson, Sherry Larson, Christina Larsson, Urban Larsson, Albert Lasala, Finn Lassen, Connie Latch, Lloyd Latch, Brenda Latchman, Pat Lathrom, Marjorie Laughlin, Tom Laughran, Joe Lauricella, Marie-Margrethe Lauritzen, John Laursen, Iria Lavacarra, Angelo Lavazza, Peggy Laverdiere, Andre Lavergnat, Charles Lavin, Joseph Lavin, Janet Lawrence, Greg Layton, Philippe Le Bourveau, Marc leach, Bruce Leavitt, Luis Leceta, Didier LeClercq, Steve Lederman, Carol Lee Womble, James Lee Antoinette Lee, Barbara Lee, Michael Lee, Mike Lee, Sydney Lee, Alain Lefebre, Eva Lefevre, Sam Lefkowitz, Pierre LeFrancois, Alain Lefrancois, Monique Lefrancois, Giuliana Legnani, Merriad Lehman, Monica Lehman, Yves Lehman, Hannes Lehmann, Klaus Lehmann, Meinrad Lehmann, Vivian Leifield, Al Leighton, Carol Leipsic, Ruth Lennie, Bente Lenz, Maurizio Lenzi, Ingrid Lenzke, Luis Leon, Ricardo Leon, Marsha Leone, Fabrizio Leonelli, Ben Leong, Gunter Leonhardt, Sergio Leoni, Gary Lerner, Diane Leroux, Vanella Lesevre, Andrea Lettieri, Tobias Leutenegger, Joe Levin, Johnny Levin, Alvah Levine, Barbara Levine, Daniel Levine, Doris Levine, Caspar Levman, Jan Levy, Sam Levy, Stew Levy, Barbara Lewis, Carita Lewis, Donna Lewis, James Lewis, Laura Lewis, Michael Lewis, Myron Lewis, Norman Lewis, Ronald Lewis, Victor Lidchi, Maria Lienert, Janet Light, Mari-Ann Lind, Per Lindberg, Ole Lindell, Christina Lindroth, Artur Lindskog, Virginia Lindskog, Michael Lindström, Lenny Lindstrom, Michael Lindstrom, Lil Linson, David Lipchitz, Elizabeth Lippert, Lee Lippert, Heidi Lipscher, Juraj Lipscher, Albert Lipschutz, Mireille Lipschutz, Ken Lipton, Francesco Locilento, Frnaco Locilento, Jurg Locker, Rachel Lockwood, Maria Lodovici, Mario Lodovici, Leona Logan, Beatrix Lohman, Claus Lohmann, Leonardo Loi, Robert Lolln, Salvatore Lombardo, Desiree Long, Steve Longbotham, Joan Lonstein, Joan Loosli, Angel Lopez, Juan-Baptista Lopez, Leticia Lopez, Charla Lorch, Pier-Angelo Loreggia, Bill Lorentzen, Vikki Lorentzen, Carlos Lores, Michel Loron, Christi Losh, Mary Losty, Albert Lotz, Bjorn Lotz, Trey Lotz, Marlys Lotzer, Jan Loup Gilliot, Krystyna Louw, Anita Lowe, Jill Lowe, Madeline Lowe, Susan Lowe, Bernie Lowenstein, Grace Lowrance, Maria Lozano, Borghild Lozio, Nicola Lozio, Henry Lubbe, Harry Lucas, Nick Lucchesi, Hannelore Luck, Beth Ludwig Beth Ludwig, Patrick Lue Fan, Carlo Lugli, Claudio Lugli, Maria Lugli, Renata Lugli, Jerry Lull, Steve Lund, Conny Lundberg, Betty Lunde, Borje Lundgren, Anita Lundstedt, Mary-Jane Luniewski, Ron Luniewski, Ronald Luniewski, Paolo Luoni, Tarcisio Luoni, David Luscombe, Christian Lussi, Ernie Lutz, Hania Lux, Sally Lyn Zwan, June Lynch, Mary Lynne Wolfe, Bobby Lyons, Bruno Maca, Lenny Macaluso, Deanne Macdonald, Debbi Mace, Debbie Mace, Rick MacFarlane Sylvia Machado, Marco Macias, Phyllis Mack, Daniel MacKenzie, Bernadette Macullo, James Madia, Jim Madia, Stephen Mage, Maurizio Maggione, Janine Magnan, Janine Magnan, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Mario Majorski, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Lina Majorsky Marc Majorsky, Mario Majorsky, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, M</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
arco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, Dan Marino, Daniel Marino, Gennaro Marino, Christie Marion, Jessica Marks, Susan Marple, Ray Marquardt, Pura Marquez, carlo Martelli, Carlos Martelli, Diana Martelli, Michele Martelli, Pedro Martin-Moreno, Christina Martinez, Francisco Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lucinda Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Pilar Martinez, Sergio Martinez, Veronica Martinez, Luisella Martini, Marc Marty, Robert Marx, Laura Mason, Mary Mason, Mary-Clare Mason, Dedo Maspero, Giusy Maspero, Patrizio Maspero, Valerio Maspero, Denise Masse, Alessandro Massolo, Donato Masucci, Antonelo Matar, Angela Matarazzo, Antonello Matarazzo, Luis Mateos, Dwight Matheny, Konrad Matt, Leon Matthews, Sue Mattinson, Giorgio Mattioli, Maria Mattioli, Maria-Teresa Mattioli, Pietro Mauro, GianFranco Mauro, Mary Mauser, Thomas Maxwell, Jeanette May, Elena Maya, James Mayer, Jim Mayer, Ulrich Mayer, Ursi Mayer, Regula Mayor, Kate Mays, Todd Mays, Christine Mazarand, Riccardo Mazza, Tito Mazza, Scott Mazzanarella, Elisabetta Mazzorato, Evangelina Mazzorato, Loris Mazzorato, Vincenzo Mazzoratto, Rose McAffee, Pam McCall, Mary McCarran, Mike McCaudles, Peter McCord, Carlynn McCormick, John McCormick, Margee McCormick, Rod McCormick, Gwen McCoy, Michael McCoy, Mick McCoy, Joseph McCusker, Janice McDaniels, Janice McDannel, Carolann McDonald, Michael McDonald, Shannon McDougall, Gill McEnery, Robert McFarlane, Jeff McGee, Lee McGee, Tom McIntyre, David McKee, Thomas McKee, Dennis McKenna, Mark McKenna, Breck McKinley, Jean McKinnon, Terry McKnee, Beth McLeod, Kenny McLeod, Debbie McNeely, Gerald McNeely, Jerry McNeely, Mario McQuade, Simon Meadmore, Gisela Medina, Lee Meekcoms, Karen Megan, Giovanna Megna, Jeannette Meier, Ursi Meier, Paolo Meini, Bob Meinsma, Betsy Melchior, Tim Melchior, Claire Melgren, david Melis, Alexia Melocchi, Al Melone, Penny Melrose Fernando Mena, Brigitte Meneau, Raquel Menoa, Guy Mercier, May Meriwether, Stefania Merlino, Clarisse Meschoulam, Tom Messick, Helen Meuley Ract, Alex Meyer, Christine Meyer, Otto Meyer, Ursi Meyer, jackie Meyers, Jacquellyn Meyers, Francoise Michaillet, Ron Michalski, Louis Michel Brolles, Lana Micheletti, Lina Micheletti, Tony Milan, Renato Milani, Uwe Millan, Gil Miller, Tina Miller, Karen Milligan, Rick Milner, Terry Milner, Gisella Minacci, Tudy Ming, Jacqueline Mingard, Peter Miranda, Loretta Miscavige, Ron Miscavige, Joe Miskowiecz, Paul Missonis, Tess Mobilia, Lucio Modegna, Joe Modica, Gunter Mohl, Rudi Mohl, Antonello Moi, Vera Moklowya, Paolo Molini, Don Moll, Fritz Mollman, Brigitta Mollmann, Kurt Molman, Jacky Molnar, Theo Molten, Charles Momsen, Greg Montangero, Susanne Montangero, Luisa Montero, Vicky Montesinos, Vito Montini, Vittorio Montini, Ed Mooney, Pat Mooney, Art Moore, Brigid Moore, Bruce Moore, David Moore, Peter Moore, Wendy Moose, Jose-Luis Morales, Paul Morel, Pablo Moreno, Tas Morfopoulos, Jeaninne Morissette, Angela Moro, Livia Morone, Loreno Moroni, Magda Morra, Brian Morrell, Silvana Morri, Kathy Morrill, Patricia Morrill, Terry Morrill, Bob Morris, Deborah Morris, Faye Morris, Gloria Morris, Mavis Morrison, Karen Morrissett, Carol Morse, David Morse, Joan Mort, Cecilia Mortano, Mina Moschini, Mildred Moscona, Lauren Moseley, Cathy Moss, Kathy Moss, Ron Moss, Lena Moufarej, Linan Moufarres, Art Mould, Richard Moulton, David Mowbray, david Mowbray, Roger Mueller, Walter Mueller, Elly Muller, fred Muller, Josef Muller, Peter Muller, Robert Muller, Roger Muller, Walter Muller, Jean-Christophe Mulliez, Javier Munoz Carmen Munoz, Hector Munoz, Javier Munoz, Alejandra Munro, Klaus Munz, Evelyn Murdock, Dan Murillo, Peter Murphy, Jerry Murray, Marvin Murray, Pat Murray, Barbara Musach, Bob Musack, Janice Myerberg, Paul Myerberg, Beth Nabors, Betyh Nabors, Lorena Nacif, Linda Nadir, Bill Nagengast, Judy Nagengast, Douglas Nagy, Mike Napier, Ed Naranjo, Antonio Narcisco, Cecilia Nascimento, Silvia Nascimento, Anne Nash, Bob Nastas, Claudio Natale, Marco Natale, Silvia Natale, Silvio Natale, Orlando Navarro, Patricia Navarro, Ann Naylor, Darrel Naylor, Astrid Neal, James Neal, Ron Nedd, Dennis Negley, Wendy Negley, Linda Neilson, Robert Neilson, Pamela Nelson, Donna Nemier, Art Nermiah, John Ness, Douglas Neuman, Rebecca Neuman, Gloria Neumeyer, Walter Neuschitzer, Herman Newkirk, Josh Newkirk, Alex Newman, Anita Newman, Arnold Newman, Becky Newman, Buzz Newman, John Newman, Mark Newman, Mary Newman, Phil Newman, Steve Newman, Willie Newman, Edith Nichols, Carol Nickols, John Nickols, Anne Nielsen, Bob Nielson, Celia Niemerow, Guillermo Nietes, Norma Nieto, Oscar Nieves, Ruth Nighswonger, Franco Nigro, Meryl Nilsson, Betty Nimger, Christian Nissen, Christian Nitart, Claude Nitart, Brodie Noeske, Rodie Noeske, Robert Nordlund, Thomas Nordlund, Robert Nordstrom, nadine Normal, Michael Norris, Mike Norris, Nadia North, Derrick Northcross, Gianfranco Notari , John Novello, Norm Novitsky, Mark Noyes, Bruna Nucci, Richard Nuccio, Jeff Nuckols, John Nuckols, Steve Nuckols, Judy Nugent, Antonio Nunes, Ann Nunez, Carlos Nunez, Jose Nunez, Maria-Elena Nunez, Mario Nunez, Jose-Luis Nuno, Manfred Nussle, Maria Nutgeren, David Nutter, Sally Nutter, Tom Nyerges, Elaine O’Connell, Kevin O’Donnell, Maryann O’Donnell, Melissa O’Hara, Steve O’Hara, Maureen O’Keefe, Kieran O’Leary, Peter Obolensky, Hugo Ocalo, Steven Ogmon, Therese Oliva, Barbara Oliver, Joy Ollemans, Dolores Olmos, Geri Olson, Giuseppe Onesti, Michel Oneyron, Churlya Ong Wurfel, Enrico Opipari, Luisa Opipari, Giuseppe Oresti, Luisa Orlandini, Umberto Orlandini, Pilar Orozco, Dolores Ortiz, Jesus Ortiz, Veronica Orvananos, Hazel Osborne, Mario Osborne, Mike Osborne, Rick Osborne, Carol Osinaga, Inger Ostlund, Vega Ostlund, Peter Otanjac, Patrick Ouellette, Bill Owen, Brooke Owen, Dan Owen, James Owen, Jim Owen, Michael Owen, Nancy Owen, Robert Pace, Adrian Padilla, Ariel Padva, Robert Page, Mary-Jo Pagel, Per Pagh, Rebecca Pagovich, Paula Paiewonsky, Mauricio Palacios, Chris Palmer, Garnet Palmer, Margie Palmer, Dario Pandolfi, Alessandra Panigalli, Roberto Panigalli, Jennifer Pantermuehl, Daniela Paolini, Paolo Paolini, Pietro Paolini, Daniele Paoloni, George Papaheraklis, Juan Paredes, Louise Parent, Serge Parent, Floriana Paris, Anna Parise, Beverly Park, Margaret Parke, Phillip Parke, Debbie Parker, James Parker, Francois Parmentier, Nancy Parodi, Pat Parodi, Stephen Parodi, Bennett Parrish, Helen Parselle, Jeanine Pasche, Ron Patella, Jo Patti, Bonnie Paull, Cindy Payer, Beatrice Payne, Graham Payne, Chip Payson, Sheri Payson, Jose-Luis Paz, Colleen Peabody, Dee Pearson, Dee-Dee Pearson, Delores Pearson, Rosie Peck, Sally Peck, Ernie Pecoraro, Nydia Pecoraro, Robert Pedersen, Karen Pedre, Patrizia Pedroza, Heidi Peens, Louis Peens, Antonella Peghin, Patrizia Pelizzari , Sylvie Pelletier, Andree Peloquin, Anne Peloquin, Diane Peloquin, Guy Peloquin, Michel Peloquin, Hector Pena, Fred Penna, Jeanette Penwell, David Percival, Antonio Perez, Arturo Perez, Elisa Perez, Jose Perez, Samuel Perez, Dennis Pero, Giugliana Peroni, Eliana Perotti, Silvio Perotti, Genevieve Perrin, Steven Perrin, Alessandra Pesce, Gisella Pesce, Silvia Pestiddo, Lynn Peters, Kifumi Peterson, Bradford Petit, Pino Petrotto, Angelo Petruolo, Marzia Pezzali, Don Pfendler, Linda Phillip, Christine Phillips, Diane Phillips, Michael Phillips, Maria Pia Gardini, Pier Piaceri, Laura Piazza, Lucio Piazza, Enzo Piccone, Isella Piccone, Patricia Piccone, George Pick Geoffrey Pick, Jean Pierre Deleze, Jean Pierre Lehman, Luciano Pietrobuoni, Giuseppe Pietrobuono, George Pilat, Irit Pillo, Bernard Pimont, Giovanni Pin</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
chietti, Claire Pinelli, Gustavo Pinto, Katharina Piotrowski, Colleen Piper, Collen Piper, Claire Pirelli, Alain Pitre, Letizia Pizzi, Dominic Pizzinat, Veronique Pizzinat, Ariel Podva, Daniel Podva, Marie-Louise Podva, Beatrice Pogouch Armando Pogoush, Dieter Pohlmann, Manuel Poiatti, Jean Poitras, Carl Polk, Dan Polk, Mireille Pollack, Fay Pollard, Ina Pollins, Mario Polverini, Maurizio Polverini, Bruce Pomaville, Martha Pomroy, martha Pomroy, Angelo Ponchetti, Maria-antonieta Ponchetti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchetti, Giovanni Ponchietti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchietti, Dick Pool, Cal Poole, Calvin Poole, Mark Poole, Fred Pope, Hermann Poppinga, Hans-Jorge Porner Claude Portais, Joanne Porter, Carlos Portillo, Paula Portmann, Joanne Portner, Graham Potter, Jack Potter, Christian Pouliot, Maria Pozzebon, Priscilla Presley, Leonie Price, Paul Price, Rosa Prieto, Clay Primrose, Earl Prince, Marty Prince, Nicolas Prince, Bruce Pringle, Carlyn Pringle, Carolyn Pringle, Daniela Prior, Tommy Pritzkau, Antonella Prosali, Massimo Prosperi, Peter Przybylla, Pia Pskowski, Hamida Puatti, Susana Puente, Marco Pugelli, Luisella Pugliatti, Hamida Puiatti, Wayne Pullen, Lee Purcell, Betsy Putterman, Larry Putterman, Michel Puzzolante, Sigrun Quetes, Rod Quinn, Bolivar Quinones, Francisco Quiroz, Ken Rabey, Nornie Rabey, Pat Rabey, Sheri Rabey, Janice Racheff, Jerry Racheff, Norma Rachel Brian Rackham, Helene Ract, Orelio Radaelle, Oreste Radaelli, Silvio Radaelli, Jerald Radroblo, Ron Radstrom, Leon Raffoul, Erika Rail, Rob Rainer, Aino Raisanen, Mauno Raisanen, Jaakko Raita, Pirjo Ramberg, Graciela Ramirez, Jaimes Ramirez, Lidia Ramirez, Norma Ramirez, Jose Ramon Amondarain, Eduardo Ramos, Giovanni Rampazzo, Mauro Rangeloni, Michel Raoust, Farhad Raschidi, Heidi Raschidi, Victoria Rashidi, Bruce Raston, Keith Raymond, Sandy Raymond, Joe Reaiche, Serge Rebeillard, Nelia Redondo, Nena Redtmann, Jan Regan, Sissy Reginato, Gayle Rego, Jim Rego, Marian Reguera, Sherwood Reichard, Brian Reichenberg, Helmut Reichert, Jean Reid, Gerhard Reile, Kathy Reilly, Eric Reinertaen, Felix Reinhard, Liliane Reinhard, Felix Reinhardt, Maggie Reinhart, David Reinken, Bruno Reisch, Richard Reiss, Manfred Renker, Gerard Renna, Karen Renna, Ian Rennie, Ann Rentachler, Lisa Rentschler, Brian Reso, Joan Reso, Michel Reveillere, Odile Reveillere, Virginia Rex, Edelia Reyes, Gino Reyes, Olivia Reyyes, Emil Rhodes, Mary Ribero, Gay Ribisi, Giuseppina Riccardi, Duane Rice, Mischa Rice, Arlene Rich, Frances Rich, Gary Rich, gary Rich, John Rich, Jean Richardson, Dan Richier, Harry Rickard, Dee-Dee Riechel, Frank Riemer, Paul-Unko Rieter, Nicola Rinaldi, Barbara Rinder, Ian Rinder, Jan Rinder, Crister Ringkvist, Fernando Rios, Gian-Luigi Ripamonti, Patricia Ripetta, Michael Rischer, Giancarlo Rivolta, Giovanna Rizetti, Giovanni Rizza, Carol Rizzardini, Giovanna Rizzetti, Costanzo Robasto, Francisco Robasto, Silvano Robasto, Don Roberts, Donald Roberts, Gracia Roberts, Lynn Roberts, Suzanne Roberts, Hunter Robertson, James Robertson, Maggie Robertson, Marguerite Robin, Allison Robinson, Mary Robinson, Myron Robinson, Patrick Robinson, Robbie Robinson, Dan Robison, Jose Robles, Ricardo Robotton, Francisco Rocha, Rene Rochat, Kathleen Roche, Kathy Roche, Craig Rocheau, Norma Rochelle, Michael Rock Mike Rock, Bonnie Rockwell, Jean Rockwell, Ginger Rodeghero, Linda Rodgers, Tony Rodgers, Jose RodriGuez, Susan RodriGuez, Antonia Rodriguez, Juan-Salas Rodriguez, Martin Rodriguez, Noemi Rodriguez, Gina Rogers, Mimi Rogers, Rick Rogers, Pablo Rohrig, Sabine Rohrig, Helena Rojo, Dennis Roland, Doc Roland, Kay Roland, Kaye Roland, Len Roland, Riccardo Romanini, Romano Romanini, Tiziana Romanini, Claudio Romano, Laura Romano, Patrizia Romano, Jose Romeo, Jose-Manuel Romero, Rocio Romero, Jorge Roncal, Bruno Ronchi, Ricardo Rosales, Louise Rose, Sandi Rosen, Sandy Rosen, Alain Rosenberg, Alain-Frank Rosenberg, Sarit Rosenberg, Charles Rosenkranz, Allyne Rosenthal, Jean Rosko, Gwen Ross, Ron Ross, Rino Rossetti, Alessandro Rossi, Giorgio Rossi, Christian Rossini, Marianne Rossini, Riccardo Rosso, Harry Rostig, Sandra Rostig, Marco Rota, Alon Roth, Bernard Roundhill, Karen Rounds, Cristina Roveyaz, Elaine Rowles-Poole, Susan Royal, Kristina Royce, Richard Royce, Jaime Ruane, Pat Rubey, Michael Rubin, Sy Rubin, Bet Ruddell, Steven Ruddell, Alfons Ruegg, Alfonse Ruegg, Gery Ruegg, Sleven Ruggiero, Guido Ruiu Hector Ruiz, Roberto Ruiz, Linda Rule, Giovanni Rusconi, Sara Russo, Margaret Rutherford, Susan Ryan Eastin, Gerard Ryan, Howard Ryan, Joan Ryan, Corry Ryke, Tony Ryke, Bernardo Sacchi, Bianca Sacchi, Vittorio Sacchi, Doug Sadwick, Douglas Sadwick, Nancy Sadwick, Fernando Sakuray, Marco Salame, Russell Salamon, Kenneth Salazar, Oscar Saldarriaga, Andres Saldivar, Tom Saliga, Mauricio Salinas, Ritva Salmela, Leon Salsberg, Matty Salsberg, Adriana Saltamerenda, Michael Saltz, Landru Salvo, Tony Sampson, Paolo San Agostino, Robert San Filippo, Roberto San Filippo, Alejandar Sanchez, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrea Sanchez, Benites Sanchez, Firmin Sanchez, Gisela Sanchez, Pilar Sanchez, Eileen Sanders, Sunny Sanders, Claude Sandoz, Diana Sandrin, Michel Sansfacon, Paolo Santagostino, Luis Santiago, Pablo Santiago, Alberto Santinato, Mavi Santinato, Graziella Santo, Massimo Santoro, Frances Santos, Hernan Santos, Laura Santos, Roberto Santos, Bonifacio Saponaro, Alberto Sarrocco, Ennio Sarrocco, Mike Savales, Andy Savas, Kathy Savas, Martha Savelo, Saveria Savocchia, Iris Sawtelle, Fabio Scarabelli, Alex Schabes, Volker Schalthoff, Denise Scherer, Guido Scherer, Theo Scherer, Olga Shermayer, Ursula Scherwinzer, Catherine Scherzinger, Denise Scherzinger, Rolf Scherzinger, Clarisse Schmid, Heinz Schmid, Dieter Schmitt, Heide Schnabl, Hermann Schnabl, Susan Schnabli, Anita Schneider, Ingeborg Schneider, Joanne Schnitzer, Ingeborg Schnitzler, Hilda Schoemaker, Paul Scholten, Martin Schonenberger, Jeanne Schrodinger, Hermann Schubotz, Claudia Schuhbock, Inge Schuhbock, Ruth Schuler, Peter Schultz, Dieter Schulz, Joseph Schumacher, Vreni Schurtenberger, Cheryl Schwalbe, Gerhard Schwandt, Carole Schwartz, Joe Schwartz, Pam Schwartz, Robert Schwartz, Judith Schwyter, Giorgio Scialuga, Flavio Sciotti, Jeannie Scoglio, Jeff Scott Jeffrey Scott, Karen Scott, Sonya Scott, Susan Seagal, Jon Sears, Bernadette Segal, Frank Seibert, Rob Seibert, Andy Seidler, George Seidler, Philip Seifleir, Marie Selosse, Jacques Senior, Maria Serato, Vincenzo Servidio, Vincenzo Servilio, Vincenzo Servodio, Jacob Sevilya, John Sexsmith, Mario Sgamarella, Pietro Sgaramelli, Peter Sgroi, Mike Shadowski, Anita Shain Reichenberg, Avishai Shalev, Bill Shannon, Pat Shannon, Hyam Shaull, Wendy Shaw, Rick Sheey, Hanna Shefi, Joanne Shelby, Larry Shelton, Kathy Shepard, Kathy Sheperd, Eric Sherman, Manon Sherman, Martin Sherman, Renee Sherman, Ron Sherwood, Bill Shields, Megan Shields, Chris Shipman, Ilana Shippony, Donald Showalter, Susan Shugart, Gloria Sierra, Joan Sigal, Jan Silber, Marc Silber, Penny Silber, Bruce Silton, Larry Silver, Dennis Simmons, Karen Simons, Tony Simpson, David Singer, Martine Sitbon, Gro Skov, Tina Slack, Benetta Slaughter, David Slaughter, Larry Sliver, David Sloane, Pascal Smakdji, Margaret Smidt Van Gelder, Brian Smith, Dieter Smith, Greg Smith, John Smith, Lena Smith, Louise Smith, Peter Smith, Steven Smith, Jessie Snow, Kathy Snow, Scott Snow, Peter Snyder, Deborah Sobocinski, Lawrence Sobocinski, Flavio Sofia, Tom Solari, Elena Soldati, Liesel Soley, Linda Solomon, Lee Some, Donna Sommer, Ann Sophie Wago, Beatrice Sopprarono, Ronit Soracco, Bengt Sorensen, Daniel Sorensen, Eric Sorensen, Scott Sorensen, Dick Sorenson, Josse-Luis Sosa, Jose-Maria Sousa, Vicki Southard, Maurizio Sozzi, Joe Spencer, John Spencer, Torrey Spencer, Michal Spencer-Smith, Paul Spencer-Smith, Massimiliano Speri, Ann Spielberg, Rick Spies, Jim Spina, Michael Spinelli, Jean Spinner, Fritz Spohn, Maggie Spohn, Bruno Spolenak, Jenny Sprecher, Stephen Spreecher, Luisa Sprefilio Richard Springsteed, Robert Sprungli, David St-Lawrence, Herbert Stahl, Maike-B Stahl, Hansueli Stahli, Darrell Staley, Aldo Stanzani, Roberto Stanzani, Chiara stanzani, Ch</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
ristina Staples, Peter Staples, Velli Stefneki, Rolf Steimer, Art Stein, Paul Stein, Cathy Steiner, George Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Lewis Steinman, Charles Stephens, George Stermer, Jennifer Stermer, Cheryl Stewart, Donna Stewart, Tony Stewart, Egon Stiebel, Edith Stockli, Ilse Storfer, Paul Storfer, Dan Stover, Joe Stover, Peter Stowes Travis Stracener, Betty Stradford, Dan Stradford, Gene Streett, Anne Strickland, Peter Strickler, Bengt Strom, Jeanine Struchen, Dominique Struder, Jo Struthers, Kathrin Stuckenbrock, Marilyn Stuckli, Brian Sturgeon, David Sturgiss, Gloria Suarez de Romero, Alberto Suarez, Denise Suarez, Maria Suarez, Leo Suchor, Bob Sudalnik, Susanne Sudalnik, Bonnie Sue Krumpe, Michael Suggs, Jon Supak, Margaret Supak, Jurgen Suplit, Libia Susana Calvete, Angela Sushko, Lana Susman, Marie Suter, Max Suter, Betty Sutphin, Herb Sutphin, Christian Svensson, Staffan Svensson, Sherry Swanson, Ralph Swarens, Paul Sweeny, Renee Swisko, Jim Sydejko, Linda Sydejko, Francois Sylvestre, Debbie Taffe, Joseph Taffe, Veikko Taivainen, Peter Talbot, Mitch Talevi, Pierre Tamboise, Harry Taplin, Roberto Tarabini, Serge Tardif, Tania Tarpico, Elena Tarqui, Jaime Tauchi, Berndt Taylor, Bruce Taylor, Claire Taylor, John Taylor, Sue Taylor, Pierre Tedeschi, Sylvie Tedeschi, Jaime Tello, Ralph Temps, Grace Ten Oever, Sax Ten Oever, Carmine Terra, Meri Tertelman, Aline Testa, Gerd Teutsch, Peter Thalmann, Laurent Theberge, Len Their, Marie Therese Meili, Yves Thibodeau, Marc Thies, Ann Thomas, Bob Thomas, David Thomas, Dina Thomas, Laurie Thomas, Meredith Thomas, Miguelle Thomas, Pat Thomas, Serge Thomas, Bruce Thompson, Frank Thompson, Raymond Thompson, Anne Thurston, Fatima Thut, Dottie Tillberg, Tomas Tillberg, Tina Tinbri, Chris Tingley, Alain Tizzioli, Don Tolan, Maureen Tolan, Ildiko Tombolini, Kristin Tomczak, Jacqueline Tomlinson, Stefano Tonellotto, Claudio Toppi, Ernesto Toro, Ricardo Toro, Graciela Torres Graciela Torres, Maria Torres, Miguel Torres, Ricardo Torres, Sergio Torres, Silvia Torres, Giullio Toso, Kader Toumi, Larry Trainor, larry Trainor, John Travolta, Nicole Tremblay, Pierre Tremblay, Daniel Tremblay, Anne-Marie Tremday, Angie Trent, Gian-Paolo Trivella, Gigi Troglio, Dave Tropf, Irv Trudell, Irving Trudell, Gunter Tschauder, Hans-Peter Tschudin, Susi Tschupp, Bill Tucker, Bodil Tucker, Stefan Tunedal, Philip Tunison, Paul Turnbull, Bruce Turner, Nancy Turner, George Turney, Andrea Turroni, Rudiger Tuschen, Catherine Tweed, Rusty Tweed, Vera Tweed, Enrique Ugarte, Maggie Uitz, Francesca Ulivieri, Anette Ungerman, Marian Upton, Alessandro Urbini, Mikel Urizarbarrena, Dario Usai, Franco Useri, Charlie Uslander, Ornella Vaccari, Marco Vaccarone, Mario Vaccarone, Marie-France Vachon, Nola Vains, Antonio Valentini, Hector Valenzuena, Jane Van Pelt, Jone Van Hoecke, Marc Van den Lynde, Michael Van Masters, Timothy Van De Pelt, Victoria Van Harasz, Eden Vanning, Manuel Vargas, Anita Vasquez, Cesar Vasquez, Sergio Vavalle, Jean Vavrus, Anita Vazquez, Frank Vedder, Judy Vedder, Enrique Vega, Manuel Vega, Maria Vega, Fredrich Veit, Manuel Velasco, Maria Velasco, Ricardo Velazquez, Jose Veloz, Diana Venegas, Sam Venti, Velia Vera, Yolanda Vergara, Susan Verger, Angela Vescovi, Norman Vespi, Marc Vianna, Anne Vicino, Elaine Vidal, Tania Vilchez, Tom Villaire, Val Villaluz, Jose Villareal Acosta, Antonieta Villareal, Antono Villareal, Jose Villareal, Maria Villareal, Rodrigo Villareal, Rudolfo Villareal, Jose Villarreal, Charni Vilnar, Angelina Vincent, Sylvie Vincent, Margarita Vinyallonga, Mireya Vinyallonga, Vera Vitale, Lore Vlemmings, Bob Voight, Christie Voight, Jon Voight, Steve Vollum, Giuseppe Volpari, Connie Von Adelung, Edith Von Thungen, Erik Vos, Marijke Vos, Sally Voss, Larry Voyer, Beatrice Vuille, beatrice Vuille, Erik Wagel Sorensen, Ann Wagle, Helga Wagner, Tom Waite, Peter Wakley, Marc Walby, Andrea Walker, David Walker, Doff Walker, Estelle Walker, Jack Walker, Jill Walker, Nancy Walker, Peter Walker, Rene Walker, Roger Walker, Rohn Walker, Margot Wall, Janie Wallace, Jim Wallace, Tony Walpert, Siegfried Walser, Marc Walter, Therese Wanner, George Ward, Lana Ward, Laura Ward, Bruce Warren, Jerry Watson, Susan Watson, Susie Watson-Taylor, Barey Wayne Critzer, Art Webb, Alice Webber, Bennet Webber, Carolyn Weber, Gerd Weber, Harriet Weber, Joan Weber, Maria Weber, Patricia Weber, Regula Weber, Winfred Weber, Paula Webster, Edouard Weesely, Doug Weigand, Judith Weigand, Judy Weigand, Scott Weigand, Nancy Weilgart, Peter Weis, Odile Weisgerber, Rebecca Weiss, Kathy Welch, kathy Welch, Brad Wells, Martha Wells, Ted Wells, Heidi Wendel, Janine Wenger, Marcel Wenger, Chris Wertin, Julien Wessenberger, Dorothy West, Kathy West, Kirk Westerman, Peggy Westerman, Jeanne Weston, Anette Westphal, Kjell Westphal, Joanne Wheaton, Bob Wheeler, Ellyn Wheeler, Janice Wheeler, Larry Wheeler, Lydia Wheeler, William Wherry, Tom Whipple, Betsy White, George White, Judy White, Rosalind White, Kurt Wicki, Monika Wieneke, Sherri Wiktor, Ruth Wilette, Peggy Wiley, Virgil Wilhite, Ernie Wilkens, Janet Wilkens, Cary Wilkins, Janet Wilkins, John Wilkins, Bob Wilkinson, James Wilkinson, John Wilkinson, Fran Willardson, Judith Willardson, Judy Willardson, Ruth Willett, Christine Williams, Dick Williams, Elizabeth Williams, Jack Williams, Karla Williams, Peter Williams, Eve Willner, Neil Willner, Barbara Wilson, Curt Wilson, David Wilson, Duke Wilson, Phil Wilson, Rosa Wilson, Ted Winegar, Dennis WInfrey, Gil Winter, Marge Wirick, Barbara Wiseman, Nikki Wiseman, Adele Witkin, Joan Witt, Judy Witt, Else-Margarete Wojan, Meggie Wojan, Nancy Wold, Barbara Wolf, Shirley Wolf, Mary Wolfe, Benjamin Wolff, Tova Wolff, Leslie Wolleinstein, Gus Wollitzer, Aurora Wong, Bill Wong, Harry Wong, Percy Wong, Roberto Wong, Claire Woodruff, John Woodruff, Diane Woods, Michael Woods, Neil Woods, Steven Woodworth, Diane Workman, Heinz Wrege, Sara Wright Lister, Bonnie Wright, Cyndy Wright, Chris Wrightsman, Pam Wrightsman, Bonnie Wubben, Bia Wunderer, Churlya Wurfel, Hubert Wurfel, Kathy Wydler, Verena Wyss, Alexandra Yacoulef, David Yanrenko, Richard Yared, Brenda Yates, Marie Yates, Bill Yaude, Kathy Yaude, Beat Yogel, Jeff Youmans, Ofelia Yunes, Wolfgang Zabel, Alberet Zack, Anders Zacks, Ed Zacks, Marjorie Zacks, Larry Zagler, Bill Zahn, Bill Zalin, Lorenzo Zambelli, Giovanni Zamboni, Arturo Zamora, Maria Zanaboni, Gianni Zanetti, Lucia Zangrandi, Jack Zani, Laura Zani, Pauline Zani, Peter Zani, Gisela Zapata, Rita Zarahn, Helga Zaun, Robert Zchwartz, Susan Zea, Irina Zecchina, Ivan Zecchina, Bob Zeltzer, Jose Zenas, Heinz Zepernick, Alfredo Zetune, Martha Zetune, Andrea Zhinaghi, Ros Ziebart, Edda Ziehe, Helmut Ziehe, Deborah Zimmatore, Peter Zimmatorre, Michael Zimmer, Oreste Zinaghi, Massimo Zocche, Waki Zollner, Diana Zottola, Glenn Zottola, Antonio Zucchelli, Beatrice Zulauf, Kaija Zulker, Paula Zulli, Harry Zunicky, Elena Zurloni, Giovanna Zurloni, Bryan Zwan, Robert Zwan, Kaspar Zwicky, Robert Zwiegers</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
</div>
<div style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/article.jpg" style="border: 0px currentColor; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-size: 13px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><img alt="Pierre Ethier" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-327" height="445" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/article.jpg?w=593&h=445" style="-webkit-box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902) 0px 1px 1px; background-color: white; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); box-shadow: 0px 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.14902); clear: both; display: block; height: auto; margin: 5px auto 1.5em; max-width: 100%; padding: 4px !important; width: auto;" width="593" /></a></div>
<h3 class="sd-title" style="background-image: none; border: currentColor; clear: both; color: black; float: left; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 1; margin: 3px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; position: static; text-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 1px 1px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; width: 93.75px;">
<span class="tag-links" style="border: 0px currentColor; font-family: inherit; font-size: 11px; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"></span></h3>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-10448462077603279872013-03-20T05:36:00.000-07:002013-03-24T08:50:41.550-07:00FUNDAMENTALISM<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg"><img alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII" class="size-medium wp-image-2933 aligncenter" height="300" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg?w=256" width="256" /></a></div>
<br />
<div align="center">
<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">FUNDAMENTALISM</span></b></div>
<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A new epithet has recently emerged out the Mind of the fanatics that are violently opposed to the tenets of Standard Tech and Best Practice: <b><i>FUNDAMENTALISM</i></b>, when describing the technical application of auditing and Hubbard inspired counseling.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Fundamentalism is defined as religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The fanatics behind that recurring train of thought have long preached the same thing:</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1- That training and Interning is unnecessary and that one can call himself an expert without any real experience and only the most cursory of studies of the materials. Those pushing that aberrant ideology are the first to denigrate the value of training and those who dedicated decades of their lives becoming true experts and professionals: in their minds and writings they spread their false propaganda that any self-certified Class IV with a few dozen hours experience is just as good (if not even better) than a Class XII with over 40,000 hours of experience and having completed over two dozen auditor Internships under Class XII Case Supervisors that had been trained and handpicked by L. Ron Hubbard himself.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2- That there is something inherently evil in adhering with true professionalism and meticulous care to the stricts standards and discipline that both common sense and L. Ron Hubbard himself are required to deliver competently the Upper Levels and those designed to <b><i>BYPASS THE NORMAL SELF-PROTECTION MECHANISM OF THE HUMAN MIND</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3- That wild and new ideas not based on a shred of scientific evidence or even having proven to achieve any kind of result are as valid, if not more than long proven principles. The aberrant notion being promoted by those fanatics is that somehow, sitting in their living room, sometimes helped by generous amounts of Beer and cigarette smoke, and without a formal education in anything beyond a High School diploma nor in the Mind, Philosophy or Spirit these self-proclaimed Geniuses have been able to accomplish in a few hours and on their own more than thousands of years of Science and more than decades of Intensive research by L. Ron Hubbard and the hundreds of people that helped him.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
According to their hidden philosophical views, a failed auditor who has never been able to graduate an Internship conducted under any Case Supervisor worthy of that name, never bothered to spend any time drilling or honing his skills and who has never been able to objectively prove he can produce uniform results is on an equal footing as someone who spent hundreds (if not thousands) of hours drilling and cramming so he could audit flublessly hundreds of cases.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4- Every single vice present in their own behavior, they accuse those they chose to denigrate by mislabeling them as "fundamentalist". They label as arrogant anyone insistent on sticking to professional standards and discipline. It never dawn on them that someone who was was too lazy to train properly, too selfish to persist in applying what has been proven by clinical tests to be "best practice" and that has never been successful in producing results consistently suddenly claiming that he is a World Authority and therefore entitled to denigrate and ridicule the true professionals in the same filed is not only the PAROXYSM of ARROGANCE, but delusional as well.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They typically realize that by peddling auditing in the same manner of Snake Oil Merchants of old, they can maximize financial gain while minimizing the amount of effort required. Those among that group of fanatics that are not after financial wealth, are after Power over other people's lives. Just like a perverse hypnotist who amuse himself by getting people he experiments on to act in funny ways or like animals, so are those who view people merely as guinea pigs to be experimented on. When they accuse true altruists people of delivering auditing with Professionalism and discipline of being con Men and only interested in Money, one can be certain that they are talking about themselves, a phenomenon known as Projective Identification in the Psychological Field and "similar Overts of one's Own" in Scientology. .</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
6- They normally claim to follow Standard tech. Some even redefine the word Standard (whose true meaning is a Universal yardstick) by claiming a Standard is simply following their own set of rules, that they keep inventing as they keep experimenting. They do that because most people that have been exposed to Scientology and the bulk of normal people distrust non-standard application, in particular those who violate the tenets taught by L. Ron Hubbard. In the same vein. very few people that are sane of Mind, would abandon their own Minds to experimental procedures that have been just been developed on a whim. Hence the typical desire to deceive by those fanatics. claiming their wild ideas are in the same class as those of true professionals. The desire to lure clients is the true motive. They are essentially being dishonest.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
7- They frequently promote aberrant and absurd notions that nobody outside the small world of the Freezone or Independent Field can agree with. Among the popular notions promoted by these individuals are the notion that some of them have Psychic Powers of such Magnitude that they are able to influence World Leader or Events through their mere thoughts. Yet the same individuals fail the simplest of logical tests in life and frequently their own lives and environment are in tatters.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another popular set of notion include variations on the theme that Aliens (often called Markabians) in remote galaxies or solar system have taken over the world of Scientology and are telepathically guiding it at a distance.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Or they can claim to be able to audit over the phone (or even through their "Superlative Telepatic abilities") and somehow get reads transference from the pc to the E-Meter to which they have connected themselves.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
While they are certainly entitled to any belief they wish to indulge themselves in, all too often, they seek to promote their ideas through the denigration of those they view as "competition". In their eyes someone with a lot of ideas not proven by any test and having no experience with a subject has a right to demand from a professional and expert in the subject to be called Peers and equals. The response to the statement that their knowledge, experience and skills do not measure up to the proven experts in the field is normally a violent an extremely vocal rebuttal through Ad Hominem attacks and the pernicious use of "Scientology Black PR".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Scientology Black PR is the tool used to spread lies about another whose dissenting views are perceived as a threat to one's vested interests.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Black PR has nothing to do with truth. Only with satisfying the private interests of the one sponsoring it.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One of the key trick of Black PR is the redefinition of terms or the labeling with incorrect attributes that which one seeks to harm or destroy.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By labeling professionalism, self-discipline and adhering to the standards of Best Practice as FUNDAMENTALISTS, the fanatic making use of the Black PR tool just mentioned seeks to aggrandize himself denigrating their opponents falsely associating the Ethical Practice of Scientology or Hubbard based counseling with a stigmatized word (normally meant to be used in a theological context, not a secular one such as auditing) and demonizing it. Fundamentalism in most people's Mind today has the meaning of RADICALISM or EXTREMISM, and a close association with the evils Religious Extremism has caused since 2001.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is nothing short of a Subliminal Message designed to propagate covertly the ridiculous notion that anyone disciplined enough to stick to BEST PRACTICE anchored in proven results is in fact some sort of EXTREMIST.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My message to the purveyors of the False data that anyone sticking to the discipline, standards and Professionalism associated with Standard Tech is a FUNDAMENTALIST</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
is for them to :</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1- GET OFF YOUR LAZY ASS and PROPERLY TRAIN so you can at least produce uniform results with a technology before you claim being such an expert in it that you can freely denigrate it.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2- STOP BEING DISHONEST by falsely labeling your ideas own ideas or those of your newly found Guru as Standard Scientology or directly from L. Ron Hubbard, when they simply are not. You certainly can believe and practice anything you want, but mislabeling is nothing but a form of parasitism seeking to leech on the proven record and hard work done by those who developed the technology or those who invested years of their lives honestly training in it. This especially applied to forged HCOBs and Rundowns created in the Freezone and misattributed to L. Ron Hubbard (like the Freezone version of SuperPower and OT 2 and OT 3 as currently taught by Ron's Org and their followers.) It entirely applies to the concepts of Telepathic, phone and Skype auditing as they directly contravene the principles of auditing as explained in Bulletins and lectures within Scientology. and actual Videos of sessions delivered by L. Ron Hubbard.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3- STOP CLAIMING TRAINING OR STATES OF BEING NOT ATTAINED. Some people have developed the notion that studying a Class VIII course pack in a few hours and listening to the Class VIII tapes (or more often, only reading their transcripts). with scores of missing materials such as the LRH |Class VIII C/Sed sessions, and no course supervision nor anyone to attest them makes them a FULL Class VIII on a par with those who trained and apprenticed for months on that Course. Or that you can now claim to be a Class XII auditor because you have been shown a bootleg Ls materials pack, devoid of all 50 theory HCOB covering those rundowns missing all LRH taped lectures on the subject and were taught by a provisional Class IV auditor who never trained at Flag himself. Or that having achieved an OT Level developed by someone else than LRH entitles you to be claim to be WITHOUT A CASE, no matter how nattery, reactive, make-wrong and restimulated you have become.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If your practice is centered mainly around your alleged extraordinary Psychic skills, such as being a world Class telepath capable of counseling and altering the behavior of a world Leader, or your claim of formidable telekinesis abilities that enables you to influence the needle of your emeter by channeling a pre-clear on the other side of the world, have the Integrity of getting your claims independently verified by somebody who is credible before demanding that you automatically be given the same status as those who studied and trained for decades while having dozens of fully qualified case Supervisors attesting the auditing as competent and standard.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The aberrant notions promoted by David Miscavige are in fact the very same ideology as the one promoted by the fanatics referred to in this essay, though under a different disguise. Their results tend to be the same as well.</div>
<br />
<em>(c) Pierre Ethier</em>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-13546793653932309502013-03-20T01:22:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:36:29.909-07:00AMPRINISTICS<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg"><img alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3064" height="300" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg?w=202" width="202" /></a></div>
<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">AMPRINISTICS</span></b></div>
<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b></b><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">WHAT IS IT?</span></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyone who has been deeply involved in Scientology, such as being on staff, the Sea Org or being part of delivering its services as an auditor, like I was, received continuous indoctrinations to make him/her accept all form of data without questioning it or even examining it. To the outsider, such data, when accepted by the recipient is correctly labeled as Dogma.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Most of my peers, swallowed one Dogma after another without giving it a second thought. Being of a somewhat different nature, I never could accept a datum without understanding it first. I was often criticized for it, but realized from the start that my personal Integrity depended on believing only in what I choose to believe in on my own, not what I was merely ordered to.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Divergent and Splinter Groups were uniformly labeled as Suppressive, thought it was never explained how they were so. My questions about what they were, their activities and in which way they supposedly harmed people were never answered, except by the universal platitudes: "They teach junk", "They are run by evil people with a discreditable past (or by perverts)" "They harm anyone they touch".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I distinctively remember coming across the word AMPRINISTICS and finding it impossible to locate a definition. My efforts at truly clarifying its meaning were strongly discouraged. The only thing I needed to know is that it was a Suppressive group seeking to Harm Scientology and run by criminals.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is only after I left the Church that I discovered (no thank to the Church of Scientology who has kept the issue hidden as it proved subsequently to be an embarrassment), what the word means or what it was.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
AMPRINISTICS is a made up word by its creator Harold Thompson (1922-1994) , when he left the Church around 1964 to pursue his own ideas. He was joined by Jack Horner*, who used to be one of L. Ron Hubbard most trusted friends and Edgar Watson, one of the top auditors at the time.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
*( Jack Horner was trusted enough for LRH to invite him to conduct by himself the 1st South African Advanced Clinical Course, as LRH had commitments elsewhere).</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
AMPRINISTICS is composed out of the words AMPLIATIVE (extending a simple concept) and PRINCIPLE (beginning/fundamental truth as basis of reasoning).</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I do not have enough information to properly evaluate the merits or drawback of that philosophy, since I have not been able to get my hands-on works that explain its procedures in details. In 2001, his widow, Nancy Gould Thompson published a book: "Amprinistics : the simple truth : the first scientific psychology" / Harold Thompson.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Amprinistics uses ideas that are found in Certainty Processing, Rising Scale Processing and Concept Therapy/Processing from 1951-1953 and combines them with ideas from R6EW (1962-1964) to seek to release sections of the Mind and specific aberrations.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Advertisement of Amprinistics promotes it as a senior form of Scientology and is extremely enthusiastic about claims of results. How accurate were their claims? It is impossible to tell. The church, prompted by L. Ron Hubbard himself has gone out of its way to destroy that group, its principals and anything it published.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
After a few years ,both Jack Horner and Edgar Watson left to start their own practices, no doubted prompted by the Intense Third partying campaign the Church instigated which had for avowed goal to get each of the founding members at each other's throat.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
L. Ron Hubbard got so ticked off about the group daring to use his ideas mixed with their own that he vowed the demise at any and all costs.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He started by writing an Executive Letter (the predecessor to LRHED) dated 27 September 1965 called AMPRINISTICS. That issue is now hard to find because it L. Ron Hubbard rhetoric and unproven assertions proved to be such an embarrassment, that the Church now denies its existence.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
L. Ron Hubbard starts by making a big deal of them being all allegedly homosexuals, in spite of the accusations later in that same issue that one of them had indiscriminately fathered multiple children and abandoned their mothers. It merely reflects on Hubbard homophobia and consequently the Church of Scientology viewing Hubbard's words as "scriptures" privately labeling all homosexuals as perverts and insane. They may something else in their PR, but I have read the pc folders of over 100 different Homosexuals and each of them was branded a pervert and insane by their case Supervisor. There were no exception.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hubbard continues with his generalities calling them thieves and criminals but never once giving the slightest details even vague ones. He then goes on stating; "We don’t really want them any harm".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier-plus-dreams.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier-plus-dreams" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3103" height="199" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier-plus-dreams.jpg?w=300" width="300" /></a>Contradicting himself, Hubbard continues on the next page: "They are each Fair Game, can be sued or harassed... Watson is a set-up for arrest as Homosexual. Any meeting held by them should be torn up. the names of people attending should be collected and they should be labeled SP, as they have left Scientology.(Now we have Hubbard clearly stating that if you leave or disagree with Scientology you are a Suppressive Person: something the Church of Scientology does with abandons, because L. Ron Hubbard says so)</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hubbard continues with his vitriol: "If any of them move in your area get them arrested or deported on whatever grounds".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>OUR POLICY:</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>(1) Do not Mention the name Amprinistics in public, in our magazines or issues.</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>(2) Harass these persons in any possible way.</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>(3) Label publicly their ideas as Suppressive and designed to deny people case gains.</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>(4) Tear up any meeting held and get the names of those attending and issue SP orders and you'll have a lot of rats.</i></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>L. Ron Hubbard 27 September 1965</i></b></div>
<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">EPILOGUE</span></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Amprinistics, never amounted to anything bigger than a few hundred adherents and therefore never threatened the Church of Scientology income. The Church has never published any account of a single person being harmed by that practice. If they had found any, they would have published them in all their gore. Therefore the inescapable conclusion is that AMPRINISTICS never harmed anyone nor anything except L. Ron Hubbard's pride. Harold Thompson survived L. Ron Hubbard by 8 full years. In 2001, the Amprinistics Society was still active, making Hubbard's forecast in 1965 that " in a few months will never be heard of again" entirely inaccurate</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-82042500664030907192013-03-15T09:16:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:33:32.592-07:00LIST OF LRH RECORDED LECTURES GIVEN IN 1969TAPED LECTURES<br/>In 1976 a FLAG TAPE MASTER LIST was compiled and issued. It had a few omission, but was by far the most complete list ever done by the Church.<br/><br/>In the 1990s, the late Ken Ogger who gave himself for nickname "THE PILOT" published the most exhaustive list of LRH conferences ever made. Using my own unique background as a Class XII and Sea Org Member on Tech lines at Flag for nearly 20 years and numerous contacts and sources of help.<br/><br/><em id="__mceDel">I have filled the holes in the Pilot list and explained the current status of each lecture.</em><br/><br/>Since the advent of the Golden Age of Tech a number of lectures have been quietly buries and the very name and existence of those conferences been erased from Scientology official teaching. The Church current position is that those lectures never existed, even though they exit in previous compilations. The Church has ordered destruction of those conferences by any of the faithfuls who still happen to own one.<br/><br/>None of the lectures given by L. Ron Hubbard in 1969 are part of the GOLDEN AGE OF KNOWLEDGE. NONE OF THEM ARE LISTED IN THE NEW TECH VOLUMES ISSUED IN 1991.<br/><br/>Except for the Welcome to the Sea Org Lectures, all of the following conferences have been quietly buried and in the 1990s ordered destroyed by organizations who had them .<br/><br/>The transcripts for tapes marked with an X have been leaked out and are available outside the Church.<br/><br/>This list includes 9 lectures that are not on the original FLAG MASTER LRH TAPE LIST nor the PILOT TAPE LIST.<br/><br/>LIST OF LRH RECORDED LECTURES GIVEN IN 1969:<br/>February 02 R-Factor Talk To Registrars (1959) LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS AND LISTS BY ERROR - TAPE IS FROM 1959, NOT 1969<br/>May 27 Planning Operations and Actions CONFIDENTIAL AIDES ONLY<br/>May 29 First Standard Dianetics Graduation Dianetic Program X LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - NOT ON ANY SCN COURSE AFTER THE 1974 HSDC<br/>September 01 Flag Central Command Area-its Security and Activities CONFIDENTIAL AIDES ONLY<br/>October 15 WSO-1 THE QUALITY OF THE SEA ORG AND WHAT IS A SEAMAN x LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - PART OF SEA ORG BASICS TRAINING<br/>October 16 WSO-2 Welcome to the Sea Org Drills x LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - PART OF SEA ORG BASICS TRAINING<br/>October 17 WSO-3 Why the Sea Org Is Successful x LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - PART OF SEA ORG BASICS TRAINING<br/>October 20 WSO-4 Third Dynamic Activity and Making Things Go Right x LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - PART OF SEA ORG BASICS TRAINING<br/>October 21 WSO 5 It Is a PRO World x LISTED IN OLD TECH VOLS - PART OF SEA ORG BASICS TRAINING<br/>October 30 New Flag Management System CONFIDENTIAL AIDES ONLY<br/>November 02 Covert Operations AIDES CONFERENCE X CONFIDENTIAL PR AND GUARDIAN OFFICE HATS ONLY<br/>November 06 COVERT OPERATIONS X CONFIDENTIAL FLAG ORG OFFICER CONFERENCE<br/>November 12 PRO AREA CONTROL x CONFIDENTIAL PR AND GUARDIAN OFFICE HATS ONLY<br/>December 10 Actions on OK CONFIDENTIAL AIDES ONLY<br/>December 13 Programmes 1970 CONFIDENTIAL AIDES ONLYAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-22803151608932949782013-03-15T09:10:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:33:32.586-07:00Complete list of all Technical Issues-1969<p style="text-align:justify;">The following is an exhaustive and complete list of all Technical Issues published along with their status. As a rule all issues written by someone else than LRH have been cancelled, even if doing so caused knowledge or vital advice to be lost. For example: Bulletins about Triple Rudiments have never been replaced and as a result, almost every auditor in the field have been mis-running Triple or Quad Rudiments. Scores of detailed drills covering anything from Handling Audiences to auditing correctly every processes on the Grades or actual Case Remedies have been cancelled without ever being replaced.</p><br/><br/>The first year that has been compiled is the year 1969. Unless specified otheerwise, all issues are HCOBs<br/>DATE TITLE STATUS<br/><br/>January 05 UNRESOLVING CASES - ADDITIONAL NOTE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>January 08 DRUGS AND INSANITY NON-COMPLIANCE AND ALTER-IS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>January 23 THE STANDARD CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>January 24 SUB-ZEROS TRIPLE GRADES LOWER LEVELS TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>January 24 SUMMARY REPORT * CANCELLED<br/>January 25 TARGETS AND COMPUTERS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>January 25 TRIPLE LOWER GRADES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>January 28 HANDLING TRIPLE * CANCELLED<br/>January 29 TRIPLE AND EXTERIOR * CANCELLED<br/>January 30 TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED<br/>February 03 TRIPLE GRADES FLOWS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>February 03 TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>February 07 THE BODY COMM PROCESS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY DR JARVIS AND OTTO ROOS REISSUED 1970 AS HCOB ATTRIBUTED TO LRH<br/>February 09 Research Notes RE THE TRIPLE GRADES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>February 11 USE OF TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED<br/>February 12 L4A FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING QUESTIONS SEE HCOB 15 DEC 68<br/>February 14 CASE ENTRY - CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS * CANCELLED<br/>February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS - TR20 CANCELLED<br/>February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS - TR21 CANCELLED<br/>February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS - TR22 CANCELLED<br/>February 28 MEDICAL DOCTORS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>March 03 CASE GAIN COMPLETING LEVELS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>March 12 AUDITOR'S REPORT TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>March 12 PHYSICALLY ILL PCS AND PRE OTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>March 14 IT IS OK FOR ANY CLASS VIII * CANCELLED<br/>March 17 POLITICS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>March 17 Summary Report Form Auditor Admin Series 12RA CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 02 DIANETIC ASSISTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 05 NEW PRECLEARS The Workability of Scientology CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 06 DIANETICS COURSE AUDITING REQUIREMENTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 06 FUNDAMENTAL AUDITING CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 11 DIANETIC HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS<br/>April 11 TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED<br/>April 15 PTP RUDIMENT CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>April 16 HEALTH FORM, USE OF OLD TECH VOLS<br/>April 17 DIANETIC CASE FAILURES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 17 DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 22 DIANETICS vs SCIENTOLOGY CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 22 SOMATICS AND OTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 23 DIANETICS BASIC DEFINITIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 23 DIANETICS ERASURE HOW TO ATTAIN OLD TECH VOLS<br/>April 23 PAST LIVES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 23 BASIC DEFINITIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 24 DIANETIC RESULTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 24 DIANETIC USE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 24 PRECLEAR ASSESMENT SHEET OLD TECH VOLS<br/>April 26 BAD INDICATORS CANCELLED<br/>April 26 SOMATICS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 27 DIANETIC FAILURES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 27 R-3-R Restated COMMANDS ON SECOND RUN ON AN INCIDENT OLD TECH VOLS<br/>April 28 HIGH TA IN DIANETICS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 29 ASSESSMENT AND INTEREST CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>April 30 AUDITOR TRUST CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 01 GRINDING OUT ENGRAMS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 04 DIANETICS MAJOR AUDITING FAULTS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 05 TOUCH ASSISTS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 06 DIANETICS AND REVIEW CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 06 ROUTINE 3-R REVISED ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 07 DIANETIC COURSE STUDY DRILLS * CANCELLED<br/>May 07 DIANETICS EXTRACTS FROM EARLY BULLETINS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 07 FLOATING NEEDLE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 07 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR’S REPORT, W/S... CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 07 THE FIVE GAEs CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 08 IMPORTANT STUDY DATA CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 08 REPETITIVE STUDY CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE<br/>May 08 TEACHING THE DIANETICS COURSE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 09 CASE SUPERVISING (New Era) DIANETICS FOLDERS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 09 CASE SUPERVISOR FORMS OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 09 SUPERVISION DRILLS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE<br/>May 11 FORCING A PC CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 11 METER TRIM CHECK CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 13 PECULIARITIES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 14 CULTURAL LAG CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 14 DIANETIC ASSISTS OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 14 FN AND ERASURE OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 14 SICKNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 15 DIRTY NEEDLE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 17 TRS AND DIRTY NEEDLES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 18 ERASURE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 19 DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES PRIOR ASSESSING CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 19 HEALTH FORM, USE OF A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF AUDITING OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 19 PASTORAL COUNSELLING HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 19 DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES PRIOR ASSESSING OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 20 DIANETICS COURSE DATA OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 20 KEEPING DIANETICS WORKING IN AN AREA CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 21 ASSESSMENT CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 22 DIANETICS ITS BACKGROUND CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 22 NOTES ON CS INSTRUCTIONS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>May 23 AUDITING OUT SESSIONS NARRATIVE VERSUS SOMATIC CHAINS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 24 DIANETIC HIGH CRIMES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 24 THE DIFFICULT CASE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 25 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT OLD TECH VOLS<br/>May 26 DIANETICS STUDY AND DRILLS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>May 27 EARLIER SIMILAR * CANCELLED<br/>May 27 THE VIII's NIGHTMARE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 28 DIANETICS AND RESULTS DIANETIC COUNSELING GROUPS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>May 28 HOW NOT TO ERASE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>June 03 TR NOTES CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 04 COMM IMPEDIMENTS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 05 TWO DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>June 06 CRAMMING CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 06 PREDICTION AND CONSEQUENCES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>June 07 DIANETICS POINTS WHICH GO OUT AND WRECK PCs CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>June 07 HOW TO MAKE A PERSON SOBER CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>June 10 LANGUAGE DICTIONARIES AND TRANSLATIONS CANCELLED J.EGGERS CL VIII<br/>June 11 MATERIALS, SCARCITY OF CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>June 12 7 CASES R3R SET UP CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 13 THE 3 WAY S and D CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 19 DEFINITION OF TERMS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE<br/>June 23 FN OLD TECH VOLS<br/>June 26 CLASS VIII PRE-AUDITING REQUIREMENTS. * CANCELLED<br/>June 26 C/S—How to Case Supervise Dianetics Folders ** CANCELLED<br/>June 26 ENGRAMS, HANDLING OF AND OTs ** CANCELLED<br/>June 27 Q and A CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>June 28 HOW TO CASE SUPERVISE DIANETICS FOLDERS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 01 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 03 HEALTH FORM AND SOMATICS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>July 04 AUDITING OF OT III PRECLEARS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 04 DIANETICS STUDENT AUDITORS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 05 Q and A CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>July 10 STENOGRAPHIC AUDITING CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 10 EXTERIORIZATION REMEDY CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 10 FORMER THERAPIES AND EARLIER PRACTICES * CANCELLED<br/>July 11 SUPERVISION CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 12 AMENDMENT TO 5 JUNE 1969, TWO DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 12 EXTERIORIZATION CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 12 STARTING DIANETICS ON PCS WHO HAVE HAD SCIENTOLOGY AUDITING CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 12 THE PC WHO HAS SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 16 URGENT IMPORTANT FAILED SESSIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 17 FLAGRANT AUDITING ERRORS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 17 AMENDMENT AND ADD. TO CLASS VIII CS BULLETIN OF 10 DEC 1968 CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 17 (NEW ERA) DIANETIC COMMAND TRAINING DRILLS TR 101 AND 102 CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 18 DIANETICS AND VIII CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS<br/>July 19 AUDITING PRE-OTS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 19 DIANETICS AND ILLNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 21 ONE-HAND ELECTRODES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 21 R6-EW ** CONFIDENTIAL R6EW ONLY<br/>July 22 AUDITING SPEED CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 22 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT OLD TECH VOLS<br/>July 22 PASTORAL COUNSELLING HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS<br/>July 22 UNFLAT CHAINS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>July 22 AUDITING SPEED OLD TECH VOLS<br/>July 23 AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT PLICIES CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 23 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT AUDITING SPEED OLD TECH VOLS<br/>July 24 SERIOUSLY ILL PCS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 26 BODY AND STANDARD * CANCELLED<br/>July 27 BPL WHAT IS A CHECKSHEET BPL<br/>July 27 ANTIBIOTICS OLD TECH VOLS<br/>July 27 HIGH TA AND ERASING * CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY PEACHES POOK<br/>July 29 THE ART OF CASE SUPERVISION CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>July 30 STUDENT PROGRESS BOARD CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE<br/>August 02 LX LISTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 03 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 04 LX3 OLD TECH VOLS<br/>August 09 CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS, DIANETICS OLD TECH VOLS<br/>August 09 LX1 (Conditions) CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 09 CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS, (NEW ERA) DIANETICS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 12 DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>August 12 HANDWRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS - OT III CONFIDENTIAL OT III<br/>August 12 CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII ONLY<br/>August 12 CONFIDENTIAL - CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII OT III<br/>August 15 FLYING RUDS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 16 HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>August 21 TR 104 NOTE CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE<br/>August 25 CONFIDENTIAL - ADD OT III CS OT III<br/>August 25 DEFINITION OF ARCU CDEI * CANCELLED<br/>August 26 FAILED OT CASES CONFIDENTIAL CLASS VIII<br/>August 26 CONFIDENTIAL - OT III CASE SUPERVISION OT III<br/>September 02 CANC OF BULLS 22 May 69 CS INSTR, 27 JUN 69 Q AND A CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>September 02 DIANETICS THE E-METER DEFINED CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII<br/>September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES EDUCATION BY DUPL AND REPETITION CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC<br/>September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES EDUCATION BY EVAL OF IMPORTANCE CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC<br/>September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES GROUP TEACHING BY DEF AGREEMENT CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC<br/>September 18 DIANETICS AUDITING AND OT III CONFIDENTIAL OT III<br/>September 19 STUDY SLOWNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>October 01 CONFIDENTIAL - OT VIII CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII<br/>October 03 DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5<br/>October 03 URGENT - IMPORTANT LX 3 HANDLING OF * CANCELLED<br/>October 05 DIANETIC TRIPLES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>October 05 TRIPLE FLOWS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>October 05 UNRESOLVING CASES OLD TECH VOLS<br/>October 06 TRIPLE ERRORS IN DIANETICS OLD TECH VOLS<br/>October 07 CONFIDENTIAL (OT III and above only) ** OT III<br/>October 08 CONFIDENTIAL - OT III REMEDIES (OT III and above only) ** OT III<br/>October 12 CONFIDENTIAL - SECRET - LDN OT III OT III<br/>October 12 DIANETIC TRIPLES PLURAL ITEM CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>October 12 FORCING A PC OLD TECH VOLS<br/>October 13 CLEARING COURSE CHARGE CONFIDENTIAL CLEARING COURSE ONLY<br/>October 13 CONFIDENTIAL - OT III ERRORS CONFIDENTIAL OT III<br/>October 17 DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>October 25 CONFIDENTIAL - SECRET - OT III ONLY CONFIDENTIAL OT III<br/>November 05 FOLDER SUMMARY CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5<br/>November 05 GF TO FN * CANCELLED<br/>November 05 LX 3 (ATTITUDES) CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>November 05 RE PREPCHECKS * CANCELLED<br/>November 14 Medical Charts FO 2187 ISSUED AS HCOB IN 1991<br/>November 15 CASE SUPERVISION AUDITING AND RESULTS CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>November 15 CASE SUPERVISION, HOW IT GOES NON-STANDARD CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>November 19 GF40 OUT OF VALENCE CASE CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5<br/>November 20 SOME WORD DEFINITIONS FOR STUDENTS USE CANCELLED - WRITTEN BY MARY ROBINSON<br/>November 23 STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE CURRENT TECH VOLS<br/>December 02 RISING TA CURRENT TECH VOLSAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-17368311925682583452013-03-15T09:03:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:33:32.571-07:00Keep Scientology Working (KSW)<p align="center"><a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3064" alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg?w=202" width="202" height="300" /></a></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">HOW TO KEEP SCIENTOLOGY FROM WORKING:</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">ABANDON ANY PART OF ITS TECHNOLOGY THAT CONFLICTS WITH PRIVATE INTERESTS OF ITS PRINCIPALS</span></b><b></b></p><br/>People who have been running Scientology have not always had the most Ethical of Intentions. In fact, those running it for the last three decades have had intentions that have nothing to do with the improvement of people or their reaching true enlightenment.<br/><br/>It is common place among the criminal to accuse others of what they are themselves doing and therefore hide (they think) their true misdeeds by labeling them as being the opposite of what they truly are.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE HIDDEN OBJECTIVES OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH</span></b></p><br/>The Golden Age of Tech is yet another example. it should have been called the Age of Darkness.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">PRIMARY OBJECTIVE</span></b></p><br/>The primary objective of the Golden Age of Tech is to "wipe clean the slate of auditors" by cancelling any certificate ever obtained (even under L. Ron Hubbard himself) and ordering them to lengthy retrains where auditors will be re-educated in the application of auditing.<br/><br/>Compare it to the following definition:<br/><br/>A systematic effort to eliminate an individual's former loyalties and beliefs and to substitute them for a new ideology. It is best achieved by isolating and/or disconnecting from any anyone with divergent ideas, the insistence on exacting regimens that are not to be challenged or questioned, strong social pressures and rewards for cooperation; physical and psychological punishments for noncooperation, including social ostracism and criticism, deprivation of food, sleep, and social contacts, bondage, and torture; and constant reinforcement.<br/><br/>The above is the <b>DEFINITION OF BRAINWASHING</b>!<br/><p align="center"> <b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SECONDARY OBJECTIVE</span></b></p><br/>The secondary objective of the Golden Age of Tech is to implant the unimpeachable datum that RTC is infallible in technical matters and that any technical edict it issues should never be questioned, under penalty of excommunication and eternal damnation. This will prove vital in getting all auditors under the control of the Church to blindly accept radical transformations in definitions and the technology without even needing to publish new bulletins,and accepting any verbal Tech issued by RTC as "undisputable truth".<br/><br/>Thus we have the <b><i>definition of a Floating Needle being perverted </i></b>and causing thousands of unnecessary overruns.<br/><br/>This we have the Fabulous <b><i>Ls Rundowns have been completely transmogrified </i></b>and now being run according to lower level styles and techniques instead of their own unique ones, and over 50% of recipients at Flag being greatly unhappy (or worse) with them.<br/><br/>Thus we have the invention of the datum that people auditing on Solo NOTs must learn "<b><i>How to Kill and F/N" </i></b>and disavow their wins in order to benefit the Church through statistics and/or income.<br/><br/>Thus we have people being<b><i> audited for hours over ARCXs </i></b>with the auditor purposefully ignoring them because of some arbitrary or false datum he has been indoctrinated in.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">TERTIARY OBJECTIVE</span></b></p><br/>The tertiary objective of the Golden Age of tech are 1- to remove any call to judgment or understanding by auditors and replace it with inflexible rules and robotic protocols.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">QUARTERNARY OBJECTIVE</span></b></p><br/>The quaternary objective is the adoption of the false datum that any auditor or Case Supervisor applying fanatically the Golden Age of tech procedures can not possibly err. The corollary of that false axiom is that any and all complaints or disagreements about the programming, auditing or C/Sing merely indicate undisclosed misdeeds by the complainant(s).<br/><br/>Since the creation of the Golden Age of Tech, over half of the Solo NOTS completion have either openly defected or quietly departed from the Church. and nearly as many OT VIIIs. Church membership has dwindled by 60%. LRH repute has been torn to shred in the Media and on Internet and the Church under its current leadership has done nothing whatsoever to stop that trend, but only preoccupying itself at "defending David Miscavige" whenever he was justly attacked and criticized for his crimes.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">HOW RTC HAS CORRUPTED THE TECH AND BETRAYED SCIENTOLOGY</span></b></p><br/>When the Golden Age of tech was announced in 1996, the "Discovery" by David Miscavige was that the "Blind had been leading the Blind". Nothing was said about the inescapable facts that<br/><br/>1- RTC by definition was the one leading on technical matters, and therefore being "The Blind"<br/><br/>2- Being Blind in that context (having low perception) is entirely the product of hidden misdeeds and contra-survival acts.<br/><br/>3- Therefore, announcing that RTC was entirely responsible for the Technology being applied the way it was (wrongly), Scientology public were expected to continue to blindly trust the same group of thugs that David Miscavige was broadcasting as having betrayed its public.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE 10 COMMANDMENTS ACCORDING TO RTC</span></b></p><br/>Since the Advent of RTC, in the 1980s, the Church of Scientology has completely failed in its mission of "Keep Scientology Working". It has focused almost exclusively at controlling people, typically through Terror and the destruction of anyone who "had other Fish to fry" (an expression that has come to mean doing or thinking anything that is not written in the new Tables of the Law written by RTC. The Laws being:<br/><br/>1- Thou shalt not question nor doubt any rule or order issued by or on behalf or RTC, no matter how off-policy or destructive it may seem to be.<br/><br/>2- Thou shalt submit all of your dynamics under the control and orders of the Church and accept all directives to suppress one or more dynamics, including Divorce, Abortion or Disconnection without challenge or disobedience.<br/><br/>3- Thou shalt lie and deceive even under oath, if it benefit the Church without feeling there is the slightest wrong in doing so.<br/><br/>4- Thou shalt not save any money for yourself, your future or your children, but donate without examination everything you own to the Church. You will get into debt without any limitation as long as you keep being ordered to do so by a Church official.<br/><br/>5- Thou shall disconnect as destructively as possible from anyone who disagrees with the Church, the way it is being run or who criticizes any of its principals.<br/><br/>6- Thou shalt refuse to listen to any communication or examine any data that seek to prove or explain how you may have been lied to by the Church, declaring that anything unflattering about the Church or its principals is by definition entheta and a lie.<br/><br/>7- Thou shalt accept any orders to apply Scientology, its Tech or its Admin differently than you have learned if RTC orders it as they know better than anyone else.<br/><br/>8- Disavow or disconnect from your Father and Mother, sisters and brothers, spouse or children whenever it is ordered to by an Ethics Officer.<br/><br/>9- Never doubt anything you are told at any Church Briefing or official publication, nor ever try to confirm their accuracy. Use the Internet solely for purposes immediately related to your job and refuse to read anything about Scientology, the Church or any of its principals, as the Church of Scientology never lies to its members.<br/><br/>10- Only follow goals of yours that are directly and explicitly approved by the Church. Change your goals, the instant you are told by an Ethics Officer or other authorized Church personnel that they are wrong. Disregard the Code of Honor. It is only written for PR purposes.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">STEP 0 OF KSW</span></b></p><br/>Over the course of years an additional step has surreptitiously been added to the 10 points of KSW:<br/><br/>Step 0 of KSW: Abandon the Technology, or least the bits that those in charge want discarded to satisfy their political or financial interests. Hundreds of good Bulletins have been cancelled and never been replaced. Thousands of mental or spiritual breakthroughs been ignored or suppressed and parts of the technology developed by L. Ron Hubbard been kept indefinitely storage, in order to maximize financial gain by the Church of Scientology.<br/><br/>The following links show by year an exhaustive and complete list of all Technical Issues published along with their current status (where they can be found, of if cancelled or suppressed).<br/><br/>As a rule all issues written by someone else than LRH have been cancelled, even if doing so caused knowledge or vital advice to be lost. For example: Bulletins about Triple Rudiments have never been replaced and as a result, almost every auditor in the field have been mis-running Triple or Quad Rudiments using wrong or out-tech commands.<br/><br/>Scores of detailed drills covering anything from Handling Audiences to auditing correctly every processes on the Grades or actual Case Remedies have been cancelled without ever being replaced.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">LIES IN THE PROMOTION OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH</span></b></p><br/>Decades after the wholesale cancellation of hundreds of Drills, an Impostor, who is also a failed auditor and an acknowledged NO CASE GAIN and who shows NO CHANGE as a down stat administrator created something he calls the GOLDEN AGE OF TECH, largely plagiarizing earlier cancelled bulletins that were written by Class XIIs and other Highly trained individuals as ordered by L. Ron Hubbard. He falsely claimed authorship behind them, defaming earlier Class XIIs and Highly trained auditors who had complied with LRH orders to create drills for every single occasion, lying in front of an audience of thousands claiming that LRH orders had never been complied with when they had.<br/><br/>Hundreds of bulletins gave vital technical advice and examples of application, but were cancelled without replacement nevertheless. This includes Bulletins on auditing Autistic Children, The secret reason why OTs can cave in or act badly, dynamic assessments and many other subjects.<br/><br/>It is immutable policy in the Church of Scientology, to cancel every single bulletin or materials written by a person who has just fallen out of favor or been branded suppressive, even if no replacement or substation is made. As a result there are gaping holes in the training auditors and errors and mistakes that would have been easily avoided have been committed in the name of "Keep Scientology Working" when the slogan KEEP SCIENTOLOGY WORKING was merely a hypocritical front for people who had no interest in the betterment of others so that they could order the demonizing and vilifying anyone who dared disagreeing or thinking an independent unsanctioned thought.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">COMPLETE OF ALL TECHNICAL ISSUES EVER PUBLISHED</span></b></p><br/>Due to the large amount of work required to make such a list, it is being done,one year at a time.<br/><br/>The first year that has been compiled is the year 1969.<br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">COMPLETE OF ALL TAPED LECTURES EVER PUBLISHED</span></b></p><br/>In 1976 a FLAG TAPE MASTER LIST was compiled and issued. It had a few omission, but was by far the most complete list ever published by the Church.<br/><br/>In the 1990s, the late Ken Ogger who gave himself for nickname "THE PILOT" published the most exhaustive list of LRH conferences ever made and sought to correct and add to it.<br/><br/>Using my own unique background as a Class XII and Sea Org Member on Tech lines at Flag for nearly 20 years and numerous contacts and sources of help, I have filled the holes in the Pilot lists and explained the current status of each lecture.<br/><br/>Since the advent of the Golden Age of Tech a number of lectures have been quietly buried and the very name and existence of those conferences been erased from scientology official teaching. The Church current position is that those lectures never existed, even though they exit in previous compilations. The Church has ordered destruction of those conferences by any of the faithful who still happen to own one.<br/><br/>For the year 1969 the Golden Age of Knowledge states that "No LRH lecture exists", yet I was able to confirm by title and date 13 LRH lectures made that year.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-11846294923388439122013-03-14T16:20:00.000-07:002013-03-24T08:55:56.367-07:00Church of Scientology Erasing Founder's SonAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-43414056912557530512013-03-14T02:08:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:33:32.551-07:00Suppressive Groups<p align="center"><a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3064" alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii-auditor.jpg?w=202" width="202" height="300" /></a></p><br/><p align="center"><b>WHO OR WHAT IS A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP?</b></p><br/><p align="center"><b>ARE SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS TRULY SUPPRESSIVE</b><b>?</b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">DEFINITION</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">L. Ron Hubbard originally defined the concept of Suppressive Groups in a Policy Letter dated 29 June 1968 (<i>Enrollment in Suppressive Groups</i>).</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">He stated "<b>SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS</b>, are defined as those which seek to destroy Scientology or which specialize in injuring or killing persons or damaging their cases or which advocate the suppression of mankind".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">However, in actual practice, the Church of Scientology (and Hubbard himself for that matter), has branded as Suppressives anyone who started a splinter or divergent group.</p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE TRUTH:</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">WHAT TRULY CAUSES A GROUP TO BE BRANDED SUPPRESSIVE</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">By actual record, the Church of Scientology declares as Suppressive:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- Any splinter group, whatever were their motives or activities.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- Any whistleblower or group denouncing illegal acts performed or ordered by the Church of Scientology or any of its principals.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- Anyone refusing to comply with orders issued by the Church Elite, no matter how much these may contravene approved policy or the published aims of Scientology.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">4- Anyone found to be applying Scientology, or a derivative of it without the official approval or without the paying of tithes to the Church of Scientology. Contrarily to any mainstream Church, unqualified and untrained people will make the assessment of such activities and uniformly find them to be bad and harmful without any real investigation or competence to do so..</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">5- Any organization whose principals are known by the Church of Scientology to be former members and that teaches anything of a mental, Spiritual or Religious nature, even when it has no real connection with Scientology nor seeks to compete with it.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">6- Any group or Association that has copied ideas found in Scientology or L. Ron Hubbard writings and seek to apply them, without the official approval of the Church of Scientology and the payment of large amounts of royalties. This especially applies to any new Churches created in accordance with the laws of the land.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">7- Any group of individuals that seeks to challenge the activities of the Church of Scientology or its leaders, even when invoking the writings of L. Ron Hubbard and the original materials written by Hubbard in the 1950s, which the current Church of Scientology is very fond of calling <b><i>scriptures</i></b>.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A exhaustive and impartial analysis of top 50 splinter or dissenting group from the Church of Scientology reveals the following facts:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE FACTS: </span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE TRUE ATTRIBUTES OF SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- Each and every Splinter/Divergent group purported and sought to promote the ideas contained in Scientology and consistent with its philosophy. This includes the entirety of what is labeled as "FREEZONE" or Independent Field. Therefore far from suppressing Scientology, they uniformly tried to promote it. <b><i>FACT: Splinter/Divergent Groups do not seek to suppress Scientology.</i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- People who have claimed that a splinter Group or FREEZONE/Independent caused someone's actual injury or Death are very few in number (less than 3%) and every instance dates from the 1990s or the 21st Century as a small clique of particularly unethical, poorly trained and ignorant individuals started to rule or influence the key factions of the Freezone/Independent Field . The majority of the assertions of actual harm or death in the Freezone/Independent Field are anonymously made and easily traceable to the Church of Scientology or its agents. Since the Church of Scientology is among the most DEAD-AGENTED organization on the planet (except in the blind eyes of its fanatical promoters and OSA agents/collaborators), the validity of those claims is very easy to dispute.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">On the other hand, the number of people documented with claims that the Church of Scientology has caused injury or contributed directly to the death of people is in the high Hundreds, or perhaps in the thousands. All one has to do is use the Internet Search Engine or visit the detailed files contained thousands of different accounts, testimonies and News media stories in the Internet web sites that are dedicated to the denunciation of abuses by the Church of Scientology.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">1001- TH WAY TO DIE</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A statistical analysis and study of <b><i>OTs</i></b> remaining faithful to the Church reveal a truly scary trend: Life expectancy for them is a mere 57 years of age: that is 20 to 25 years below the national average for all but the poorest and under-developped countries on Earth. Active membership and participation in the Church of Scientology current activities ought to be labeled: <b><i>"the 1001th way to die</i></b>".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000_Ways_to_Die">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000_Ways_to_Die</a></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Therefore, even giving reports exclusively written for the benefit of the Church of Scientology credibility, the ratio of people allegedly injured or killed by the Church of Scientology outnumbers the Splinter Groups/Freezone/Independents by over 300 to 1.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in injuring or Killing persons.</i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- As far as advocating the Suppression of Mankind, there is no evidence that any of the 500 groups listed on any list of Splinter or Divergent groups has ever advocated or encouraged such acts. On the other hand, the Church of Scientology has regularily promoted ideas described in the "ten stages of genocide" and frequently advocated that people be deprived or liberty or their Human rights should they happen to be blacklisted for whatever reason.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever advocated the Suppression of Mankind.</i></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">DO FREEZONE/INDEPENDENTS GROUPS TRULY HARM CASES?</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">4- While the results achieved by Splinter groups and Freezone factions tend to vary according to ideas and quality in their application, only a small handful of Independent practitioners (less than 5% - none of them being member of an organized group) has shown that they may be possibly labeled as "harmful". Even that claim is in dispute.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The matter of damaging people's cases is largely a subjective one.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">What of the auditor who falsely validates the hallucinatory claims of a pc to please him/her? Is he truly damaging the case of the person?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">What of the auditor who validates the pc who is convinced that he audits remotely and telepathically the world leaders, including President Obama?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Or how about the one who believes he/she gets daily instructions from the spiritual plane where LRH gives them daily advice on where to purchase anything from picnic foam plates to a large Plasma TV?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">What of people attesting to OT8, OT48 or even OT 1008?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Most of these people claim to be happy, though many of their peers tend to view them as delusional.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">For each person pointing them up as "damaged cases", there will be those who promote them as exemplary cases.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Merely making people happy with their state of case is a questionable criteria. A number of cases, by actual record, incompetently audited people can turn on some form of Psychosis and Deep Hatred after having been audited as a victim, when they were actually a chronic aggressor and abuser of the rights of others. If one was to audit an "Hitler type" personality, the latter may enjoy his newly gained abilities as a wonderful tool for more effectively committing genocide or spread his hatred against those he feel should be destroyed.</p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">PREVIOUSLY DAMAGED CASES</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Lastly, of supreme, but often neglected importance is whether the person's case was already damaged by the Church of Scientology or its predecessors in the field of Mental and Spiritual practices.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In the vast majority of cases, it is simply impossible to ascertain. The Church of Scientology, typically blames its failed cases on Psychiatry and often invents <b><i>newly discovered psychiatry related links </i></b>to rationalize even the most justified of attacks on them.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Every case that has openly testified against a Freezone or Independent auditor for being abused, misaudited or otherwise mishandled, had done the exact same thing toward the Church of Scientology a number of years earlier.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Policies on Sources of Troubles written by L. Ron Hubbard describes <b><i>responsible-for-condition cases </i></b>as those insisting things such as some auditor or thing being <b><i>"wholly responsible for the terrible condition I am in.” </i></b>the same policy states that a "<b><i>review of these cases show that they were in the same or worse condition long before auditing</i></b>... and that their antagonism extends to anyone who seeks to help them".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in Damaging Cases. Damaged cases are nearly always attributable to many causes and the evidence supports that the Church of Scientology does far more toward Damaging people's cases than any Splinter/Divergent group ever has.</i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">HOW TO DETERMINE IF A PRACTICE IS DAMAGING TO A CASE</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The correct method of determining if someone's case has been harmed by a practice is to confine oneself to the actions of the person (something that can be impartially examined) rather than the person feelings, beliefs or alleged character (something largely subjective)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The following questions should be examined and answered based on honest and thorough examination, while brushing away any and all bias and rumors:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- Is the individual, according to the world at large, as opposed to groups he/she is associated with (due to the likelihood of mutual out-rudiments) becoming a better person? By better person is meant someone who help others and who behave in accordance to a Moral Code such as the one written in the Way to Happiness. Because delusional or unethical individuals tend to PR themselves an actual thorough and independent examination of their activities is required.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- Is the person more successful along their dynamics? (especially the first three)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- What is the level of Communication of the person? Is it highly destructive toward selected individuals or are they focusing on constructive activities</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">4- Is the person a PR artist?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">5- Are the friends or associates of the individual people of Good-Will, (even if they may have made mistakes), or people actually involved in, actually PR artists and/or con men due to their destructive activities? Who are their friends? Who are their enemies?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">6- Are they hypocritically posing as "Free Independent" while covertly acting as Informant for the Church of Scientology (the one organization who has publicly vowed at trying to destroy all Independent Scientologist and practitioners). Are their enemies the same as the Church of Scientology?</p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">LAW OF EXCLUDED MIDDLE</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">"THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND"</span></b></p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Logic, in spite of the existence of the Data Series, is something largely unknown to Scientologists. The data Series written by L. Ron Hubbard were meant to complement the fundamentals of LOGIC. But most Scientologist (both within the Church and without) view it as a replacement, therefore they tend to act in a completely illogical manner.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Normal and ethical people often state that "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Many people who have been indoctrinated by some of the false ideas taught within the Church of Scientology tend to stick to those false ideas long after they have left or even publicly disavowed any beliefs in that organization or even its philosophy and original ideas.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It is a typically action by the same kind of people to willy-nilly provide assistance to the Church of Scientology when it seeks to malign its enemies, by providing all manner of Black PR and lies against their common enemies.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In most cases, the providing of Black PR against their perceived or imaginary enemies, in forums carefully chosen because OSA and Church agents are known to frequent them is meticulously calculated to harm its target by teh typical weapons of choice of the coward: Lies, Blackmail and defamation.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The result, uncomforted by those who have a low ability to confront Evil or Reality, is that the individuals publicly attacking the Church of Scientology Enemies by using defamation, Blackmail and lies, have become <b><i>de facto collaborators </i></b>of the Church of Scientology and are treated as <b><i>informants </i></b>and<b><i> reliable sources </i></b>by that organization.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The net result is to weaken the target of their hatred (often an individual with limited resources or time to defend himself) and strengthen the Church of Scientology (an organization documented to allocate unlimited resources toward the suppression of its enemies).</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The only possible conclusion is that the individuals claiming to be enemies of the Church, yet actively aid the Church in its attacks of its enemies are either incredibly stupid, hypocritical or an unholy mixture of both.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Many of the EX-Scientologist boards starting with their owners and moderators act that way. The same goes with a number of Freezone/Independent Boards, in particular those controlled by the self appointed Freezone PRs, who know very well their board is infested by OSA agents and operatives, though they profess otherwise.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The only reason a board like ESMB has been allowed to continue to exist, in spite of it numerous violations of the law, and the vast resources and connections of the Church of Scientology (and its ability to get it shut it down any day it chooses to), is that it is viewed by OSA as an invaluable tool to malign its enemies and the eagerness of those who portray themselves as Victims of Scientology to do its own dirty work. And they do it for free!</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Such Church allies can be created by incompetent or reckless Freezone/Independent auditors when they bypass the case of their pc and allow them to remain stuck in earlier bad and/or traumatic experiences at the hands of the Church of Scientology, yet attempt to audit them on Upper Levels or Rundowns. The resulting Blind fury or Hatred is typically targeted at anyone who may point out, especially correctly, the technical shortcomings of their auditor (the one largely responsible for restimulating the person).</p><br/><p align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE LIST OF ENEMIES AND SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS/GROUPS</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">SOED Flag ED 2830RB published on the 25 July 1992 is the last list of Suppressives published by the Church of Scientology. It proved to be such an embarrassment when it was leaked on the Internet, that the Church amended its policy of updating it and has since kept its ever-growing list of Declared Suppressive Persons, a secret.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">All one has to do is look at the historical records of the history and development of Scientology or the names of LRH former close associates and confidantes to recognize a veritable “Who is Who” of the History of Scientology in that issue alone.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Church of Scientology use blind zealots, fanatics and extremists such as those dedicating themselves at making Hatred web pages on imaginary enemies of the Church of Scientology, those stalking defectors to harass them and those who believe that spying on people of good-will to satisfy the pernicious agenda of OSA. The common denominator of all these people is a deep fear of the light of Truth and the exposing of their own crimes, lies and atrocities. That terror dominates their should so much that they become unable to recognize as an OUTPOINT (or illogic) the simple fact that anyone who sees 90% of one their former associates or comrades has all the attributes Paranoia. Paranoia is a condition largely created by having committed earlier a large number of harmful acts.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">To summarize:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Labelling Splinter or Divergent Groups as Suppressive is based on lies and used as an expedient to rationalize the blatant disregard by the Church of Scientology for people rights to practice their own religion as they see fit or express their opinion</i></b>.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">True Suppressive Groups obviously do exist: The Nazis, Organized Crime, Al-Qaeda are a few of them, but they are never listed by the Church of Scientology in the lists of Enemies of Mankind, while their own defectors always are.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Declaring Splinter or Divergent groups as Suppressives is an entirely political tool whose main aim is to stamp out competition. Further it attempts to maintain what is advertised as "the only road to Spiritual Freedom" and Spiritual redemption for Man as a Monopoly in the hands of a self-appointed Elite. That latter point is Ethically as reprehensible as can be, since its only possible result should it come to fruition is the Enslavement of Mankind.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Observation of the actual actions done by that Elite clearly indicates that the personal Aims of the Individuals that control that Elite have nothing to do with the purported Aims of Scientology nor its published Credo. On the contrary the aims of the Elite have mainly to do with the accumulation of wealth in the most expedient possible way (typically through the secret use of Slave labour, Sweat Shops and Intimidation) and in satisfying an insatiable thirst for Power over the souls that the Church of Scientology still controls.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The way to minimize the formation of Splinter Group is for the organization to remain open to the fruits of observation and to suggestions and to acknowledge people. Most Splinter Groups were created as a result of an unhandled upset or ARCX (Disagreement, Injustice, Invalidation). By keeping quality controls high and verifying that the proper standards and protocols are adhered to, results automatically follow and the demand for switching to wild unproven ideas will remain to a minimum. To utterly prevent the formation of Splinter or Divergent groups is simply impossible without adopting totalitarian measures and keeping a thought a police active.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">If one is to be in the business of helping people achieve higher levels of self-determinism, one need to accept that fact. The Church of Scientology has become akin to a 1984 type Orwellian nightmare because it refused to understand that simple principle.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><em>Pierre Ethier</em></p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-23726523189157157612013-03-12T17:13:00.001-07:002013-03-24T08:44:27.490-07:00Earth (Земя) Elitsa Todorova & Stoyan Yankoulov<p style="text-align:center;">[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_uuRPpfMvY&w=560&h=315]</p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-48018661591357780252013-03-12T16:47:00.001-07:002013-03-24T08:44:27.485-07:00Le Mystere des voix Bulgares<p style="text-align:left;">The voices of Bulgarian women are divine. Bulgarian folk music stands out with incredible vocal performances, in particular the layered, diaphonic harmonies along with an intricate multi-layering, and the timbre of the vibrato-free female Bulgarian voices. The Bulgarian folk performances preserve the unique traits of an ancient music, most notably the delivery from the diaphragm that restricted the vocal chords, enabling the production of the distinctive tones and drones beyond the traditional (read “western”) scale, as well as delivery techniques such as Melisma – the production of a single syllable of text in a range of notes or scale of quarter tones (to Western ears, a trance-like wailing reminiscent of Arabic chants or perhaps Flamenco), grace notes and trill, which punctuate the performances with a rarely experienced agility, grace and power.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;">[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3suy4Wj9SA]</p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-75108431519065999622013-03-12T16:34:00.000-07:002013-03-21T09:33:32.536-07:00ARC<img src="https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/317088_291819347497145_1451484217_n.jpg" width="960" height="651" class="alignnone" />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-55769986293740719802013-03-09T15:33:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:37:48.785-07:00The First Man in Space- In memory of Yuri Gagarin<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin</b> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_language" title="Russian language">Russian</a>: Ю́рий Алексе́евич Гага́рин; <small>IPA: </small><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Russian" title="Help:IPA for Russian">[ˈjʉrʲɪj ɐlʲɪˈksʲejɪvʲɪtɕ ɡɐˈɡarʲɪn]</a>; 9 March 1934 – 27 March 1968) was a<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Air_Force" title="Soviet Air Force">Soviet</a> pilot and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmonaut" title="Cosmonaut">cosmonaut</a>. He was the first human to journey into <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space" title="Outer space">outer space</a>, when his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok_(spacecraft)" title="Vostok (spacecraft)">Vostok</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft" title="Spacecraft">spacecraft</a> completed an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit" title="Orbit">orbit</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth" title="Earth">Earth</a> on 12 April 1961. Today he would of been 79 years old.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre-ethier-gagarin.jpg?w=300" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Pierre-Ethier-Gagarin" border="0" class="size-medium wp-image-3042 alignleft" height="237" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/pierre-ethier-gagarin.jpg?w=300" width="300" /></a>Aside from his short stature at 1.57 metres (5 ft 2 in), one of Gagarin's most notable traits was his smile.Many commented on how Gagarin's smile gained the attention of crowds on the frequent tours he did in the months after the Vostok 1 mission success.<sup id="cite_ref-34"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Gagarin#cite_note-34"><br /></a></sup></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Gagarin also garnered a reputation as an adept public figure. When he visited <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester" title="Manchester">Manchester</a> in the United Kingdom, it was pouring rain. However, Gagarin insisted that the car hood remain back so that the cheering crowds could catch a glimpse of him. Gagarin stated, "If all these people have turned out to welcome me and can stand in the rain, so can I." Gagarin refused an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella" title="Umbrella">umbrella</a> and remained standing in his open-top <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentley" title="Bentley">Bentley</a> so that the cheering crowds could still see him.<sup id="cite_ref-35"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Gagarin#cite_note-35"><br /></a></sup></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.inyourpocket.com/gallery/Yuri-Gagarin-Moscow--_7137.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" class="aligncenter" height="324" src="http://www.inyourpocket.com/gallery/Yuri-Gagarin-Moscow--_7137.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Korolev" title="Sergei Korolev">Sergei Korolev</a>, one of the masterminds behind the early years of the Soviet space program, later said that Gagarin possessed a smile "that lit up the Cold War".</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-33312821212604133452013-03-09T03:33:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:37:10.721-07:00ERRAND OF MERCY<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
<b><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></b></div>
<br />
<div align="center">
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">.</span></div>
<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have "outlived their usefulness".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Sometimes around the advent of its "Golden Age", the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.</div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://montanafesto.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/nursing-home-hands.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" class="alignleft" height="206" src="http://montanafesto.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/nursing-home-hands.jpg" style="text-align: -webkit-center;" width="302" /></a>Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30 years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and "having outlived her usefulness".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:"Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much..." I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference for the better.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as "useless" and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies) destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that "Enemy of the Church". It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of "an Extremist Organization". I was successful in helping that individual as well.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those "award winners" basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said. I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a "LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE" by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Pierre Ethier</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
(c) 2013</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-32824790059828026472013-03-08T10:28:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:33:32.496-07:00Good and Evil<p style="text-align:justify;"><i>Coming</i><em> soon "The Baobabs of Tomorrow"</em></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">GOOD AND EVIL</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">The Church of Scientology actions to suppress the Independent Field and Dissenters are actually making them stronger</span></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">L. Ron Hubbard repeatedly stated: Create God and you have to create the Devil.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">As usual the Church of Scientology gets its wrong and does anything that seems to make sense in reverse. Since that organization now dedicate itself almost exclusively into creating EVIL, through it callous and depraved acts, it logically follows that it is willy-nilly incenting the creation of GOOD through that ever increasing number of people of good will who oppose their pernicious agenda.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A quote frequently attributed to Edmund Burke (though there is no evidence he ever stated it) is: "<b><i>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing".</i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2933 alignleft" alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg?w=256" width="256" height="300" /></a>Along with the Code of Honour rules that "Your self-determinism and your honour are more important than your immediate life" and "Your integrity to yourself is more important than your body" this summarizes my personal philosophy in life and why threats that "I'd loose my Eternity" have always been entirely ineffectual on me. If you sell out your Integrity then, you have lost everything and there is no Eternity to be had. The big secret is that one cannot loose his Eternity except through his abandonment of his own Integrity. All threats to make one loose it are empty threats. Through the action of an Oppressor like the Church of Scientology actions against anyone who refuse to comply or who departs on his own determinism, one may suffer inconvenience, material discomfort. But when all is said and done, those who suffered through the fanatical actions of an organization or individuals bent on revenge and Evil will have moved up several notches on the Spiritual Scale and come that much closer toward true Enlightenment.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Those tormented souls acting on behalf of the Church (or on their own) to oppress people of Good Will pay very dearly by sliding toward an inexorable dwindling spiral of Spiritual degeneration, turmoil and unhappiness.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I happen to agree with L. Ron Hubbard, when he says, in complete agreement with the Laws of Karma that those who perpetuate Evil and refuse to self-examine to ensure they continue to act in accordance with Morality, Ethical Behaviour and Decency will get very much worse than just their deserved comeuppance.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">When someone has become freed from the fetters imposed by Life, material considerations, the body and the environment, and has moved on beyond what we call as "Life", one typically becomes faced with the most inexorable judge of all (oneself|)and sometime get a punishment so severe that few people can perhaps conceive of it.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Traditionally the concept of Hell was created to describe the most unpleasant possible of fates, but that concept was full misconceptions and sought to describe entirely Spiritual Phenomena with things that are only meaningful in the material universe.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">L.Ron Hubbard described the ultimate punishment could be was "to become an Animated Cluster: i.e. a single Being completely glued within a large group of degraded/ Insane beings intent on dramatizing the most perverse and destructive acts and continuously and violently at war with itself ". Or try to imagine becoming a Bacteria capable feeling pain and threats to survival while being incessantly attacked by antibodies.Or as a weak inmate in a room full of highly unfriendly and aggressive Hannibal Lecters.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Evil has a way to torment the righteous and the Ethical. One may even loose the battle, but as long as one has not sold out his Integrity he will remain undefeated.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">If Man is basically good, then anyone attacking people of Good Will or perpetrating Evil on them is admitting having already succumbed and admitted defeat face to those dark areas within his case he dares not face.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Evil is therefore the product of cowardice and the vast majority of people doing Evil acts are indeed cowards: they hide their identity while committing their crime. They use pseudonyms on the Internet, always very afraid of being exposed and confronting the fact that what they call their soul is nothing more than a little clinker.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Both the Evil intended individual and the Criminal share the following : Inability to conceive that another thinks differently or is motivated by different Aims than their own.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Life is full of Choices: it is very easy to engage in unethical behavior prompted by ignorance, bigotry or a desire for revenge or greed. The temporary rewards can seem to be great,but sooner or later it will be PAYBACK TIME. and the penalties will completely obliterate the amount of comfort or pleasure one had because of not thinking through the fact that there are always eventual consequences for one's acts.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">On the other hand, the one who said no to unethical behavior or invitations to Hate, may have to go through some rough patches, but the rewards will be far beyond the realm of material or physical gratification.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">They say that: "To err is Human. To forgive, divine".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I, for one, would rather emulate, the divine, even though it may require a greater effort, than do like too many and act the easy (and potentially evil way) "because it is Human".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">This is why I seldom respond to even the most outlandish acts of defamations made by a few bigots who somehow think that spouting lies about myself will end up helping them. They seem to be unable to grasp the fact that only the relatively few individuals with a like bigot frame of Mind agree with them.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The truth is that my many true friends will continue to have faith in me and what I say no matter what lie or drivel is spread about me. False friends and Enemies, will never have faith in me, no matter what I state or would prove.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">If enough people would say NO to abuse and Evil, it would greatly diminish its impact in the World. After all, those behind Evil tend to be lazy and cowards. They will therefore follow the path of lesser resistance and eventually when enough doors get closed in their face, seek to oppress those still willing to sell out their integrity.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Pierre Ethier</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">(c) 2013</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-38274140442779336332013-03-07T04:34:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:50:35.301-07:00PRISCILLA PRESLEY<br />
<br />
<b>PRISCILLA PRESLEY</b><br />
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-1.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Pierre audited Prescilla Presley" class="wp-image-3004 " height="179" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-1.jpg?w=219" width="131" /></a>American actress and businesswoman Priscilla Presley, the ex-wife of cultural icon <a href="http://www.biography.com/people/elvis-presley-9446466">Elvis Presley</a> and mother of singer-songwriter <a href="http://www.biography.com/people/lisa-marie-presley-9542148">Lisa Marie Presley</a>, was born on May 24, 1945. She starred in three <i>Naked Gu</i>n movies with <a href="http://www.biography.com/people/leslie-nielsen-9542322">Leslie Nielsen</a>, and played the character Jenna Wade on the television series <i>Dallas</i>. Presley founded Elvis Presley Enterprises and helped to turn Graceland into a multimillion-dollar tourist attraction.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Eight years after they met, Priscilla and Elvis were married in Las Vegas, Nevada. Their daughter, Lisa Marie, was born the following year, in 1968. Although their marriage didn't last (they divorced in 1973), Elvis and Priscilla remained friends, and raised Lisa Marie together, until his death in 1977.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
*<em>Pierre Ethier audited Priscilla Presley</em></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Film Credits</b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-2.jpg?w=232" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="PRISCILLA-PRESLEY-Pierre-Ethier-2" border="0" class="size-medium wp-image-3005 alignleft" height="300" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-2.jpg?w=232" width="232" /></a><em id="__mceDel"> <b></b><i>2011 2011 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys (in person)</i>, <i>2010 The ONE Show (in person)</i>, <i>2008 The Insider (in person)</i>, <i>2008 Jimmy Kimmel Live! (in person)</i>, <i>2008 Dancing with the Stars (in person)</i>, <i>2008 Access Hollywood (in person)</i>, <i>2007-2010 Larry King Live (in person)</i>, <i>2007 Elvis: Viva Las Vegas (in person)</i>, <i>2007 Dinner: Impossible (in person)</i>, <i>2006-2010 Entertainment Tonight (in person)</i>, <i>2006 This Morning (in person)</i>, <i>2006 The 50 Greatest Comedy Films (in person)</i>, <i>2006 Canada A.M. (in person)</i>, <i>2006 Breakfast (in person)</i>, <i>2005-2008 The Oprah Winfrey Show (in person)</i>, <i>2005 The Tony Danza Show (in person)</i>, <i>2005 Rove Live (in person)</i>, <i>2005 Late Show with David Letterman (in person)</i>, <i>2005 Friday Night with Jonathan Ross (in person)</i>, <i>2005 Elvis by the Presleys (in person)</i>, <i>2004 Between the Lines (in person)</i>, <i>2002-2005 Biography (in person)</i>, <i>2002 After They Were Famous (in person)</i>, <i>2002 After Dallas (in person)</i>, <i>2000 Hayley Wagner, Star (Performer)</i>, <i>1999 The Rosie O'Donnell Show (in person)</i>, <i>1999 Spin City (Performer)</i>, <i>1998 Finding Graceland (Producer)</i>, <i>1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Producer)</i>, <i>1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Performer)</i>, <i>1997 Touched by an Angel (Performer)</i>, <i>1997 Elvis: His Life and Times (in person)</i>, <i>1997 Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (Performer)</i>, <i>1996 Melrose Place (Performer)</i>, <i>1995 Wetten, dass.. (in person)</i>, <i>1994 Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult (Performer)</i>, <i>1994 Elvis: The Tribute (Producer)</i>, <i>1994 Elvis: The Tribute (in person)</i>, <i>1993 Tales from the Crypt (Performer)</i>, <i>1993 Rock the Vote (in person)</i>, <i>1992 The 9th Annual American Cinema Awards (in person)</i>, <i>1991 Wogan (in person)</i>, <i>1991 The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (Performer)</i>, <i>1990 The Adventures of Ford Fairlane (Performer)</i>, <i>1990 The 1990 Annual ShoWest Awards (in person)</i>, <i>1990 Live! With Kelly and Michael (in person)</i>, <i>1990 Elvis (Producer)</i>, <i>1989 The 3rd Annual American Comedy Awards (in person)</i>, <i>1988 The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (Performer)</i>, <i>1988 Elvis and Me (Producer)</i>, <i>1988 Elvis and Me (Writer)</i>, <i>1985 The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (in person)</i>, <i>1985 Night of 100 Stars II (in person)</i>, <i>1984 Elvis Presley's Graceland (in person)</i>, <i>1984 Elvis 85 (in person)</i>, <i>1983-1988 Dallas (Performer)</i>, <i>1983 The Fall Guy (Performer)</i>, <i>1983 Love Is Forever (Performer)</i>, <i>1981 The 7th Annual People's Choice Awards (in person)</i>, <i>1980 Those Amazing Animals (in person)</i>, <i>1980 The John Davidson Show (in person)</i>, <i>1978-2008 Good Morning America (in person)</i></em></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-3.jpg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><canter><img alt="PRISCILLA-PRESLEY-Pierre-Ethier-3" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3007" height="192" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/priscilla-presley-pierre-ethier-3.jpg?w=300" width="300" /></a></center></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-10200418476763226142013-03-03T17:31:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:42:38.560-07:00OTVIII and Beyond<div style="text-align: center;">
<em>LRH Legacy</em></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<strong> <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OT_VIII" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="OT VIII">OT VIII</a> and beyond what lies ahead of us???</strong><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
While all evidence points to the fact that no new <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Thetan" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="Operating Thetan">OT Level</a> will be released by the Church in our lifetimes, for those lucky enough to have "strayed" away from the yoke of that Institution, the bridge needs not dead-end at OT VIII.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Throughout the years, there have been many speculations as to what OT VIII and beyond were about. A number of uninformed <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="Individual">individual</a> even started to broadcast, quite erroneously that LRH had never even researched or written those. The same people are also content to tell that the world that the "last technical lecture from LRH dates from 1972", utterly oblivious of the fact that in late 1975, LRH gave a series of 22 lectures on the Flag Only "Special Rundown" (later to be called "New Vitality Rundown" or NVRD, to a group of over 40 Tech People.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1977, in broadly released issues LRH announced that at least 15 new Levels were fully researched and merely awaiting final write-up. Also the Class X, XI and XII materials make repeated and specific references to these Rundowns coming from "research on OT VIII-XV".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have also confirmed from private discussions with a number of individuals, some of which I have known for decades, and whom I consider to be honest and reliable that they even saw the materials themselves.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>NEW OT LEVELS VS OLD OT LEVELS</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is no such thing as OLD and NEW OT Levels, except within <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.rtc.org/" rel="homepage" target="_blank" title="Religious Technology Center">RTC</a>'s feverish mind (and therefore those of its followers). Except for "old OT I" (originally developed in 1966 and found in 1967 by LRH to be a dead-end), there has not been, since 1967 any "OLD OT Levels".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Its core issues written up in 1969, LRH found OT VIII to be "only for a High level <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thetan" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="Thetan">Thetan</a>", and the gradient simply too steep for most people, even a Full OT 7 completion. It took nearly a decade for tech to be developed to address those points.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a name='more'></a>Finally in 1978, LRH triumphantly announced that NOTS was the answer and the prerequisite for OT VIII. NOTS was found to be a far longer rundown than originally expected. Unfortunately over the next few years, RTC and the CSI (<a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.scientology.org/" rel="homepage" target="_blank" title="Church of Scientology International">Church of Scientology International</a>) re-wrote the bridge solely for "Marketing" and "Income Making Purposes" and not for "technical Reasons". NOTS, became "New OT V". The Solo NOTS Course (NOT an OT level, by any standard), became "New OT VI", and Solo NOTS (essentially the continuation of NOTS auditing, but done Solo, became "New OT VII". This was done, disregarding the obvious fact that by making "New Levels", the previous ones of the same name automatically became "OLD", in complete contrast to the Issues on technical Degrades. The issues on technical degrades are deemed so important by LRH, that he has ordered them to be at the beginning of every single course in <a class="zem_slink" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=35.5116666667,-104.58&spn=0.01,0.01&q=35.5116666667,-104.58 (Scientology)&t=h" rel="geolocation" target="_blank" title="Scientology">Scientology</a>. There is also no issue whatsoever or even order from LRH advising to market NOTS and Solo NOTS as "New OT V-VII" and to drop the previous line-up. This was a "bright idea" entirely dreamed up by the "New Management". To compound the felony, the entirety of the NOTS materials was purposely NEVER fully released by the Church to its own auditors or Public!<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The original issues of NOTS date from 1978-9. Additions were made in 1982, more in 1984. In 1991, several dozens pages of actual original LRH NOTS and LRH Solo NOTS materials was released as "New NOTS Rundowns". Faithful to its insatiable greed, the Church promptly found new names to market them such as "The Held-Down Seven Rundown", or the NOTS Stability Rundowns". Had the Church been more honest, they would have called them "The previously withheld NOTS rundowns". In the same vein in 1996 and 1998 "Newly found" (or rather withheld" materials) were announced, as a method of generating interest in an ever increasing bored public. Scores of "Newly found LRH Tech" still awaits Flag public and their eventually release is planned over the next several decades.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Why would someone do such a thing? More crass than the mere Evil Intent to Harm others because of some fancied threat, (the true genus of the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressive_Person" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="Suppressive Person">Suppressive</a>), Money and Greed are the actual motives. By releasing the entirety of NOTS and OT VIII, Flag is in great Danger of forever loosing its public, because they have no Intention of releasing OT IX anytime soon. The publicly admitted goal of the Church is that when every Organization (as of the 1990s) is the size of "Old St-Hill", OT IX will be released. Considering that the average Organization has substantially lower statistics than a decade ago and that some have even permanently closed their doors, that goal is in no danger of being attained in the foreseeable future. By keeping a trickle of LRH Tech coming in, the Church feels it can maintain its rein over all of its public. Better yet, by releasing "New Vital Tech" the Church can even justify recycling its OT VIII public through a second run of NOTS and then OT VIII (a cycle they may feel justified in repeating over and over if the number of its public continues at its current stagnant level). Add an infinite variation of Sec-Checks and False Purpose Rundowns done to address any fancied wrongs the individual may have ever committed this lifetime, and you now obtain a bottomless Technical Estimate, capable of bankrupting even the wealthiest of its public. As an added bonus, the latest tech Individual to have fallen out of favor will become the perfect scapegoat for having been "discovered to have withheld those materials", when new materials are to be released.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>THE TRUTH ABOUT OT VIII</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
OT VIII was originally written up in 1969. Around 1983, LRH wrote the final piece of that Rundown, a final step intended to polish up and stabilize the results.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Either deliberately, or perhaps, more accurately, as a direct result of the unawareness brought about by the burden of heavy overts, the individuals responsible for compiling OT VIII, for its 1989 release aboard the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freewinds" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" title="Freewinds">Freewinds</a>, entirely disregarded the original OT VIII materials and merely released the "final piece" as if it were the entire Rundown. The rest is History. In spite of the carefully controlled hype, the original release of OT VIII went like a lead balloon. Within just three months, well over 10% of its original public completions were dropping off like flies either dead or seriously ill, or victim of an accident or a crime. Many of the "younger public" were either tepid about the results or per actual session records, simply incapable of running the level with any substance or reality. The actual technical reason is actually not hard to imagine. Beside the fact that they were missing the majority of the rundown, younger public had never done the Original OT VII. The Original OT VII is a beautiful Level that has a lot to do with the ability to project one's Intention across. OT VIII was originally developed assuming everyone would have done OT VII prior to it.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT VIII</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
LRH says that OT VIII handles the subject of Amnesia on the Whole Track. By addressing the failure of the thetan to maintain his pan determined Viewpoint and remain unaffected by unpleasant experiences, one can handle the basic reason why a thetan start to go down the effect scale from total Awareness toward oblivion. A Rehabilitation of one's ability to view the Whole Track, and addressing the factors that predisposed one to have a Reactive Mind in the first place are the type of abilities one should expect at this level, aptly called "Truth revealed".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT IX</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
OT IX (Orders of Magnitude) was originally forgotten by both RTC and the Church of Spiritual technology in 1982 when legally registering them to their names and erroneously named Character (OT X). For someone familiar with that level, the Technical reason for it is extremely clear. OT IX (Orders of Magnitude) intensely deals with the Universe of Others. It requires no special knowledge to realize that a small elitist clique devout on perverting a valuable subject for its selfish gain and that an organization (The Church of Spiritual technology), whose board of Directors is exclusively composed by people practicing a profession that is dedicated at manipulating the truth to satisfy private interests (lawyers) are incapable of any true awareness of the Universe of Others.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At OT IX one should expect a whole new level of Interaction with others, especially at the OT ability level. Things like telepathy and "reading minds" are closely associated with this level. Contrarily to the lower end of the Bridge, on each of those Upper Levels, the individual is expected to produce "tangible" and measurable results, nor mere subjective gain. After all we are dealing with factual OT abilities here, not merely "feeling better".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Whereas, the lower end of the bridge is almost exclusively dealing with "negative Gain", i.e. getting rid of what is wrong with one self, the Upper OT Levels deal almost exclusively with "Positive Gain", i.e. Gaining Abilities and rehabilitating a being. Dianetics, OT III, NOTS are example of Negative Gains. The Original OT IV-VII, OT IX and beyond are examples of Positive Gain</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT X</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
OT X, Character, addresses the subject of Postulates. On this Level one confronts why some, in spite of an apparent High level of OT still revel in Evil and why others remain good. OT X is meant to rehabilitate one's fundamental purpose and blow all the reasons one would ever become PTS in the first place. The result is a very fortified thetan with an enormously increased ability to make his own postulates stick. This level explains the reason why "old curses" sometimes work, and provide the ability to blow them.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT XI</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Operating is a true OT Level. This is a Level the Church, who is now effectively under the Control of the US Government, is and should be terrified of. This level deals with Remote Viewing. Remote Viewing is the worst possible commodity for the corrupt individual or Organization. It is not that a decadent Organization is so much terrified at the idea of its secrets being known, but rather its elitist clique goes into a complete frenzy at the thought that its dirty backroom deals, its bribes and its secretly committing the very same acts they routinely expose in others, could become common knowledge.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT XII</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At this Level, one starts to have a new understanding and viewpoint of the Physical Universe and its components: Matter, Energy, Space and Time. New notions about time are part of this level. One of the things discovered on this level is that the flow of Time is not a constant and that time actually is flowing faster today than on the early track. This level revolutionizes most people's understanding about Physics. A whole new concept about the Future opens up.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT XIII</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Church does not name this Level. Its name is "Knowledge"</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT XIV</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Church does not name this Level. Its name is "Ability"</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>OT XV</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Church does not name this Level. Its name is "Freedom"</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>SUMMARY</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
From all evidences, neither the Church, nor the Government is interested in making people truly OT.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A true OT cannot be fully controlled against his will. He will not become the adverse effect of an individual or a group.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A true OT automatically supports what is good and tries to prevent what is Evil.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A true OT perceives the ulterior motives and hidden agendas of others.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Read the "OT Wins" from Advance magazines from the 1970s and compare them to "OT Wins" in recent Church Publications such as Freewinds or "Source".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The former talks about remotely causing effects, bona-fide miracles, exterior phenomena and actually exercising one's OT skills.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The later merely talks about "Feeling great", "Handling one's difficulties" and "Getting rid of undesirable traits".</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In other words, the Church's OT Wins have now degraded themselves to the level of those achievable on Lower grades.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you don't believe it, pick up a recent copy of the Freewinds magazine and compare it to an early Advance Mag.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Pierre Ethier</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Class XII</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<strong><span style="color: red;">Related links: <a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/ot-levels/"><span style="color: red;">About OT Levels </span></a></span></strong></div>
<br />
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/3dlandscape16.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-596" height="293" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/3dlandscape16.jpg" style="border: 2px solid black;" title="3dlandscape16" width="820" /></a><br />
<br />
<strong>Starting OT IX</strong><br />
<br />
Starting OT IX has been awesome. Already I find myself more in control of my environment and find that it is not nearly as threatening as I had supposed. I have come to realize that there were things about peoples character or their universe that I could be responsible for and change or not change as I decided. By looking for what I disagreed with and then discovering that I could accept it, I found that my understanding of others increased considerably and, consequently, my ARC for them.<br />
<br />
Just a few days ago a dear friend of mine called to say that she had pneumonia. She wanted to know if I could help. I took a look at her body and found a problem in each lung. These problems seemed to be at odds with each other. The turbulence created was causing her illness. By thoroughly viewing the cause of the problem, it vanished. The next day she reported that she was out of bed and feeling so much better. A couple days later she was over the sickness.<br />
<br />
I consider myself fortunate to have Pierre as my auditor and C/S. The auditing is without doubt far superior than any other I've received. The supervision has allowed my own auditing to flow without stops and always on track.<br />
<br />
Signed: <em>JB</em><br />
<br />
(Published with JB’s written permission)<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/3dlandscape20.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-520 aligncenter" height="624" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/3dlandscape20.jpg" title="win" width="713" /></a></div>
<br />
<strong>Success on OT IX</strong><br />
<br />
On OT IX, I greatly increased my awareness of myself and my perception of the universe of others, including people, animals, plants, and disembodied thetans. I find that I can easily perceive simultaneously a room full of people, each as individuals, as well as their collective mind. The universes of minds are an order of magnitude beyond what my attention was focused on before doing this level.<br />
<br />
(published with H.J.'s written permission)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/disneyland.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-514 aligncenter" height="444" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/disneyland.jpg" title="universe" width="593" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
LRH Death Event : Pat Broeker</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
"There is ONLY ONE source!" is often forgotten by the Church Of Scientology and the Independent Practitioners</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HoCiQtVFLc&w=420&h=315]</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
The official LRH Death Announcement event took place at the Flag Land Base in February 1986. The event was hosted by David Miscavige, Pat and Annie Broeker and the Church Attorney Earl Cooley.</div>
<br />
Pat Broeker said he and his wife Annie Broeker were with LRH the last days up until his death. Pat said he was assisting LRH with his research into the upper OT levels. Pat Broeker also said that LRH left completed OT levels up to OT XV and beyond. Pat was a Loyal Officer in LRH’s absence.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/fo3879.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-609" height="815" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/fo3879.jpg" title="Fo3879" width="593" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
-------</div>
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: black; text-decoration: underline;">Note: <a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/ot-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permalink to OT Levels"><span style="color: black; text-decoration: underline;">OT Levels</span></a></span></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<!-- .entry-header --><em>Some information about the OT levels on Marty Rathbun’s is based on assumptions that are not supported by facts. As usual, fabrications , misinformations and rumors tend to spread like wildfire. Marty accurately established that there was no trace of the upper OT LEVELS where L. Ron Hubbard lived (and died). His further conclusions however were based on assumptions that do not naturally flow out of his established facts. He went on to deduct that LRH WAS A CONTINUOUS LIAR and never made them. FACT: L. RON HUBBARD developed the <strong>OT LEVELS</strong> above OT VIII in the 1970s on the Apollo …NOT IN THE 1980s. It is a fact that the <strong>Class XII</strong>s saw them, there were other witnesses. The <strong>Ls</strong> are based on <strong>OT VIII-XV</strong>. There is even a <strong>PUBLISHED OT VIII</strong> bulletin from 1969 and a dozen places where <strong>LRH</strong> gives data coming from OT VIII. This is another aberrated by-product of Scientology culture:”If it wasn’t seen by oneself it doesn’t exist”. This is Ostrich thinking and Galileo (re: “The Earth”), Einstein ( re:”Theory of relativity” ) had proven this approach to the nature of things to be wrong! . Those who are so quick at jumping at conclusions and whose perceptions are so low they can’t see illogic where it exist, are nowhere near ready for the upper <strong>OT LEVELS</strong> anyway, so why are they apparently so deeply concerned? <a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/rons-journal-68-lrh-disconnection-is-canceled/" target="_blank" title="RJ 68">(Related reference)</a></em></div>
<br />
Below are few references by L. Ron Hubbard's in regard to the upper OT levels.<br />
<br />
HCOB 30 Jul 73 “Scientology, Current State of the Subject and Materials”<br />
<br />
<i>"There are perhaps 15 levels above OT VII fully developed but existing only in unissued note form, pending more people's full attainment of OT VI & VII.”</i> L. Ron Hubbard<br />
<br />
HCOB 24 Jan 77 “Tech Correction Round-Up”<br />
<br />
<i> “OT VIII has been in existence all those several years, and to it has been added a very large number of OT grades. None of them have been issued. Notes for all these grades are in existence.”</i> L. Ron Hubbard<br />
<br />
L. Ron Hubbard ED 301 Int’, 17 Dec 78 “Ron's Journal 30, 1978—The Year of Lightning Fast New Tech”<br />
<br />
<i>“UPPER LEVELS. There are other OT levels above VIII but these will be released from time to time when people are ready for them. We're already higher than Man has ever been and it can get quite stratospheric.”</i> L. Ron Hubbard<br />
<br />
FES Checklist (FES: Folder Error Summary), used by Case Supervisors use to program cases. This checklist is Attachment 1 to HCOB 29 January 1981RA, Auditor Admin Series 24RB "FES Checklists and Summary".<br />
<br />
Hubbard, L. (1981, 29 January) FES Checklists and Summary, Attachment 1. Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Vol. S1, pp. 511-31). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.<br />
<br />
<i>OT LEVELS</i><br />
<br />
<i>NEW OT VIII (Truth Revealed)_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT IX (Orders of Magnitude)_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT X (Character)_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT XI (Operating)_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT XII (Future)_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT XIII_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i>NEW OT XIV_________________</i><br />
<br />
<i> NEW OT XV_________________</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://alanzosblog.blogspot.ca/2012/07/marty-rathbuns-blind-spots-on-l-ron.html" target="_blank">Sources</a><br />
<br />
M. Rathbun interview:<br />
<br />
"Well, Pat was an interesting fish because Miscavige, ah, all he was concerned about was getting materials that Hubbard had written about the upper levels, Hubbard's PC folders, notes that he had done that Broeker alluded to that were essential to compiling certain Scientology levels that hadn't been released, and this sort of thing. Broeker had been, been hiding these, using them as a last defense to prevent Miscavige from wiping him out from having any authority or influence in the Church. This was all part of his power push against Broeker. And once, we had, we had this huge confrontation where I had brought in a number of PIs, security guys, you know, hired guns, literally, to come in so Miscavige could have a direct confrontation with Broeker. It was me, Wilhere, Starkey, all of his henchmen. All of Miscavige's henchmen came in and had his con- and Miscavige had his confrontation with Broeker.<br />
<br />
And finally got Annie. Annie finally broke under the pressure and told Dave where Pat was storing the materials, at a storage space.<br />
<br />
Well once that, once the materials were gotten, Broeker had no more cards to play. And he basically said, "Screw it, I'm out of here. I'm leaving."<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/components/video/?bctid=47187265001" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
David Mayo says 3:15 –<strong> "LRH continue researching the levels above that and eventually completed through what’s called OT XI"</strong><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<em>David Mayo was the senior spiritual technical person who L. Ron Hubbard initially entrusted to oversee the whole Scientology spiritual practice legacy in 1982, when the aging Hubbard realized he didn't have many years left. Mayo's title was the Senior Case Supervisor International. Mayo fell from grace just months after the April 1982 20 page despatch from Hubbard where Hubbard detailed to Mayo what Hubbard wanted. This talk discusses that 20 page despatch and other relavant events. This talk is one of several dozen talks recorded of David Mayo speaking in 1983 or 1984 at the center in Santa Barbara where David's group of ex official Scientologists were based. Mayo's Scientology splinter group probably formed the largest and most skilled schism group of ex official Scientologists in the history of the Scientology movement, and from these tapes of Mayo's group's informal weekly graduation ceremonies, it can be heard that his schism group's offered services were almost the same services official Scientology delivers, with just different names. Mayo's group operated within a milder atmosphere, minus the harsher atmosphere of official Scientology. Mayo's Santa Barbara group was hit with suits and infiltration by official Scientologists and the Mayo group fell apart within a few years. But while it was operating, Mayo's group constituded the largest schism group in the Scientology movement's 60 or so years of history so far.</em><br /><em>- Chuck Beatty, ex Scientology (Sea Org) staffer 1975-2003</em>"</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/two-detectives-describe-their-two-decade-pursuit-of-an-exiled-scientology/1254129">Tampa Bay Thimes about Pat Broeker</a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="http://johanw.home.xs4all.nl/CoS/levels.html" target="_blank">1994 Church of Scientology price list for services</a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e235/Swift77/2Ls001.jpg" target="_blank" title="Ls prices at the Church of Scientology">2002 Church of Scientology price list for the Ls</a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
----------</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
This website has been designed to provide general educational information about the personal legacy and spiritual opinions of the respective authors and does not represent or imply the representation of products, services and financial information. The third party links have been obtained through internet search.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
----------</div>
<br />
Below is a partial list of OT VIII's Completions based on records in Freewinds Magazine Issue # 1 to Issue # 89 (Dec 1989 to April 2012). The Church of Scientology offers only an <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">abbreviated</span></strong> version of OT VIII.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ak24Z0-35q2IdFhzcjVucE9LSVM3ZkJnVW5PcHhSWlE">The Excel view of the list is more user friendly</a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-85532433133952207292013-02-28T19:52:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:54:41.700-07:00SCIENTOLOGY: A PASSION FOR GENOCIDE<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg"><img alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2933" height="683" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg" width="585" /></a></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: justify;">
The Church of Scientology promotes Hatred, Discrimination and vilification of anyone who has the guts to expose it to the light of Truth.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All I have done so far is to communicate publicly for them to knock off their Evil ways and to cooperate in ethical and honest ways to promote the spiritual Freedom of individuals. All my communications addressed to the Church and its agents and puppets so far, have fallen on deaf ears.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is costing them their shirt: Church membership has dwindled by 60% in the past 10 years alone. Their Magazines (Auditor, Advance,Source, Freewinds) betray the true numbers. One has merely to compare the statistics of completions and the names to discover some disturbing facts:</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1- The Number of Completions to Major Levels and Rundowns is on a continuous decline, which contradict the generalities and soaring graphs with no scale nor reference points published at events. The events themselves are largely boycotted by its public, which has prompted Senior Management to hire busloads of Extras (non scientologists generic actors) to give the illusion of attendance. Virtually every photo of a crowd at events is photoshopped to multiply its size. It has become so gross that in some cases even a casual observer can discover it on his own.</div>
<br />
<br />
<img alt="" height="287" src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/536270_10151492491833275_281095806_n.jpg" width="768" /> <em>Doctored promo: Headless man appears 3 times, once with no head, ghostly woman also 3 times and once without a head, the people top right corner and far right are actually proportionately smaller, like hobbits, and the female with the red top is there twice</em><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2- The organizations are almost entirely deserted. Except for a few large organizations, most Class IV Org around the world have less than a dozen staff. Some of the same organizations had upward of 100 staff in the late 1970s.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3- When David Miscavige high-jacked Scientology resources to defend himself in a copy of Freedom Magazine 2 years ago, the following points could be observed. For each mention of L. Ron Hubbard, David Miscavige name was mentioned three times. Nowhere was there a mention of the TRUE statistics of Scientology; CLEARS AND OTs (because these statistics are dreadfully low and on a steady decline).The only statistics mentioned were the number of square feet and value of Real Estate Property under the Church control. It clearly shows that the Church is primarily interested in the acquisition of wealth.Nowhere does Spiritual Freedom come in the equation any more.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It has been well documented that acquisition of Real Estate property is meant to be distraction for the few remaining faithfuls, to hide the horrible truth that the Church of Scientology is on a toboggan ride toward the bottom.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4- The number of defectors from the Church of Scientology now surpasses its membership Over 30,000 people have been declared suppressives since RTC came into being in 1982. This is twice as many active Scientologists in good standing within the Church worldwide.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/317723_10151492519523275_1397663936_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="365" src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/317723_10151492519523275_1397663936_n.jpg" width="402" /></a></div>
<em>Doctored promo: The woman at the bottom left of the blue circle is standing next to an 8 foot tall black man is there twice</em><br />
<em></em><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In Scientology every statistic of its Management is now false to protect against the Church worst fear: the discovery of truth by its members: that its leadership is corrupted to the core (David Miscavige denying food and rest to his juniors, but extorting the Sea Org underpaid staff to buy him a $100,000 motorcycle and finance a life of luxury while some Sea Org staff live in conditions more appalling than those found in the poorest countries on Earth). This is why the Church has abandoned LRH ideas of making each org "saint Hill size" and has "ideal orgs" instead. Saint Hill size is based in numbers. Ideal org is based on opinion and fudginga few meaningless stats. All one has to do is look at the pictures of those ideal orgs in action: they are quiet like morgues and the course rooms are empty.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Stress and invalidation of preclears and Pre-OTs has grown exponentially over the years. Life expectancy for an Upper Level Scientologist on Church lines is now below 57 years.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Ls are about to become an extinct technology at Flag.Last year the FSO lost two Class XII C/S to cancer (A Kartuzinsky and Richard Reiss). There are only 9 Class XII remaining at Flag and most of them are already Senior Citizens . The Ls are now being mistaught and run differently than the way L Ron Hubaard taught it to the original Class XIIs. They are now run "Miscavige style" and their failure ratio is now 50%. (prior to my departing in 1992, any Class XII with less than 95% success ratio was removed from auditing and sent on a retrain)</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Church actually amuse me whenever they promote the most aberrant fabrications about me or others that they are unable to blackmail because the only one dirty with crimes is the Church itself.The Church typically recruits renegades with a long history of betrayal and people who are according to their own records insane and unfit for services. I have studied enough pc folders of those GO or OSA puppets cases in the past to know it. The Church hires in lieu of journalists, people so aberrated and crazy that the only uniform they should wear is a straight-jacket.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I recognize the recent frenzy of attacks by OSA and the Church for what it is: the death throws of a wild Beast that has been mortally wounded by the black PR that has backfired upon themselves from decades of lies, deceptions and unethical acts and a list of defectors twice as long as its current membership.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One would think that those running the Church would grown a brain or have a sudden attack of sanity and try to reform the Church, but everything including quality of Services seems to be getting worse every year.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One of the lies promoted by the Church is that I keep desperately searching for PCs to audit. Thanks to the great stupidity and incompetence of OSA and the zombies that now abound on Church staff, I am literally besieged by inquiries from traumatized and disgruntled public of the Church. I just cannot find the time to look for new public. I even had to hire a secretary just to address the load.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Their pc complaints are multiple: Gross Auditor code violations: evaluation, Invalidation, squirrel procedures not written in any HCOB but ordered by the failed auditor who now runs the Church (David Micavige was expelled from his Class IV internship at Saint Hill in the 1970s for gross Auditor code violations and reports of physically assaulting the pc in the session). Registrars and executives pillaging the accounts of public to get book sales and earn a 15% commission. Denigration of the state of Clear,etc.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The numbers are multiplying Thanks to the Publcity from the Church of Scientology itself. Who believes them? The Ku Klux Klan, the Neo Nazis and the Taliban have now more credibility that the Church of Scientology has remaining.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I certainly would not go out of my way to defend myself against the raving and insane fabrications of lunatics and mass murderers such as Charles Manson,Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden.In fact I would view personal attacks and parroting of the insane fabrication by these or their stooges,dupes or fans as a form of compliment, meaning that I must be doing something right to get such a degree of attention.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/wiki/Oliver_Wendell_Holmes,_Sr.">Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.</a> described bigotry in the following quotation: "The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract."</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My Life philosophy can be resumed in the following sentence:</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>All</i></b><b> that is necessary for the triumph of <i>evil</i> is that <i>good men do nothing</i>.</b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyone who thinks that the Church of Scientology has not become an EVIL organization has either become mentally lobotomized or seeks to purposefully promote Evil because of the advantages he or she thinks it will afford him/her.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have departed the Church of Scientology because by 1992,under its leadership it violated the core principles taught in the fundamentals of its philosophy of helping people and seeking to live with the truth.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I developed disagreement in the view that L. Ron Hubbard had reached a permanent state of Infallibility and could never err. (something by definition reserved only for Deity).</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I developed disagreement in the fanatical application of the Scientology procedures,observing that I had a near 100% success rate and those under tight control of the Church had a success below 70% by the time I left and that this ratio has continue to go down since.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I decided that it was wrong for the Church to hide its corrupt activities and to keep on telling tell gross lies to its membership for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of Money controlled by its elite.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Therefore attempt to silence me (Church, Freezone,Independents) simply means that:</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1- Those attacking me are deeply afraid. Criticism is defined by L. Ron Hubbard as the desire to Harm with a covert admission that one is incapable of actually doing so. Therefore after too many failures to harm someone of goodwill, the mind becomes psychotic and starts to dream the most frantic and absurd fabrications and soon starts to hallucinate believing in their own lies.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2- Those who propagate Hatred believe they have the right to violate the Human Rights of others if it threaten in their eyes the triumph of their ideology. (This is in itself the definition of Extremism)</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyone who departs from the Church by dissenting or embracing different beliefs and religious views than those taught by its current leadership is uniformly treated in the following manner</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1. <b>Classification: </b> People are divided into "us and them". The Church (or fanatical opponent group like Freezone factions) views itself as the good guys no matter how Evilly they act and feel that attacks anyone who try to show them howto reform Evil.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2. <b>Symbolization</b> "When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups..."</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3.<b>Dehumanization</b> "One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases." (squirrels) or ridiculing any handicap, old age etc.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4.<b>Organization</b> Attacks are always organized. Special groups or Specialists execute the pernicious agenda seeking to destroy the targeted individuals/group</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
5. <b>Polarization</b> "Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda..."</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
6. <b>Preparation</b> "Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity..." My disagreements with the Church are philosophical and religious in nature.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
7.<b>Extermination</b> "It is 'extermination' because the perpetrators feel the target is a liability to the greater group or Dynamic and is viewed with deep Hatred. Ostracism, boycott and Isolation are merely the first stages before violence becomes justified in the eyes of the perpetrators because their victims are not truly human."</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
8. <b>Denial</b>:The perpetrators... deny that they committed any crimes..." OSA (and its agents) and the Freezone are frequently accomplished liars.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
9. <b>Discrimination: </b>Because of its dissenting views and the enactment of the previous steps, both the Church and its offshoots (Freezone/Independents) promote the FAIR GAME LAW and the spreading of calumnies and vilification toward dissenters.<b></b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
10.<b>Persecution:</b>systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs or affiliations or lack thereof.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Above 10 steps are known as the 10 Stages of Genocide.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It describes very precisely the tactics of the Church toward religious dissension.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyone who still promotes the ideals of the Church of Scientology in maligning its religious dissenters and/or who promotes Hatred toward those it dislikes or have physical disabilities,or belong to the "wrong ethnic group" should be labelled for what he or she is: <b> A GENOCIDE ADVOCATE</b>.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Pierre Ethier</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
(c) 2013</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-91513766781049766282013-02-28T19:09:00.001-08:002013-03-24T09:04:13.614-07:00``The Bulgarian Umbrella`` for my juvenile stalker (Humor)<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier.jpg"><img alt="Catherine Ethier" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2938" height="477" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier.jpg" width="505" /></a></div>
<br />
Thank you for the recognition ! I am fully flattered . WoW. My juvenile stalker labeled me as`The Brains``and here how a tale got born. My stalker is " Pinky" . At least I got a brain. This reminds me the song from <a href="http://youtu.be/iJPFSNu_QNs" target="_blank">The Pinky and The Brain</a> about the two mice who every night are trying to take over the world : `.... One is a genius and the other is insane`... Now we have the new version of the tune about the genius and the insane. Two Catherine's are" trying" to take over ..........hmmm The Internet..........or The FreeZone ?<br />
<br />
Madonna is not the only one having a stalker. I have one as well !<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier-and-the-brain.jpg"><img alt="Catherine-Ethier-and-The-Brain" class="size-full wp-image-2939" height="322" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catherine-ethier-and-the-brain.jpg" width="593" /></a> </div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Our version of The Brains</div>
<br />
<em>Blow are few emails recently received:</em><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I want to thank you for all the info on your blog. It really has gotten me closer to confronting my own dynamics and wanting to go OT. I am going to continue reading your blog and frankly feel safe doing so knowing you have done so much and have a lot of experience with the tech. I have a ton of questions. I would be honored if you would be a terminal for me in my quest for the truth. I have been a Scientologist since the late 60s.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My Best,</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<em>Signed</em></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
——</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have followed your blog over the past year, having been affiliated with the church. It has been helpful and enlightening in many ways. I am a successful executive in Europe. I also work in the US and South America from time to time. I advanced in my auditing, and couple of years ago I desisted in my auditing as I had clear differences with the church. I underwent endless ethics sessions trying to fix the matter, saw many things in session, and yet, the situation did not change, reason for which I decided to go on with my life as the Way to Happiness preaches, rather than being forced to be something that I feel I should not. However, this radical disconnection from source is difficult as my spiritual goals remain stagnant for the time being. I am hesitating whether or not to go back to auditing in the church. <strong><em>I thank you for your efforts to heighten the values of this spiritual path.</em></strong> It has been soothing and helpful in understanding many points of confusion.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Thank you,</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Signed</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
——–</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>[Introduction]</i>…..I became aware of Scientology in the 90-es and had life-changing win right away. Since then it has been over two decades of unsuccessful trying to achieve any progress or win despite my efforts, involvement and resources spent. In the last couple of years, as I could see within Scientology organizations I visited for help increasing outpoints which were in direct conflict with my purposes to achieve positive changes to my life. I felt indoctrinated and started to look for alternatives and data to explain what I saw in the Church. That is how I found your videos and your blog and that is how I decided to contact you. I don’t want to waste your time by writing long stories about my experience nor I would expect any technical opinions based on e-mail communication. To be perfectly honest, I don’t know really, what to do, it seems, after all I did and tried, I would need some expert handling that I believe I can get in the Church. Would it be possible to get some help and guidance from you?</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Yours Sincerely</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<em>Signed</em></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
——–</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A few years back, I hit a point where I was in need of some answers and became willing to communicate with anyone or anything to come up with some answers. I’ve found plenty of answer. I never knew how deep the rabbit hole went.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I’ve enjoyed your Web site, I enjoy your blog.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Best,<br />
<em>Signed</em><br />
CL VIII</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
——–</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
….Thank you for the link to Pierre`s blog !!! I see weeks worth of reading and enlightenment and catching up .. After all these years. …..I am very encouraged after decades of hopelessness. And I look forward to seeing Pierre again. It is so comforting to know that there is hope again for spiritual progress … and by such a friend and high caliber auditor as you Pierre!!!</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<em>Signed</em></div>
<br />
<br />
<div id="jp-post-flair" style="text-align: justify;">
<strong>Below a copy of our logs :</strong></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/church-of-scientology.jpg"><img alt="Church-Of-Scientology" class="size-medium wp-image-3123 aligncenter" height="211" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/church-of-scientology.jpg?w=300" width="300" /></a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-25684476271314468452013-02-28T13:36:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:33:32.446-07:00AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES<p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2933" alt="Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre_ethier-scientology-class-xii.jpg" width="585" height="683" /></a></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b>2 </b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">TECHNICAL VOLUMES 13 AND 14</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A number years ago, an enterprising individual took it upon himself to compile the entirety of the Upper Level materials (mainly confidential ones) that were available to him.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Those two volumes were prepared in PDF format and made to look just like the original Technical Volumes issued in 1976</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Immediately, the bulk of the Independent field took the compilation as complete, entirely authentic and accurate, three things it simply was not. It seems that acknowledging the fact that some materials were incomplete would have run afoul of a number or practitioners vested interests, especially financial ones. As a result, a number of auditors have been running boot-leg rundowns or rundowns that are attributed to LRH but are in fact the entire creation of Independent auditors of questionable competence.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I have denounced the inaccuracies within those two volumes, to little avail in the past.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Here is an exact summary based on facts by someone who has had access to the entirety of the materials covered in those volumes:</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">VOLUME 13</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">POWER</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Whereas all materials but one issue is complete and authentic, the materials are not complete. The way the materials are presented has led a number of auditors to assume very incorrectly that any Class IV, including those who have not even interned would be competent enough to audit those processes. This is definitely not the case. It requires the highest skill to run those processes competently. Particularly notable in their omission, are the materials that explain the actual auditing style and why running Power processing on Clears is destructive to their case and why it is suppressive to do so.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">R6EW</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The checksheet is missing, but 80% of required materials are present, all of them bona fide. Missing are 5 C/S only or confidential HCOBs that are crucial for proper guidance on the level.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">CLEARING COURSE</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The entirety of the Clearing Course written materials is presented minus the checksheet.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Missing are all of the Clearing Course Films. Also three HCOBs that are only found on the SOLO C/S course (and the AO Review Auditor course) that deal with the state of Clear and are crucial in determining the mechanics of Clearing and on what type of auditing it is possible (or impossible) to achieve Clearing. Failure to apply those principles has led to numerous false attests to the state of Clear from pcs on lower levels in the In dependent field, where the Auditor-C/S was simply not qualified to make the adjudication. The self-appointed Freezone PR has been fanatically active falsely validating those attestations, and chastised me for "speaking against Upstats" even after I showed him evidence that those "Upstats" were in fact very much Downstats and in lower conditions as far as the Tech is concerned. I hope that those who read my comment decide to enlist competent help before blindly attesting people to Clear with no independent test and without someone who is fully trained to validate Clear. A particular organization that specializes in false Clear attest at lower levels decided to direct people on OT II to run the Clearing Course Materials at the same time, "because the pc is very much interested in running those" If those who perpetuate that out-tech had only bothered to train properly they would have realized that the reason for such interest was that the fact that these individuals had never archived the state of Clear in the first place!</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Some ignorant individuals have renamed their own copies of the 1958 Clearing Congress Films held in Washington DC as "Clearing Course Films"</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">For the record: there are 6 Clearing Course films (5 technical briefings, one demo session)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Bank and its pattern (1964)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Materials of the R6 Bank (1965)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Composition of the Bank (1966)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Technical Materials (1966)<br/>General Information (1966)<br/>Auditing Demonstration (1966)</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">VOLUME 14</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">OT I</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Complete and authentic materials of all past and present version of OT I<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">OT II</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Complete and authentic materials. One page from the platens is omitted, most likely the result of an error. The text version of Volume 14 has the missing page.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">OT III</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Complete and authentic materials as far as the student OT III course pack goes.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">5 OT III C/S and Remedy/Review HCOBs are missing. These HCOBs are crucial for programming certain types of remedy. Only auditors who have audited OT III reviews at an AO or Flag or trained on the Solo C/S course are likely to have ever read those bulletins.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">ORIGINAL OT IV-VII</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Each of those levels is in some way altered from the version written by LRH.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The original materials of these levels were entirely written in LRH hand. The materials presented in Volume 14 are typed materials.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">OT IV has some crucial Processes/Drills omitted from it. The C/S instruction on C/Sing the level are entirely missing. The first step of OT IV is an audited rundown audited by a Class VIII. Misguided Freezone C/Ses with the Quickie impulse are known to instruct people to do that step Solo, even though it is clearly a Review Action and has a secret purpose not revealed to the pc but known by the C/S.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">OT VII is entirely different than the version written by LRH. It turns out to be the "EDUCTIVISM" version. Eductivism was Jack Horner (pronounced squirrel by LRH and persecuted for it) own take and version of Scientology in the 1960s and 1970s. Jack Horner believed in the vital importance of running Creative Processing. LRH ordered Creative Processing abandoned during the 1950s, after observing that it tended to beef up the bank in a number of cases.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Anyone reading that version of OT VII will instantly notice that it contains many Creative processing processes and therefore an immediate giveaway that it cannot be authentic.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The true version of OT VII start with an assessment before any process is run.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">And last but not least, the End Phenomenon of OT VII is not mentioned, making one wonders if all those who trumpet completing people on OT VII are truly giving their pcs what they had been promised ,if neither they nor the pc truly know the EP.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">NEW OT V: NOTS</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Mainly Complete. Authentic materials. A few of the NOTs series are missing.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">There are a total of 55 NOTs series Bulletins plus a number of additions and attachments.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">NOTE: NOTs 53 is missing. It was a useful bulletin called ERRORS ON NOTs, which gave useful and realistic examples on how NOTs cases could be debugged. Because it was written by David Mayo, in 1982 all copies were ordered to be pulled out of packs and anywhere else and turned over to RTC. Everyone having access to that bulletin was sec-checked to ensure no copy had survived.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">NOTS 56 is a forgery. I am told that a "FREEZONE AUTHORITY" had certified it as authentic.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">All one has to do is use to google to discover it was a parody written by Keith Henson.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">NEW OT VI: SOLO NOTS</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">No checksheet exist. most of the Solo NOTS only materials are missing. For a full rundown on what the full Solo NOTs materials consist of, please read my essay on the Synopsis of Solo NOTs<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">ORIGINAL OT VIII</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The lone HCOB in that section is authentic. It is the only HCOB ever issued that has OT VIII in either the title or the distribution.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Paradoxically that HCOB has never been part of OT VIII as delivered on the Freewinds or by the Church.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">NEW OT VIII</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">This is one of the three versions of OT VIII released by the Church. It was released after the fiasco of the first version of OT VIII on the Maiden Voyage. Out of 300 people who did that version of OT VIII, more than 40 had dropped dead within 3 months. This was a tightly kept secret. Since i was working in the OT VIII Eligibility HGC at the time, I became privy to all sort of information on the matter.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In late 1988, the following Tech terminals were secretly RPFed:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Ray Mithoff</i></b>, actual author of the Freewinds OT VIII with some assistance from LRH handwritten notes. As is the case with all Scientology compilations since 1985, David Miscavige had absolute veto power over it and approved its release.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The entire Freewind (FSSO) OT VIII delivery team except for one course Supervisor, the OT VIII review Auditor and the Tech page. It specifically included <b><i>Margaret Supak </i></b>(Senior C/S FSSO) and the late <b><i>Laura Wolfe </i></b>(OT VIII C/S)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">At the FSO the following two C/Ses were RPFed for having an unusually high proportion of the dead among people they had C/sed:<b><i> Ruthe Humprey </i></b>and<b><i> Dan McNicholl</i></b>.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A number of year ago, Ariane Jackson, a former friend and pc of mine became livid when she discovered how abused and ripped off her ex-husband had been by the Church and had literally died of a broken Heart with Scientology. (His diary has been published on the Internet under the title: <b><i>Diary of a Dying Scientologist</i></b>).She decided to punish the Church by telling all she knew about OT VIII on the Internet.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I immediately emailed Ariane and we had a series of pleasant communications. The next day she wrote me, informing me that there were 8 lawyers representing the Church in her living room. Ariane was never heard of again. It requires no great ability to speculate what happened next: the two million dollars in loans arranged by the Church that her ex-husband had made to dead-beats, being reimbursed to her and their child, plus hush money and a gag order..<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">L10</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Grossly inaccurate and incomplete materials.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It includes the Class X course checksheet. For some reason all of the auditors who claim to deliver L-10 in the independent field make nothing of the fact that there are 24 theory bulletins on the Checksheet that are not available in any form nor even an abridged summary. Those bulletins explains the procedures, the auditing style and general prerequisites and core theory of the rundown.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Most of the process sheets in that section are as Warren McShane had testified in court "unartful and severely incomplete reconstructions".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I have repeatedly stated that one of the missing bulletins states that you can seriously deteriorate a case or even kill him by misrunning L-10. This has been always glossed over by those who have a financial interest in delivering rundowns they are not qualified for, since most of these pseudo-auditors instantly wash their hands of any overt product they make, much like a cheap mechanic who refuse to honor any warranty on his repairs as long as the car has been driven out of his lot.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">L11</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">This pathetic reconstruction fails to explain the theory behind the rundown nor how it is achieved. Some of the steps are even given in the wrong sequence.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">L12</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Very poor reconstruction with none of the theory behind L12 explained in any way. Several of the techniques used on L-12 are only described in an LRH briefing. Neither the tape, nor a transcript, or even notes or summary of it are known to exist outside of the Church</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Anyone who delivers that rundown under those conditions is deeply out-ethics and can have only financial motives for delivering a rundown that can easily deteriorate a case (and in some celebrated cases in the Independent field) make them act like ranting lunatics.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">NEW VITALITY RUNDOWN</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Quickiest of the quickies is the only way to describe this laughable write-up by Russ Meadows who was declared Suppressive in 1976 under orders by LRH. The 1976 HCOB "Auditing reports, Falsifying of" summarize Russ's career. His write up omits almost everything of importance, starting with the fact that the New Vitality Rundown is a Dianetics Rundown. This has led a Squirrel in the US Midwest to market that "LRH Rundown" while he delivers processes of his own manufacture instead. Having failed to produce the expected result of a Valence shift, the pseudo-auditor then runs NOTs commands and procedures on lower level pcs. When I privately chastised the auditor for both Fraud (selling an out-tech Rundown of his own manufacture while claiming it is LRH) and squirreling (auditing NOTs procedures on lower level cases), his reaction was extremely violent. He wrote a Suppressive Person Declare on me and distributed it to his "Friends". He then added the heinous fabrication that I wished his wife dead. I did not even know he was married and to this day I do not even know the name of that woman nor anything about her. I never wish people dead. It is against my basic philosophy. I want criminals to stop being out-ethics and I wish liars to stop lying because according to my fundamental belief, anyone can redeem himself. Only someone cruel wish to see people dead.<b></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">These bulletins are authentic. They were released in 1978 but soon after were withdrawn stating that their use was restricted to SuperPower only.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SUPERPOWER</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The version of SuperPower is a pure work of fantasy from the Freezone.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The correct SuperPower Rundown as originally conceived by LRH consist of the following 12 steps:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>C/S 53 </i></b>(as included in the Tech Volumes)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Ethics repair list </i></b>(the original list issued in 1978 is NOT the same as the one in Volume 14.The Ethics Repair List in Volume 14 was written by a person with a long history of out 2D and alcoholism)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Personal revival rundown </i></b>(not released /known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Consequences rundown</i></b> (not released/known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Bright think rundown </i></b>(as described above)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Study green form </i></b>(in the New Tech Volumes)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>False data rundown parts I and II </i></b>(not released/known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Cause rundown </i></b>(not released nor known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Power of choice rundown</i></b> (not released nor known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"> <b><i>Perception rundown </i></b> (not released nor known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"> <b><i>Learning drills</i></b> (not released nor known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Physical universe drills</i></b> (not released nor known in the Independent field)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The original purpose of SuperPower was to resolve all the ills that make staff members poor workers or ineffective.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">ANALYSIS OF THE BOGUS SUPERPOWER STEPS</span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- A ludicrous statement is made about there being a "condition of No Condition" Obviously the one who designed that step failed to word Clear the word Condition, which means state of being. One cannot avoid being in some form of state of being, even postulating oneself in the lowest possible levels of unconsciousness or non-existence causes someone to still be in some type of state of being or condition. It is followed by the command to "Find a Viewpoint". If the author of that process had understood the axioms well, he would have written "Assume a Viewpoint" instead.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- The next step directs the person to violate all known references on exterior and ending sessions, plus those on persistent F/N. It then introduces the false datum that one can audit over a big win and over a persistent F/N. The author appears to never have read the definition of a persistent F/N: it persists, therefore by definition you could no longer get reads without having killed it first, yet the authors insinuate that only a Floating TA cause an F/N to be truly persistent.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3-This is followed by a Creative Processing Process. Owing to their having been abandoned by LRH long ago, it is proof by itself that the process cannot be genuine.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">4- A seriously altered version of the Ethics Repair list with a number of important questions omitted.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">5- The next step is another Creative Processing Action</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">6- The last set of process shows its author confusion on flows, some of the commands have Flow one reversed with Flow 2 or have flow 3 omitted.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The last Creative Processes in this rundown are a form of Validation Processing. Long experience with that kind of process has shown that they have built in instability within them and that the key-outs created by that type of process not only do not last long, but frequently result in an eventual very strong key-in days or months later. At least one case in the Independent field that had been doing well before the rundown was started committed suicide shortly after completing it.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Therefore consider as out-ethics any auditor still running this rundown once they have been appraised of the data above.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Obviously those whose overts are restimulated by my analysis above will probably attack me.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It is my hope that others, which form the majority, will benefit greatly from my statements and be able to make better and effective progress toward improvement and a better state of well-being.</p><br/><em>Pierre Ethier</em>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-62835156248195849392013-02-25T19:07:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:33:32.414-07:00SYNOPSIS OF THE SOLO NOTs RUNDOWN, BULLETINS AND PROCEDURES<p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre-ethier-class-xii-fso.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2903" alt="Pierre-Ethier-Class-XII-FSO" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/pierre-ethier-class-xii-fso.jpg" width="593" height="576" /></a></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SYNOPSIS OF THE SOLO NOTs RUNDOWN, BULLETINS AND PROCEDURES </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><i>(This write-up contains no “OT only data” and may be read by anyone)</i></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><i> </i></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">What follows are verifiable facts written by someone who in addition to having fully studied and trained on the all of the original NOTs and SOLO NOTs materials, has audited many thousands of hours on nearly 1000 different Solo NOTS pre-OTs, including over 400 Solo NOTs EP checks.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It is meant to supersede numerous speculations and fantasies that can be found on the Internet that were uniformly composed by people who for one reason never had access to first hand information.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">HISTORY </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The release of Solo NOTs was announced on October 1981 by Snr C/S Int, David Mayo to a full auditorium at the Flag Land Base in Clearwater. I was there, as a NOTs Review auditor at the time.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A full copy of the Briefing is available the Source Magazine (Flag Service Organization semi-monthly Magazine) that was published subsequently.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Being a NOTs auditor at the time, I was privileged to attend additional NOTS Personnel ONLY Briefings (for NOTs auditors, Case Supervisors and Directors of Processing only).</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Solo NOTs was created and designed by LRH, as it was discovered that all NOTs case completions were unstable. Barely months or even weeks after attesting, they were found to still be loaded with NOTs type phenomenon and charge. LRH was the first person to pilot the level and it was found to be a very long level. LRH himself had just completed it successfully.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">CONFIDENTIAL SOLO NOTs ONLY BULLETINS </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Three CONFIDENTIAL SOLO NOTS ONLY HCO BULLETINS were released and available to SOLO NOTS Review Auditors and C/Ses ONLY.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The first bulletin was not truly confidential and included mainly the details on the administration of the level, in particular details about the additional administrative steps required because people would be auditing it mainly at home. People were required to audit daily and send a weekly report before Thursday (Florida time) at 2PM. Worksheets were to mailed in every other week in AIRMAIL First Class envelopes without any confidential markings.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Second Bulletin dealt with procedures and actions specific to SOLO NOTs only: essentially minor changes and refinements over the routine NOTS procedures found in the regular audited NOTS Bulletins.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The third Bulletin was for C/Ses ONLY and explained what the true END PHENOMENA of SOLO NOTS was expected to be and delineated the steps to follow to verify and validate that END Phenomenon if and when it should occur. It was normally never shown to NOTS auditors, even those doing SOLO NOTS reviews. The bulletin gave details from LRH Solo auditing including how many hours LRH had actually audited to completion on that level.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A fourth Bulletin came less than two years later called ADVANCED PROCEDURE and gave a new technique designed to find and run out charge faster and more effectively. I would subsequently compare moving from the Routine to the Advanced Procedure to trading a hunting rifle for a high Speed machine gun. The Advanced procedure has been fully tested and has been found to run well on advanced cases (cases that have spent at least one month worth of Auditing Solo NOTs and were properly prepared by a full run of the audited NOTs program). Not everyone runs well on it.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The fifth Bulletin describes a startling new approach to addressing the charge found on Solo NOTs.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">When applied correctly and CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD, it is extremely powerful and directly deals with some of the most fundamental philosophical questions such as: "Who am I?", "What is the meaning of life?", "Why am I here?" "Why do I behave the way I do?"</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SOLO NOTs EP CHECK </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In early 1985, in order to properly authenticate and validate SOLO NOTS completions, a HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOLO NOTs EP check (in three parts) was handed out to ONLY 6 people at the Flag Land Base: only those selected few directly involved with verifying the EP of SOLO NOTs were allowed to read it: the Snr C/S Flag, the Deputy Snr C/S for NOTs and SOLO NOTs, all three Solo NOTS C/Ses, the SOLO NOTS EP check Auditor and the Chief Cramming Officer. Everyone else was strictly forbidden access to those. After repeated failures by the Solo NOTs EP Check Auditor (Rick Sheehy), I was ordered by the Deputy Snr C/S to replace him. Two Class XIIs were also shown the SOLO NOTS EP check, for public requiring a German speaking auditor (a language I know the rudiments of and have audited in, but lacked the expertise for a fully fluent check) The Solo NOTs EP check contains the CONFIDENTIAL EP of SOLO NOTS. That EP is written in no other bulletin and so far, I have seen plenty of evidence that those who routinely assert making Solo NOTs completions in the FREEZONE, DO NOT KNOW IT and per their own statements simply do not achieve that EP. Worse, the C/Ses (in the cases that use one) omit numerous vital steps in the programming of such cases. As a result most FREEZONE Solo NOTS completions (and most of those currently being done in the Church) are being robbed of a significant part of the wins, abilities and attributes they would have had a right to expect from completing Solo NOTs. This is the Sixth and final SOLO NOTs ONLY set of issues. When I left Flag in 1991, only 11 people at Flag, including myself, had read those highly confidential issues.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">EARLY SOLO NOTs COMPLETIONS </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Each of the first 100 people the FLAG SOLO NOTs C/Ses (as approved by the Flag Service Organization Snr C/S) had to be approved by RTC before they had the permission to attest. The first 20 proposals were all denied and came back with extensive Cramming Orders. Eventually in early 1985 Betty Filisky was allowed to attest as the First Solo NOTS completion. From Solo NOTs completion Number 300 (1986) to 900 (1990) I did approximately two third of the Solo NOTs EP checks: approximately half of them on Wednesday Nights and Thursday Mornings.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">None of the six set of issues above were revised in any way or form from its moment of issuance until sometime after the advent of the "Golden Age of Tech" (1996).</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Over the past few years, I have been shown copies the Solo NOTs bulletins that were revised under the guidance of David Miscavige and RTC. Each one of those "revised" bulletins contains serious out-tech such as the introduction of arbitraries, the violation of fundamental rules on recognizing the END PHENOMENON of a procedure or process, or seeking to restimulate new charge before the one at hand is fully addressed.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SHARING THE DATA </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Paradoxically, a number of the current opinion leaders of the FREEZONE who are always hungry for "NEW TECH" before they have even mastered how to apply properly what they already have, apply without qualms those altered and out-tech issues because it is the ONLY THING THEY HAVE. Their motto, as professed by the self-appointed Freezone PR (and their professed friends) is that ANY TECH is better than no Tech (something L. Ron Hubbard has vigorously rebutted in dozen of Saint Hill Briefing Course Lectures made since the original statement made in the 1950s and states clearly that such a rule only applies to introductory auditing: IT IS SPECIFICALLY DENIED IN UPPER LEVEL PROCEDURES AND OT LEVELS).</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In my conversations with him, the aberrant ideals promoted by that Flim-Flam artist that calls himself the FREEZONE PR is that "SQUIRELLING is better than NO AUDITING" and that as far as tech is concerned 1- If you don’t have it, but must either properly train or pay for it: Try to steal it. 2-If you can't steal it: deny it even exist, and accuse those who do have it of being con-men by widely repeating the Church Enemy lines about those individuals. 3- If it is proven it does exist, incite poorly trained auditors to fill any gaps with processes of their own manufacture while pretending it is "PURE LRH". Too many, otherwise well meaning FREEZONE practitioners have fallen prey to that false propaganda that appears to be designed to serve the interests of the Church and discourage anything but unprofessional and unethical standards for the Freezone.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">REFUSAL TO PROVIDE POTENTIALLY HARMFUL DATA TO THE RECKLESS </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">One may ask why don't you give Advanced Tech (Solo NOTs or otherwise) it to them?</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The answer is very simple: it can be said about each and every one of the individuals that complains that I did not give Advance tech to them:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- Except for three persons, they have never even asked me, deciding to malign me first as soon as they perceived that I knew something they did not, or could possibly become more popular than they were, as a threat to their income.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- They have repeatedly openly defamed me, and sometimes even used their own public to spread the Church Enemy lines about me and secretly preyed on my clients with false promises. All but one of those individuals who bitterly complains, directly tried to extort materials or money from me, using the threat that they would be "running a Black PR" campaign directed me until (they vainly hope) they created my professional decease and in their very own words "get me run off the Freezone". One of them even incited his pc to noisily threaten me and my family with an entirely vexatious Lawsuit (complete with Lawyer letters and threats), while gleefully broadcasting that they wished through the proceeds of their "lawsuit" to see me, my wife and autistic child penniless on the street, while that FREEZONE auditor, his pc and his support group shared among themselves the spoils of my postulated demise, which represent everything I have ever worked for and earned honestly.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In all cases, because of their own poor products and their obvious lies, the black PR campaign only managed to seduce the gullible or those already prejudiced. It gave me a lot of Free Publicity and increased the number of friendly inquiries always to a new plateau after each of those "OSA style" PR campaign apparently instigated by individuals in the FREEZONE. (It is my opinion that the Freezone individuals promoting the Church Enemy lines or engaging in those failed Black PR campaigns are wittingly or not acting as stooges or agents of the Church and OSA)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- Perhaps most importantly of all, Experience from hundreds of practitioners with thousands of individuals, as testified at nauseam in Discussion groups all over the Internet has conclusively shown that Incompetent or reckless auditing or delivery of OT Levels and procedures can create insanity, Mental Insatiability, Introversion or even Suicide.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Contrarily to the Freezone and the Church of Scientology, I refuse to brush these off as trivial.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SIMPLE REQUIREMENTS </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">As stated above, the Advanced Procedures and OT Levels of Scientology are like a bottle of Nitro-glycerine: the inexpert handler can seemingly get away with it often enough to eventually become utterly reckless and bring about an unavoidable disaster for all those unlucky enough to be close by.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Therefore as a matter of Integrity and Ethical standard, I feel obligated to demand that:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- The practitioner applying to apply those materials must demonstrate that he has the minimum amount of skills and competence to deliver those actions correctly. In the case of demonstration of competence, I use the rule of common sense where examination is required rather than accepting silver-tongue PR. (Following similar ideas to those in Hubbard's Policies on "LOOK, DON'T LISTEN"). Also when an incompetent individual produces a bad result from his own recklessness or mistakes, he/she tend to blame those who tried to help. In other words, the handful of complainers that I did not give them the Tech they wanted, solely view me as a Cash Cow to be sacrificed or butchered the instant I fail to raise their private Income.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- The second one is that I receive proper and just compensation for my time and effort in teaching. Based on results, End Phenomena and the amount of work actually performed, I actually charge less than over 50% of the Freezone auditors who criticize me.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Apparently it is OK for them to charge their High prices for delivering or teaching in turn anything I would have taught them , yet feel that I am morally obligated to service them FOR FREE (or better yet, at my own expense) , like if I somehow were their personal servant or slave.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- That they do not try to entrap me by trying to seducing me into forwarding (they hope) is copyrighted materials. (I do not provide materials that copyrighted to anyone except those On which I own the copyright. I provide guidance and correction to those seeking them. In several instances individuals working for a Freezone practitioner have tried to ensnare their enemies by soliciting Copyrighted materials and quietly reporting the matter to OSA, while all along advertising itself as an Ethical Freezone or Independent auditor.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">LRH FREQUENTLY MISQUOTED </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I am still at a loss to comprehend that type of logic, except that it might be the result of mis-duplicating L. Ron Hubbard most misquoted statement:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>"The work was free.</i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;"><b><i>Keep it so. " </i></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">That quote from the original Clear procedure Booklet refers to the Tech being "FREE FROM BEING CONTROLLED BY MONOPOLIES OR SELF INTEREST GROUPS" Too many believe it means that the Tech is GRATIS for all. Note that grammatically, the expression "THE WORK WAS FOR FREE" should have been the more proper way to say it for someone with the writing skills of L. Ron Hubbard. It is also well documented that Hubbard himself charged got paid handsomely paid for every bulletin, piece of writing or rundown he released.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">HOW TO COMPLETE SOLO NOTS </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The following rules are primarily based on common sense and professional standards.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Those who disagree tend to do it because they see producing Quickie products as financially beneficial to their practice</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A- Individuals seeking to do Solo NOTs should do it under the guidance of a competent individual only</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The competent individual applies the following rules:</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">1- <span style="text-decoration:underline;">GET PROPERLY TRAINED</span>: Getting trained is far more than reading a few bulletins on a computer screen. At least one of the practitioners in the Freezone movement openly admits studying the NOTs pack while consuming beer and smoking cigarettes. A number of others skip any form of Solo course and instruct the student verbally (often through skype) on how to do Solo NOTs. Besides reading the materials, it is simple question of Integrity to ensure one has been checked by a PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR on the numerous procedures to be certain one does it right.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">2- <span style="text-decoration:underline;">GET PROPERLY APPRENTICED</span>: Apprenticeships or Internships are vital for the professional auditor:. Advanced Levels were never conceived for delivery by the lone Field auditor, as they are vastly more complex to supervise properly and require a high enough level of expertise to deliver them properly. Without guidance, the field auditor auditing a complex rundown is certain to develop bad habits, to quickie various steps and to mishandle (or ignore) a number of bad indicators whenever they occur. The typical answer to problems by an auditor operating without a C/S or a C/S operating without a Snr C/S is resorting to unusual solutions.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">3- <span style="text-decoration:underline;">DO NOT AGGRANDIZE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR SKILLS</span>: It is a great temptation for the poorly trained auditor facing financial hardship to exaggerate his credentials. The Freezone has a plethora of poorly trained Class IVs that never interned, or even if they did, have self-awarded themselves Class VI, VIII and in some cases XII. Some auditors go as far as inventing the steps of Rundowns created by L. Ron Hubbard on which they do not have documentation, (such as New Vitality Rundown or the Ls) falsely professing they have the "PURE LRH ORIGINAL, when they have boot-leg grossly altered versions. In at least one case a Freezone practitioner that has publicly advertised having Evil Intentions toward me and sold for a profit Upper Level issues that are forgeries and has apposed by name on them. A Freezone Entrepreneur proceeded to train for his own financial gain "Ron's Org staff using those same forgeries, mixed with other forgeries and boot-leg bulletins.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The end product of auditors who pretend training not attained is quickie products and impaired thinking for a greater or smaller number of their clients. It is dishonest. They eventually, follow suit themselves in that dwindling spiral by eventually becoming thoroughly messed up and delusional cases themselves.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">4- <span style="text-decoration:underline;">ASK ASSISTANCE FROM SOMEONE WHO TRULY KNOWS AND IS TRULY TRAINED</span> (as opposed as from a Flim-Flam Artist): Too often auditors or C/Ses will accept the verbal and false incompetent advice by those who pose as Authorities. Someone accepting such advice is a fool, just like someone with alarming symptoms seeking advice on the Internet from non-doctors and self medicating instead of seeking the help of a true Physician.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">5- <span style="text-decoration:underline;">ENSURE THE PERSON DOING A MAJOR OT GRADE OR LEVEL IS PROPERLY SETUP PER EXISTING CHECKLISTS, C/S SERIES AND MATERIALS</span>. Often violated for convenience or because the auditor or C/S could not face the task of writing a proper program, this is the reason for delusional people after the Upper Grades or their dramatizing Evil Intents and being plain "Crazy".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A- Successful completion of Solo NOTs is largely dependent upon being properly set-up for it (and therefore having reach the proper reality for it)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">B- The person auditing SOLO NOTs must audit regularly, (daily is preferable), must refer to the materials and have an open communication line with someone competent to supervise his case.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">C- The criteria to establish overall progress on the Level is not the number of month or years spent on the level, but the cumulative number of hours audited on it. An individual doing less than two hours a week will only audit 100 hours a year. In 5 years, he will have audited barely 500 hours. But, another one doing 12 hours a week, will have audited 600 hours in the first year and will be therefore more advanced than the one who has been doing his 2 hours a week for 5 years.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">D<b>- DOING ALL THE STEPS OF AUDITED NOTS CORRECTLY IS CRUCIAL TO THE ATTAINMENT OF THE FULL EP OF SOLO NOTS</b>. Many of the steps of audited NOTs are not designed to be done Solo. It is a violation of both the Solo C/S Series and HCOB 11 September 1970 to audit Solo (or skip) the early step of the NOTs program. LRH himself calls such an action, one for the “dickey birds”</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Someone cannot honestly claim to have achieved or having made another achieve the full EP of Solo NOTs if some of the steps of audited NOTs have been either quickied or omitted without at the very least making an honest effort to ensure the person gets run on them.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A few know-best individuals, whose common denominators are never having trained under anyone on NOTs routinely tell people that audited NOTs is "unnecessary" or that "from OT III onward, the entire Bridge is Solo" These false data explicitly conflict not only with LRH data above but with common sense as well.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">E- Once a person has done all the actions on Solo NOTS and feels done, a FULL Folder Error Summary must be done. It should have been done of previous available folders before someone starts or continues Solo NOTs. The Solo Folders should be FESed. I know of no one, except for me who has even done that outside of the Church.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">F- Since SOLO NOTS is "SOLO NEW ERA DIANETICS FOR OTs", it would seem obvious to someone trained as a Senior C/S that the SOLO NOTS completion, in additional to those specifically related to the Solo NOTs procedure or technology, should have those expected of a DIANETIC PC. The Health Form (renamed Original Assessment for NED) has many of questions the C/S should ask himself about the case before he proceeds further at this point. Attesting blindly someone who glibly asserts they are done, when they still have compulsions, fears, somatics, aberrations or some form of out-ethics is not merely foolish, it is suppressive. It not only falsely validate the individual, it will make him harder to handle for the auditor and the C/S that will try to do his next step. The person will be a bad example and damage the repute of the Freezone and the credibility of Scientology as a subject. By actual statistics, within 5 years at least 50% of those quickie products will abandon the belief that Scientology has any workability at all. A further 20% will engage in all forms of squirreling, still desperately trying to handle their ruins that the prior auditors and Case Supervisors found convenient to ignore.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">One could ask the question to the PR artists that promote that kind of product by fanatically validating those who produce them, what is their true intent. It cannot be to help individuals achieve personal freedom or enlightenment. It can only have to with immediate self-gratification, either based on financial gain or Power or worse the seeking of the same False High as the one achieved from Drugs or an adrenalin rush.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">G- There is a significant of technology that has been either partially developed or released concerning NOTs. NOTs, by its very nature allows a quasi-infinity of commands to address any condition or case aspect the person receiving may need to handle. Under the most competent of Case Supervisors Tailored questions were formulated to address any and all conditions. The two most common conditions found in people are PTSness (being the adverse effect of someone dramatizing Evil Purposes) or having Evil Purposes, and Negative or Succumb postulates on one or more dynamics.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Additional steps exist to address any form of earlier practices, recurring case conditions and hidden standards. There are also catch all actions, somewhat like the prepared assessment rundown, identity and disability rundowns found on NED, but tailored to NOTs that can be added to ensure completed cases stand out like a shining jewel in all of its glory.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE NOTS STABILITY RUNDOWN </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">H- Originally issued with a lone question and a single command procedure, the original NOTs PTS step issued in 1978 was a very rudimentary and simplistic approach to addressing NOTs at the case level. It could miss on individuals who have a significant amount of charge or aberration connected with the subject.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In 1991, the LRH compilation unit formulated a precise and thorough procedure for addressing PTSness at the NOTs case level. The procedure was based on LRH research, primary the one done during the Special Rundown in November 1975, where the theory and key concepts of the procedure are outlined. The lone question was complemented by a total of 83 questions in order to cover all facets of PTSness. My own research and search within the totality of LRH writings and conferences for every single characteristic, symptom and attributes connected with PTSness led me to expand the list of 83 question to a possible 169 questions, plus many additional questions for running out over 100 attitudes, emotions and symptoms typically associated with PTSness. While not all may be required for all cases, some may require them all.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In 1991 to incite people to come to Flag for more auditing, the newly developed steps were broadly promoted as the<b><i> STABILITY RUNDOWN </i></b>(PTSness step as described above) and <b><i>HELD DOWN SEVEN RUNDOWN </i></b>(based on the Evil Purpose step below). The <b><i>FIXATED PERSON RUNDOWN</i></b> was added some time later.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">FULL NOTS FIXATED PERSON RUNDOWN </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Fixated attention on one or more individuals is a symptom frequently found in PTS individuals.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A full and stable handling of the condition requires many more questions that the two or so questions already published on the subject. Over two dozen questions, each with its own subset of questions completes that Rundown.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE HELD DOWN SEVEN RUNDOWN </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I- A Flag C/S coined the expression "Held down Seven Rundown". When told to attest someone to the "New Rundown", the examiner queried the C/S for a proper non-ambiguous name, Using the simple logic that a Rock Slam (Evil Purpose) is based on a fixated aberration and that a held down Seven is such a computation, the name Held Down Seven Rundown was born. The approach to handle Evil Purposes and Rock Slams as presented in the new 1991 is simply taken verbatim from a set of handwritten LRH L-10 instructions written back in 1971. Since I have read and studied those handwritten instructions during my Class X course, I hope to put to rest those Nay Sayers who dramatize their own Held down Seven by falsely claiming that NOTs was not designed by L. Ron Hubbard. In 1984 David Mayo in his Advanced Ability Center issues written in Santa Barbara wrote the procedure and commands of that step in full details. Since it has been proven that David Mayo had no access to the NOTs materials after he left the Church in 1981 and he took no NOTs materials with him, the only plausible conclusion is that in 1991 the Church while it broadly promoted that the "1991 NOTS COURSE PACKS" had removed the last remnants associated with David Mayo, actually plagiarized him.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">J- Once the person has gone through all steps above and the properly trained C/S and Snr C/S agree that there is no more to handle. The person is returned to SOLO, as entire areas of case may have now opened up that were simply not available or confront able. Either of two phenomena will occur: the person will find a significant amount of case and therefore will be returned on SOLO NOTs as before OR the person finds or nothing and still has the metered manifestation of the End Phenomenon. At this point, the person is sent to do the SOLO NOTS EP check.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SOLO NOTS EP CHECK </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">K- The Solo NOTS EP check that I did on many hundreds of different people (including such celebrities as Karen Black, Amanda Ambrose, Mimi Rogers, Priscilla Presley. Bobby Lyons, Susana Gonzales,...) consisted of three steps and was very simple. The first two steps are done by the auditor in session in two separate sessions. The third step is done at the examiner. The first step consist of a set of questions to ensure the person is clean case wise and ethically. The second step is a unique form of rehab specific to that level. The entire action would rarely take more than 45 minutes. SIMPLICITY was the key word. But as with everything RTC touches, things become complicated.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In the Church, the Solo NOTS EP check has grown to a monstrosity lasting several intensives. The original 12 or so questions of the first step have grown to nearly 100.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">A Freezone auditor who per his statement to me, did some of those aberrant "Solo NOTs EP Checks" in the early years of the 21st Century, spent several intensives on a single question. Each of the new questions has already been asked at nauseam on previous sec-checks and videoed. False reads were explored for hours until the auditor decided to accept what a good auditor should have seen as obvious within minutes. A Cheese Maker from a small Swiss town who could not speak a word of English and had never been to America except for SOLO NOTS at Flag was interrogated for nearly 10 hours about a "read" on having connections to the CIA before the question was finally dropped. Years later, when I ran out the session, it became evident; the person still did not even understand what the CIA was. yet the auditor who did such an atrocity is happily auditing away boasting having done a fantastic job on his Flag pcs and with the greatest of insouciance is reportedly auditing the same action on his current pcs without once considering he may have a need to face correction (or Ethics)</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE SHERMAN TANK SCENARIO FULFILLMENT SYNDROME </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The Scenario Fulfilment Syndrome refers to a scenario where people are indoctrinated so thoroughly to expect a hostile act from their enemies that they see it when it is not occurring. Such an event occurred in 1988 aboard the USS Vincennes where the crew mistook an Iranian Airbus airplane on a routine flight for a jet fighter on an attack dive. It cost the lives of nearly 300 innocent civilians.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In the Church people are indoctrinated to keep looking for the Sherman Tank: the Suppressive who solely derives pleasure from sabotaging “the most Ethical group in the Universe”. Therefore they will plough on and on until they find (or more correctly said: invent) an explanation to the "down statistics", low income, or other organisation ill.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">For each and every dirty needle caused through one of the numerous auditor code breaks that the new auditors in the Church are taught to commit, a fanatical and ruthless search is on looking for the HUGE HIDEN OVERTS committed by the person holding the cans. This is especially true at Flag where auditors are now being brainwashed into the belief that they are perfect simply because a failed auditor who never got products himself says that no auditor at Flag ever errs. (David Miscavige and his Golden Age of Tech)</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Obviously, those responsible for the application of the Tech at Flag do not believe that it works. How else can one explain why they expect tons of reads on sec checks that were already found clean by previous auditors that were deemed to be flub-less. They either do not believe Man is basically good, or they correctly view their brand of auditing as highly destructive because according to their actions, the more "Man" is audited the less trustworthy he becomes and the more he/she is prone to unethical behavior and contra-survival acts. This lead the casual observer convinced that the "technology" they are using is unworkable or false, just like a person using the same brand of detergent to wash things that left them dirty would very promptly switch brand, if he had any sense.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">THE INFAMOUS SIX MONTH CHECK </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In 1984, shortly after Robin Scott reached fame (or infamy depending on the viewpoint) by impersonating a Sea Org Missionaire and stolen a NOTs pack from Copenhagen Advanced organization, I was personally ordered by the Snr C/S FSO to do a very difficult sec-check. The woman whose identity I have chosen to keep private stood accused of having just robbed a SOLO NOTS course pack from the Solo NOTs that very day. Never in my career, have I seen someone holding the cans being so nervous and evasive. It is one of the very few times in nearly 40 years of counselling that I had to resort to METER INTERROGATION as described in the HCO Bulletin of the same name. The meter do the talking: "Did you take something from the course room?" LONG FALL. "Was it, somebody else belongings? (no read) A Book? (no read) A Solo NOTS course pack? LFBD... Complete certainly, control and excellent TRs are required for this procedure to be successful. The course pack was recovered that day from the woman's apartment. The Sea Org Executives at Flag were unwilling to wait for the session results and ordered someone to break into her apartment. The course pack was recovered and returned to the Class Room.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">This incident caused turmoil within the SOLO NOTS HGC and led the FSO Supervisors and Snr C/S Int Offices to completely revamp the Security standards used in Scientology. The standards used today on the Freewinds are largely based on that incident.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">As part of the Security improvements, the policies on OT Eligibility in the OEC volumes were scrutinized and a series of OT Eligibility sec-checks and "OT Eligibility Verification" were instituted. This included 6-month check to be done on all those doing Solo NOTs twice a year.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">The order to start performing the 6 month check came in long before any 6 month check or Eligibility confessional were ever prepared by RTC or for them (They were seemingly too busy suppressing Mission Holders and running a Terror Campaign to intimidate anyone who did not sheepishly submit to them).The Snr C/S FSO ordered the Lead SOLO NOTS C/S to write it up. A 40 question sec-check was this born, with the usual expected questions; "Since you were last here, any out ethics? out-2D? connection with Squirrels? etc.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I started doing those sec checks on SOLO NOTS pre-OTS as soon as the sec-check was unofficially issued. In the vast majority of cases, the sec check, including rudiments was done in less than an hour, especially for those that were doing well. Those who found it too difficult to come twice a year (Europeans and Australians for example) would normally petition successfully the SOLO NOTS Director of Processing for an extension or to only come once a year. Things were simple. Everyone was happy. Nobody complained. Another benefit of significance was to allow those returning for the 6 month check to refresh the materials for the benefit of their memory as people on Advanced Levels in the Church are strictly forbidden to have any handwritten notes. Nobody was charged an additional amount for the refresher in the Classroom or using Qual facilities</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">I have always viewed the policy forbidding people on SOLO NOTs to have access to a course pack or even handwritten notes to be impractical and unrealistic. A thorough count of every technique available to the Solo NOTS auditor show there are at least 79 different techniques, many with multiple commands (as many as 12 steps for the more complex ones). Expecting someone who has only been exposed to those only for a few days in a classroom and never had the opportunity to apply ore than a handful in his apprenticeship sessions at Flag is nothing short of absurd. I am even convinced that people from the Freezone or Independent field that read about the existence of those 79 techniques will be surprised to hear there are so many and even get into a KNOW-BEST type of denial, especially if they are involved in quickie completions. Yet there are, and I am far from being the only one who came up with that count. It is even written in the SOLONOTS Hating pack that is now given to people who enrol on Solo NOTS at Flag.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">As the years passed the 6 Month check evolved into a highly complex ritual. The average length of the check went from less than one hour and a single day to one intensive or more and a full week. It eventually grew to several intensives and multiple weeks and a complex off-line actions. Entire rundowns were introduced in the middle of the current program of Solo NOTs. To justify this obviously violation of the fundamentals of the C/S Series the Bulletin "The Non interference zone" also known as C/S series 73 was revised in 1983, then in 1985 and finally in 1990. Each revision grossly contradicting the previous one and each one entirely attributed to LRH as its one and only source. Seemingly, it has yet again revised in the XXIst Century, I am told. Yet the Bulletins were each time signed "L. Ron Hubbard" without the signatory mentioning any assistants, helpers or compilers. Since both the style and the application greatly vary from one issue to another, the only logical conclusion is that each of those bulletins was written by different individuals. The Church insisting that the same writer authored is willy-nilly insinuating that the purported writer suffered from Multiple Personality disorder.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SUMMARY </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">When I announced the first SOLO NOTs entirely made in the Independent field (from beginning to end), his success story was instantly denigrated and I was viciously attacked by the same" FREEZONE practitioners" who take umbrage to any insinuation they are not the best and the most perfect of all auditors, One of them keep repeating the same lie that he fabricated accusing me of having been trained exclusively in the Golden Age of tech and being a purveyor of false tech. My repeated replies that the Golden Age of tech was created in 1996,a full 4 years after I left the Church, were always answered by the same lie and slogan. He finally had to drop the earlier slogan he had created in order to protect his financial interests accusing me of being "solely RTC trained”. When I proved that the day RTC was incorporated in 1982, I was already far more trained and had done more internships than he had in present time, nearly three decades later, he simply went quiet.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">In a way, it saddens me to see that a group of Freezone practitioners routinely "attest" their public on Solo NOTS with less than 50 hours of Solo NOTs auditing, often when the entirety of the audited program has been omitted (such as people going directly on Solo NOTS auditing and never receiving, the entirety of the steps involving PTSness and Evil Purposes having been skipped/ Worse some of their completions have rampant out-ethics such as being a Dead Beat parent reneging on Child support, embezzling or stealing money from their partners, secretly cheating on the sexual partners, or having stolen funds from their previous auditor. What else can be expected from people who are too lazy to train and never did a NOTs course, and are adamant at never allowing someone more trained read their session reports? What else can be expected from people who make false claims about their training and routinely lie to their public by delivering processes and rundowns they created or know were created within the Freezone by the Freezone,yet look their pc straight in the eye tell him it is the "genuine LRH article".</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">LRH kept saying that auditors and Organizations should be in the Leica or Rolls Royce Business. Yet those auditors are producing YUGOs (the worst car ever made) insisting they are as good as Rolls Royces.</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;">EPILOGUE </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;" align="center"><b><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></b></p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It takes a lot of work to produce a shiny product such as an authentic Solo NOTs completion. It requires a lot of expertise and experience. Producing authentic full products, conflicts with ideas of Auditing in Mass-Production mode and auditing for maximum profit.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Getting a Full Product on a complex rundown, like Solo NOTs is not a job for the lazy individual, the one who finds “no time to train”, nor for the one primarily interested in financial gain.</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">It requires an extraordinary amount of care. So much that few people are willing to go through the effort, since there are no true financial rewards for it, only the knowledge that it was the right thing to do and the knowledge that the receiving individual has truly moved that much closer to authentic Spiritual Freedom and Enlightenment</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Pierre Ethier</p><br/><p style="text-align:justify;">Class XII</p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-61570038240854509832013-02-25T17:27:00.000-08:002013-03-21T10:02:14.055-07:00The Little Prince by Exupery<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2900" height="476" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier.jpg" width="519" /></a></div>
<br />
Source: <a href="http://cs.swan.ac.uk/~cswill/The_little_prince.pdf" target="_blank">link</a><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
.......Indeed, as I learned, there were on the planet where the little prince lived– as on all planets– good plants and bad plants. In consequence, there were good seeds from good plants, and bad seeds from bad plants. But seeds are invisible. They sleep deep in the heart of the earth’s darkness, until some one among them is seized with the desire to awaken. Then this little seed will stretch itself and begin– timidly at first– to push a charming little sprig inoffensively upward toward the sun. If it is only a sprout of radish or the sprig of a rose-bush, one would let it grow wherever it might wish. But when it is a bad plant, one must destroy it as soon as possible, the very first instant that one recognizes it.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Now there were some terrible seeds on the planet that was the home of the little prince; and these were the seeds of the baobab. The soil of that planet was infested with them. A baobab is something you will never, never be able to get rid of if you attend to it too late. It spreads over the entire planet. It bores clear through it with its roots. And if the planet is too small, and the baobabs are too many, they split it in pieces. . .</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“It is a question of discipline,” the little prince said to me later on. “When you’ve finished your own toilet in the morning, then it is time to attend to the toilet of your planet, just so, with the greatest care. You must see to it that you pull up regularly all the baobabs, at the very first moment when they can be distinguished from the rosebushes which they resemble so closely in their earliest youth. It is very tedious work,” the little prince added, “but very easy.”</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And one day he said to me: “You ought to make a beautiful drawing, so that the children where you live can see exactly how all this is. That would be very useful to them if they were to travel some day. Sometimes,” he added, “there is no harm in putting off a piece of work until another day. But when it is a matter of baobabs, that always means a catastrophe. I knew a planet that was inhabited by a lazy man. He neglected three little bushes. . . ”</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://gravitando.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/p2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" class="aligncenter" height="356" src="http://gravitando.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/p2.jpg" width="434" /></a>So, as the little prince described it to me, I have made a drawing of that planet. I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. “Children,” I say plainly, “watch out for the baobabs!” My friends, like myself, have been skirting this danger for a long time, without ever knowing it; and so it is for them that I have worked so hard over this drawing. The lesson which I pass on by this means is worth all the trouble it has cost me.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Perhaps you will ask me, “Why is there no other drawing in this book as magnificent and impressive as this drawing of the baobabs?”</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The reply is simple. I have tried. But with the others I have not been successful. When I made the drawing of the baobabs I was carried beyond myself by the inspiring force of urgent necessity.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Related links:<br />
<a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-baobabs-of-tomorrow/" target="_blank">http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-baobabs-of-tomorrow/</a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img alt="" class="aligncenter" height="553" src="http://www.bibaloo.com/images/products/zoom/1287492159TheLittlePrince3..gif" width="440" /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-32557007785375627802013-02-23T15:41:00.000-08:002013-03-21T09:33:32.402-07:00Black Propaganda<h2><span style="color:#ff0000;">“Anyone engaging in black propaganda is either using a wrong way to right a wrong or confessing he can't make it in open competition”</span></h2><br/><p style="text-align:right;"><em>Hubbard, L. Ron, Hubbard Communication Office Policy Letter 11 May 1971 "Black PR</em>"</p><br/><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://sahajapower.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/albert-einstein.jpg" width="464" height="597" /></p>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4661337561492693005.post-17322077074220363672013-02-22T16:38:00.000-08:002013-03-21T11:35:54.826-07:00The Baobabs of TomorrowComing soon<br />
<br />
A <a href="http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/%d0%b2%d0%bb%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%80-%d0%b2%d1%8b%d1%81%d0%be%d1%86%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%b9-%d0%bf%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d0%be-%d0%bf%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b8/" target="_blank">Russian song</a> about the reincarnation describes those poor souls that have not behaved themselves honorably this lifetime and will be reborn as baobabs to spend next lifetime of 1000 years as a pitiful tree. Your deeds today shape your tomorrow.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/baobab.jpg"><img alt="baobab" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2880" height="395" src="http://pierreethier.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/baobab.jpg" width="593" /></a></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11504719308563559083noreply@blogger.com